실재한 사건, 다른 기록 - 『태평한화골계전』을 중심으로 -

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to take a look at the background of appearing on the end of Goryeo and early Joseon when the spirit of civilization transition was high along with the change of writing and implication of the changed writing as appeared in the process. For resolving the issue, <Taepeonghanwhagolgejeon> is selected as the main text. The intellectuals in initial time of Joseon had Lee Je-hyun’s <Yeokong Paeseol> as the model of Japrok. <Yeokong Paeseol> was set out for killing time, but it strives for historic value on its inner side. This is the tradition of the East Asian Study on lyrics that was not classified by literary men and historians. This is why Seo Geo-jeong quoted this book. In fact, <Taepeonghanwhagolgejeon> did not have significant gap between the historic writing and literary writing. The sense of responsibility of the author to supplement the history through <Taepeonghanwhagolgejeon> was great. However, <Taepeonghanwhagolgejeon> should be approached as the issue of ‘legitimacy versus non-legitimacy’ and it is wrong to consider as a fiction. The story quoted on <Tae> is overlapped in other Japroks. However, the matters actually occurred were recorded in different routes that each author renders different assessment. This also has to be considered as reflecting the position of historians that interpreted the history. At the end of Goryeo and early Joseon, namely, the era of civilization transition, the reasons to write this Japrok is largely outlined in two ways. One is the interests in the ordinary matter and the other is the practice in the ordinary life. This is the result following the optimism that the destiny of human may be possible only under its own practice in the space where we live in.