한자와 한글의 언어적 차이와 교육적 상보성에 관한 고찰－고전 문어와 현행 구어의 의미론적 攝動을 중심으로

Abstract

Chino-Korean classical letters in Korea as the important origin of lexical production in Korean language had not been encounter with the fundamental negation for its significance. Just only the current issues has been proposed that the usage of Chinese letters have to be restrained or prohibited in Korean language performance. The proposal argued the using of perfect genuin Han Geul. So, we should reaffirm the importance of Chin-Korean letters tradition which had been conjoined in the root of Korean language. Nevertheless the current academic trends that have emphasized the position of Chino-Korean letters zooming in the dimension of lexicology has some limitation. This essay would recovered the deep influence of Chino-Korean letters tradition that had been conjoined through a lot of historic periods with the system of Korean language, especially semantic dimension. By these arguments, we proposed two important results, the one is that the Korean scholars in the traditional periods had not recognized Chinese letters as their own language culture or followed Chinese language culture passively, and the other one is that Chino-Korean letters tradition could conjoined with Han Geul successfully.