石川淳の『白描』論 -金吉の「北京征服」の意味について-

Abstract

Japanese militarism expands, and Jun Ishikawa of the writer publishes “Hakubyou” serially in the middle when the brake does not work. He put opposition to convention thought in the root of the literature from “misfortune of Chosuke” of the novel in the first half year. Thereafter the resistance for the thing such as politics, power, order, the community is described clearly, and “mind exercise” is used for his literature as a password of the exercise. Of course a process discovering unfamiliarity to reproduction is vividly pictured in hand Kinkichi Tuzumi of the chief character here by such mind campaign-self-knowledge. I am exposed at a limit tied up by again humanitarian morals without group and they who escaped from Russia including the Liipina wife of the painter led by Dr. Klaus as a person surrounding Kinkichi being got over from the present while flower Bukichi Hanagasa doing not spare help behind does self- knowledge. I regret that I failed to bring up Keiko Itusyoku entrusted late to him with as a Japanese. On the other hand, Keiko aims at the overseas escape in form to part from the uncle of a Japanese relative inheriting a trait or talent. In Daisuke Sakari, he reviews self according to “a law of the space” as a painter from the ground world, and another person of consequence has the morality that is incompatible with current Japan and does the own judgment. He chooses a flower shade as an exhibition written as mind of the self-knowledge as an observer. It was the fact that a child was born to him with a big opportunity of the suicide. By the way, this work had control and the demand of the system, too, and expression did not have the freedom. However, the author resists it well while showing it as if I follow the system by the technique such as “a mechanism” and “the deception”. However, many ideas do not notice the technique of the author and find an advantage of a thing close against the system or the Japanese culture. Because it is a method to deceive a partner, both “the mechanism and” “the deception” hold misfortune forced to expression of the form that contacted with the system by. It must be read as form to completely agree in the system if I have a look. Jun Ishikawa finished writing this work daringly while assuming such a risk. It may be the duty of the literary person to try until I can resist it. However, the word “the Beijing conquest” of Kinkichi makes a reader and completely causes misunderstanding. It may be not to obtain that it stop. In brief, this work did not show an advantage of the Japanese culture and did not follow the power system. When the author groped for possibility opposed to disgusting militarism as perspective here and there in living hand Kinkichi Tuzumi, summer can be called it in 1936. And I fixed my eyes on it if China, Beijing were most suitable as a place of possibility. It is not the thing in the idea, and Beijing is not the ideal ground. It is only a place of new departure that must fight by self-examination of Kinkichi. It may be said that it was the “Hakubyou” that is important to have finished writing the misunderstanding of the reader fearlessly while hiding the intention of such an author in the space between the lines.