본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

복합어의 구조와 생산성에 대한 일한비교연구 -N-VN型 복합명사를 중심으로-

A Comparitive Study on Structure and Pruductivity in Japanese and Korean Complex Words –with a Focus on the N-VN Type Complex Noun-

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

Human language is in process of constant change. Some of them go extinct or form new words temporarily and go extinct either, or they may come into general use. This research aims to describe to the internal structure and productivity of the complex words focusing on word formation. complex words classified into different part of speech such as complex nouns, complex adjectives, complex adverbs according to the head. Among them we analyze the noun complex especially of 「N-VN(verbal Noun)」type. And we clarified their internal structures and the productivity of each structures and by extension, tried to suggest that the internal structure of them correlated with productivity of words. First of all, on the basis of the verbal N2, we analyzed the grammatical relation between N1 and N2, and classified them into several types. According to each type of complex noun’s structure, we analyzed their productivity. The result is that the most productive combination in Japanese and Korean is <theme>N1 structure. And most of all, Type 1-2’s <theme> N1 is the most productive one, which their head is a transitive VN and need two arguments. Unlike Korean, Japanese have few <agent> N1 complex noun. It is the most different part between two languages. Also in diachronic perspective, we considered the internal structure and productivity from two periods which are 1970’s and 2010’s. Within the limit of the research data, we cannot discovered any meaningful changes in structures and the ranking of the productivity. But in case of Japanese, <agent> N1 which was hardly found in 1970’s data become to appear. and also <locative> N1’s percentage increased compared to 1970’s. Meanwhile in Korean, compared to 1970’s, <agent> N1 and <locative>N1’s percentage increased like Japanese. This shows that there is a regular form or way in language change. From these research data we can know that in forming new words, syntactic restrictions are getting loose with time.

Abstract

Human language is in process of constant change. Some of them go extinct or form new words temporarily and go extinct either, or they may come into general use. This research aims to describe to the internal structure and productivity of the complex words focusing on word formation. complex words classified into different part of speech such as complex nouns, complex adjectives, complex adverbs according to the head. Among them we analyze the noun complex especially of 「N-VN(verbal Noun)」type. And we clarified their internal structures and the productivity of each structures and by extension, tried to suggest that the internal structure of them correlated with productivity of words. First of all, on the basis of the verbal N2, we analyzed the grammatical relation between N1 and N2, and classified them into several types. According to each type of complex noun’s structure, we analyzed their productivity. The result is that the most productive combination in Japanese and Korean is <theme>N1 structure. And most of all, Type 1-2’s <theme> N1 is the most productive one, which their head is a transitive VN and need two arguments. Unlike Korean, Japanese have few <agent> N1 complex noun. It is the most different part between two languages. Also in diachronic perspective, we considered the internal structure and productivity from two periods which are 1970’s and 2010’s. Within the limit of the research data, we cannot discovered any meaningful changes in structures and the ranking of the productivity. But in case of Japanese, <agent> N1 which was hardly found in 1970’s data become to appear. and also <locative> N1’s percentage increased compared to 1970’s. Meanwhile in Korean, compared to 1970’s, <agent> N1 and <locative>N1’s percentage increased like Japanese. This shows that there is a regular form or way in language change. From these research data we can know that in forming new words, syntactic restrictions are getting loose with time.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 김인균, "국어의 명사문법Ⅰ" (2005), 역락
  2. 박철우, "국어의 보충어와 부가어 판별 기준", 언어학, (34), pp.75~111 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  3. 서태룡, "修飾語의 修飾 對象과 修飾詞 -「표준국어대사전」의 품사 통용을 해결하기 위해-", 어문연구(語文硏究), 40(4), pp.7~33 (2012), 한국어문교육연구회
  4. 李善雄, "國語 名詞의 論項 및 論項構造 연구를 위한 예비적 考察", 어문연구(語文硏究), 31(3), pp.147~172 (2003), 한국어문교육연구회
  5. 정희정, "한국어명사연구" (2000), 한국문화사
  6. 石井正彦, "現代日本語の複合語形成論" (2007), ひつじ書房
  7. 大島資生, "日本語連体修飾節構造の研究" (2010), ひつじ書房
  8. 奥津敬一郎, "生成日本文法論" (1974), 大修館
  9. 奥津敬一郎, "複合名詞の生成文法", 国語学, (101), pp.19~34 (1975), 国語学会
  10. 影山太郎, "日本語学の新展開", pp.139~166 (1989), くろしお出版
  11. 影山太郎, "文法と語形成" (1993), くろしお出版
  12. 小林英樹, "現代日本語の漢語動名詞の研" (2004), ひつじ書房
  13. 米山三明, "英語学モノグラフシリーズ17 語の意味と意味役割" (2001), 研究社
  14. 島田雅晴, "次世代の言語研究Ⅲ" (2004), 筑波大

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)