일본 제국주의의 그림자로서 ‘파워-에펙트’의 욕망
The desire of 'power-effect' as the shadow of Japanese imperialism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to analyze the process of the formation of the "Imperial Defense Policy" and the characteristics of the transformation process prewar, and to clarify the form of its revival into Japanese society after the war. With the Russo-Japanese War, Japan judged that it had became a member of the international society, and had joined the global ranks of empires. In the process, the 「Imperial Defense Policy」 was finalized. The Imperial Defense Policy was led by Yamagata. That is, the topics of power and benefits were emphasized within the Imperial Defense Policy. The transition was based on relying on the powers of the Empire through the Russo-Japanese War, and attempting to reorganize the geopolitics while pursuing the transition of leadership due to the global fight for supremacy. The epistemic basis was fundamentally based on the 「international affairs-awareness of crisis, 「defined enemy」 and 「peace of the East」 and developed within these frames. Afterwards, the Imperial Defense Policy was revised three times, and during the final revision, the Defense Policy followed the same lines with the Greater East Asian Ideology, and supported the war. As such, Japan after the war faced a new start with the 「democracy and peace」 that was 「developed」, or provided, by the United States in the West. Japan started to develop a defense plan under the protection of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty. It started as 「exclusive defense」 which was also 「passive defense」 that corresponded to the concept of 「domestic defense」 during the prewar days. However, Japan attempted to make a transition to 「dynamic defense」 after 2010, and eventually changed the paradigm with active and offensive reasoning. The potential enemies include China, North Korea and Russia, and Japan is establishing plans to besiege those countries. Despite the sporadic differences before and after the war, the awareness is fundamentally identical. The terminus ad quem is the concept of the 「corridor」 from the Free and Open Indo-Pacific(FOIP) of the Public Diploma, and also rewriting the Imperial Defense Policy. It is the concept of 「globalization=corridor imperialization.」 It is also geopolitical management, and a variation based on the Imperial Defense Policy. Now, the unfamiliar Imperial Defense Policy has shown its goals to expand power to realize the desires of Imperialism under the universal cliche of peace. In addition, with Reiwa as the new Emperor, Japan integrated the tradition=newness of Japan-centrism to develop the variant Japan-centrism through the reorganization of 「corridor=limited area」 under the mask of universalism.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the process of the formation of the "Imperial Defense Policy" and the characteristics of the transformation process prewar, and to clarify the form of its revival into Japanese society after the war. With the Russo-Japanese War, Japan judged that it had became a member of the international society, and had joined the global ranks of empires. In the process, the 「Imperial Defense Policy」 was finalized. The Imperial Defense Policy was led by Yamagata. That is, the topics of power and benefits were emphasized within the Imperial Defense Policy. The transition was based on relying on the powers of the Empire through the Russo-Japanese War, and attempting to reorganize the geopolitics while pursuing the transition of leadership due to the global fight for supremacy. The epistemic basis was fundamentally based on the 「international affairs-awareness of crisis, 「defined enemy」 and 「peace of the East」 and developed within these frames. Afterwards, the Imperial Defense Policy was revised three times, and during the final revision, the Defense Policy followed the same lines with the Greater East Asian Ideology, and supported the war. As such, Japan after the war faced a new start with the 「democracy and peace」 that was 「developed」, or provided, by the United States in the West. Japan started to develop a defense plan under the protection of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty. It started as 「exclusive defense」 which was also 「passive defense」 that corresponded to the concept of 「domestic defense」 during the prewar days. However, Japan attempted to make a transition to 「dynamic defense」 after 2010, and eventually changed the paradigm with active and offensive reasoning. The potential enemies include China, North Korea and Russia, and Japan is establishing plans to besiege those countries. Despite the sporadic differences before and after the war, the awareness is fundamentally identical. The terminus ad quem is the concept of the 「corridor」 from the Free and Open Indo-Pacific(FOIP) of the Public Diploma, and also rewriting the Imperial Defense Policy. It is the concept of 「globalization=corridor imperialization.」 It is also geopolitical management, and a variation based on the Imperial Defense Policy. Now, the unfamiliar Imperial Defense Policy has shown its goals to expand power to realize the desires of Imperialism under the universal cliche of peace. In addition, with Reiwa as the new Emperor, Japan integrated the tradition=newness of Japan-centrism to develop the variant Japan-centrism through the reorganization of 「corridor=limited area」 under the mask of universalism.
참고문헌 (30)
- "러일전쟁의 세기" (2010), 도서출판 소화
- 장형익, "근대 일본의 총력전 구상과 제국국방방침", 군사, (70), pp.197~229 (2009), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 장형익, "일본의 총력전 체제 도입과 전개에 관한 연구 : 1920·30년대 「제국국방방침」을 중심으로", 석사, 군사전략, pp.2009
- 조명철, "일본의 군사전략과 ‘국방방침’의 성립", 日本歴史研究, 5, pp.87~112 (1997), 日本歷史硏究會
- 황병선, "민군관계와 군사전략의 공세성- 1907년 「일본제국국방방침」의 제정을 중심으로 -", 한국군사학논집, 70(2), pp.29~57 (2014), 화랑대연구소[DOI]
- 김현승, "태평양 전쟁은 어떻게 시작되었나?: 미국의 오렌지전쟁계획과 일본의 일본제국국방방침", 合參, (60), pp.90~94 (2014), 합동참모본부
- 岡留康文, "基盤的防衛力構想から動的防衛力へ", 立法と調査, (313), pp.62~76 (2011), 参議院事務局
- 磯前順一, "昭和・平成精神史" (2019), 講談社
- 大山梓, "山県有朋帝国国防方針案", 国際政治, (19), pp.170~177 (1962), 日本国際政治学会
- 藤田賀久, "近代日本の文化事業が目指した理念 : 国益の追求か, 普遍的価値の創造か", 多摩大学紀要, (3), pp.27~38 (2011), 多摩大学グローバルスタディーズ学部
- 鈴木明彦, "2019年日本はこうなる", pp.24~35 (2018), 東洋経済新報社
- 瀧井一博, "日本におけるシュタイン問題へのアプロー", 人文學報, (77), pp.27~62 (1996), 京都大学人文科学研究所
- 栗田昌之, "基盤的防衛力構想の策定とその意義─’70年代の防衛行政における政策と戦略", 公共政策志林, (4), pp.43~58 (2016), 法政大学公共政策研究科
- 朴完, "大正七年帝国国防方針に関する小論", 東京大学日本史学研究室紀要, (17), pp.33~44 (2013), 号東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部日本史学研究室
- 半沢玉城, "国防時論" (1913), 上田屋書店
- 森本真樹, "<国家としての日本と世界>日本の資源外交ボーダーを越えた生命線の獲得", 公共空間, 14, pp.27~30 (2015), 京都大学公共政策大学院公共空間編集委員会
- 小林道彦, "帝国国防方針再考 : 日露戦後における陸海軍の協調", 史学雑誌, 98(4), pp.488~523 (1989), 史学会
- 小林守, "南部経済回廊(ベトナム~カンボジア)のビジネス環境", 専修商学論集, (105), pp.57~66 (2017), 専修大学学会
- 小熊英二, "<民主>と<愛国>" (2003), 新曜社
- 小川伸一, "安保対話, 「日米同盟とアジア太平洋諸国」", 防衛研究所紀要, 1(1), pp.64~82 (1998), 防衛研究所
- 松井佳子, "転換期の南太平洋地域におけるオーストラリア外交", 教職課程センター紀要, (2), pp.259~266 (2017), 大東文化大学教職課程センター事務室
- 柴田陽一, "思想戦と日本地政学", 人文学報, (105), pp.69~116 (2014), 京都大学人文学研究所
- 外務省, "2018年版 開発協力白書 日本の国際協力" (2019), 日経印刷株式会社
- 羽根次郎, "一帯一路構想の地政学的意義の検討", 現代思想, 45(18), pp.98~108 (2017), 青土社
- 村中朋之, "明治期日本における国防戦略転換の背景-朝鮮を利益線とするに至るまで", 日本大学大学院総合社会情報研究科紀要, (5), pp.100~111 (2004), 日本大学大学院総合社会情報研究科
- 平野龍二, "第一次西園寺内閣の国防政策: 軍備拡張の抑制と積極的外交政策", 法学研究, 92(1), pp.279~303 (2019), 慶應義塾大学法学研究会
- 花岡伸也, "東アフリカにおけるクロスボーダー回廊の貨物輸送実態と課題", 交通学研究, (60), pp.79~86 (2017), 交通史学会
- 黒野耐, "帝国国防方針政戦略考", 国際政治, (112), pp.175~188 (1996), 日本国際政治学会
- 黒野耐, "第二次日英同盟と国防方針", 防衛研究所紀要, 5(3), pp.66~95 (2003), 防衛研究所
- 黒川雄三, "国家戦略で読み解く日本近現代史" (2019), 芙蓉書房出版
