한국어의 일본어 가나 표기법에 관한 고찰 - 2023년도 문체부 훈령과 교과서 편수자료를 중심으로 -

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the existing notation regulations for representing Korean in Japanese kana script, as well as to identify the associated challenges and propose potential solutions for improvement. Typically, the Korean language employs Japanese kana alphabet for written communication. Notably, this practice entails utilizing Japanese characters for proper nouns, including geographical locations, personal names, and culinary terms. This convention is mandated by public institutions, as it aligns with the notation regulations prescribed by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, as well as the textbook compilation data provided by the KICE. There exists a fundamental distinction between the Korean and Japanese languages in terms of their phonological and notation systems. Consequently, regardless of the established principles of notation, there are inherent limitations in accurately transcribing Korean into Japanese or its characters. However, it is imperative that regulations adhere to both internal consistency and external coherence, ensuring that they are not only systematic within themselves but also in harmony with other regulations. Unfortunately, numerous existing regulations fail to meet these criteria. The underlying context is that the individuals responsible for implementing each regulation frequently differ from one another, and the interrelationship between affiliated organizations is inadequately established. Moreover, it is noteworthy to highlight the limited expertise possessed by researchers involved in the implementation of regulations, as well as their insufficient comprehension of the corresponding regulatory framework. This study identifies issues pertaining to the recent regulations of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism's directives and textbook compilation data, specifically in relation to public Japanese notation regulations. Subsequently, recommendations for amendments are put forth. Nevertheless, there is an immediate need to bridge the divide between the two nations due to the existing disparity in domestic regulations, which diverge from Japan's regulations on foreign language notation. The utilization of Japanese kana writing in the Korean language exhibits certain characteristics that are relevant to Korean learners, as evidenced by the presence of corresponding textbooks. However, it is widely acknowledged that the significance of these aspects is more pronounced for Japanese learners. Consequently, there is a pressing need for the prompt revision of Japan's foreign language writing regulations, which have remained unchanged for over three decades.