中世後期の抄物資料に見られる叙法副詞の特徴について ─ 「いかにも」 「かえって」 「とても」 「ともこうも」 「なかなか」を例にして ─
A Study on Japanese modal adverbs using Shomono documents of the Late Middle Ages : focusing on the examples of ‘IKANIMO’, ‘KAETTE’, ‘TOTEMO’, ‘TOMOKOMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on exploring grammatical features of Japanese modal adverbs(e.g.‘IKANIMO’, ‘KAETTE’, ‘TOTEMO’, ‘TOMOKOMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’) using Shomono documents of the Late Middle Ages, by comparing with other materials of the same period, for example, the Christian documents ‘Amakusaban Heike Monogatari’ and the Kyogen scripts ‘Toraakirabon’. As a result, from how ‘IKANIMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’ is used in the Kyogen scripts, there are no examples of the interjectional usage or modifying noun predicates in Shomono documents, so it is assumed that the usage range of ‘IKANIMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’ in Shomono documents is relatively narrow. Moreover, ‘KAETTE’, ‘TOTEMO’ are somewhat reluctant to express negative meanings (in terms of desirability) compared to other materials of the same period. In addition, unlike other adverbs, there was no significant difference in the use of ‘TOMOKOMO’ in any of the survey data including Shomono documents. It is assumed that the usage of the five Japanese modal adverbs in the abovementioned may be limited by the material characteristics of Shomono documents: it is basically intended to be used for the interpretation of the Chinese Classics and Buddhist scriptures. Besides, Shomono documents is basically not a conversational format but a oneway lecture format, so it is surmised that there is a restriction that examples of interjectional usage is difficult to use. Furthermore, since the abstracts are lectures with easytounderstand annotations on Chinese Classics and Buddhist scriptures, it seems that the main focus was not on expressing the value judgment and feelings of speaker or writer. This is thought to be related to the fact that Shomono documents is somewhat more negative in indicating negative meanings than other materials. Based on present results, in the future, it is necessary to increase the types of Shomono documents and Japanese modal adverbs. At the same time, it is also necessary to comprehensively analyze a comparative study with a wide range of Christian documents and Kyogen scripts to examine the various aspects of Japanese modal adverbs found in Shomono documents.
Abstract
This paper focuses on exploring grammatical features of Japanese modal adverbs(e.g.‘IKANIMO’, ‘KAETTE’, ‘TOTEMO’, ‘TOMOKOMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’) using Shomono documents of the Late Middle Ages, by comparing with other materials of the same period, for example, the Christian documents ‘Amakusaban Heike Monogatari’ and the Kyogen scripts ‘Toraakirabon’. As a result, from how ‘IKANIMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’ is used in the Kyogen scripts, there are no examples of the interjectional usage or modifying noun predicates in Shomono documents, so it is assumed that the usage range of ‘IKANIMO’, ‘NAKANAKA’ in Shomono documents is relatively narrow. Moreover, ‘KAETTE’, ‘TOTEMO’ are somewhat reluctant to express negative meanings (in terms of desirability) compared to other materials of the same period. In addition, unlike other adverbs, there was no significant difference in the use of ‘TOMOKOMO’ in any of the survey data including Shomono documents. It is assumed that the usage of the five Japanese modal adverbs in the abovementioned may be limited by the material characteristics of Shomono documents: it is basically intended to be used for the interpretation of the Chinese Classics and Buddhist scriptures. Besides, Shomono documents is basically not a conversational format but a oneway lecture format, so it is surmised that there is a restriction that examples of interjectional usage is difficult to use. Furthermore, since the abstracts are lectures with easytounderstand annotations on Chinese Classics and Buddhist scriptures, it seems that the main focus was not on expressing the value judgment and feelings of speaker or writer. This is thought to be related to the fact that Shomono documents is somewhat more negative in indicating negative meanings than other materials. Based on present results, in the future, it is necessary to increase the types of Shomono documents and Japanese modal adverbs. At the same time, it is also necessary to comprehensively analyze a comparative study with a wide range of Christian documents and Kyogen scripts to examine the various aspects of Japanese modal adverbs found in Shomono documents.
참고문헌 (12)
- 安部朋世, "ムシロ・ドチラカトイエバ・カエッテの分析", 千葉大学教育学部研究紀要, 59, pp.241~245 (2011)
- 임지영, "中・近世日本語における副詞の感動詞化 -応答型感動詞用法を例にして-", 일본언어문화, (43), pp.145~158 (2018), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 小田勝, "日本語史要講" (2008), 三恵社
- 川瀬卓, "叙法副詞「なにも」の成立", 日本語の研究, 7(2), pp.32~47 (2011)
- 来田隆, "史記桃源抄の副詞語彙について", 国文学攷(広島大学), 61, pp.20~28 (1973)
- 工藤浩, "叙法副詞の意味と機能―その記述方法をもとめて―", 国立国語研究所研究報告集, 3, pp.45~92 (1982)
- 坪井美樹, "抄物資料におけるオノマトペの役割", 文藝言語研究言語篇(筑波大学), 61, pp.147~158 (2012)
- 朴秀娟, "否定とも肯定とも共起する副詞「とても」について―否定用法に見られる「条件づけ」を中心に―", 阪大日本語研究, 22, pp.43~63 (2010)
- 柳田征司, "日本語の歴史4" (2013), 武蔵野書院
- 山田潔, "抄物語彙語法論考" (2014), 清文堂出版
- 湯澤幸吉郎, "室町時代言語の研究―抄物の語法―" (1955), 風間書房
- 吉井健, "国語副詞の史的研究―「とても」の語史―", 文林, 27, pp.1~30 (1993)
