본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

무용전공생의 진로결정 수준에 영향을 미치는 진로장벽과 진로포부에 대한 실증적 연구

Influence of barrier to course of life and ambition on decision level of life course of dance major students

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류무용

초록

Purpose of this study was to identify influence of barrier to course of life and ambition on decision level of life course and to provide the result to dance major students to help analysing mental, sociological and environmental problems which could be faced with course of life. By using Straified cluster random sampling, 300 university students who major the dance were sampled as subjects through Choonnam, Daejeon and Gangwon area. Questionnaire data were obtained from all subjects by self-administration method, and 291(90.18%) out of 300 cases were used as valid samples. Results of the analysis could be summarized as the following. First, How did barrier to course of life influence to decision level of life course? Influence of skeptical level presented difference that no plan barrier was 0.1%, economic barrier was 1%, circumstance barrier was 5%. Negative level presented difference that no plan barrier and sexual discrimination were 0.1%, negative barrier of workplace was 1%, circumstance barrier were 5%. In the case of helping need level, difference presented that economic barrier was 5% and only factor. Influence to decided level presented difference only in no plan barrier at 5% level. Secondly, How did ambition influence to decision level of life course? Influence of skeptical level presented that no effort ambition was 0.1% and lead ambition was 5%. Negative level presented difference that no effort ambition was only and 0.1%. In the case of helping need level and decided level presented no difference. Third, What are difference of ambition of life course between the major and grade of the sample? Social dance major compared to Korea dance presented high scale in non - endeavor ambition. In the case of Endeavor, Korea dance major presented high scale compare to social dance. Difference of ambition of life course presented higher on 3rd grade than 1,4 grade students. Based on the result, Major influences to barrier to course of life and ambition and grade only influences toambition.

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to identify influence of barrier to course of life and ambition on decision level of life course and to provide the result to dance major students to help analysing mental, sociological and environmental problems which could be faced with course of life. By using Straified cluster random sampling, 300 university students who major the dance were sampled as subjects through Choonnam, Daejeon and Gangwon area. Questionnaire data were obtained from all subjects by self-administration method, and 291(90.18%) out of 300 cases were used as valid samples. Results of the analysis could be summarized as the following. First, How did barrier to course of life influence to decision level of life course? Influence of skeptical level presented difference that no plan barrier was 0.1%, economic barrier was 1%, circumstance barrier was 5%. Negative level presented difference that no plan barrier and sexual discrimination were 0.1%, negative barrier of workplace was 1%, circumstance barrier were 5%. In the case of helping need level, difference presented that economic barrier was 5% and only factor. Influence to decided level presented difference only in no plan barrier at 5% level. Secondly, How did ambition influence to decision level of life course? Influence of skeptical level presented that no effort ambition was 0.1% and lead ambition was 5%. Negative level presented difference that no effort ambition was only and 0.1%. In the case of helping need level and decided level presented no difference. Third, What are difference of ambition of life course between the major and grade of the sample? Social dance major compared to Korea dance presented high scale in non - endeavor ambition. In the case of Endeavor, Korea dance major presented high scale compare to social dance. Difference of ambition of life course presented higher on 3rd grade than 1,4 grade students. Based on the result, Major influences to barrier to course of life and ambition and grade only influences toambition.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 강유리, "무용전공대학생의 취업스트레스가 진로성숙도에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2007
  2. 김선중, "진로장벽, 희망, 진로결정자기효능감이 진로준비행동에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.2005
  3. 김영희, "무용전공 대학생의 무용성취수준이 무용학업적응과 진로결정태도에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.2006
  4. 김주희, "무용전공별 전공만족도와 진로결정수준과의 관계", 석사, pp.2004
  5. 김지영, "진로탐색 On Line 검사지 개발", 건양논총, (14) (2005)
  6. 이은영, "무용에 대한 애착유형이 진로결정태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 교육대학원, pp.2004
  7. 장경아, "무용전공 대학생의 진로 의사결정 유형화가 진로 결정태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2003
  8. 정흥원, "여대생이 지각하는 진로장벽이 진로결정수준에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2002
  9. 조은숙, "무용학과의 전문교육과 취업방안에 관한 연구", 한국무용교육학회지, 17(2), pp.81~93 (2006), 한국무용교육학회
  10. 조재욱, "무용전공자의 진로현황 및 개선방안에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1998
  11. 최수욱, "여대생의 진로포부에 미치는 요인 탐색", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 최영숙, "진로장벽에 직면한 직업복귀 여성의 진로타협 유형 분석", 석사, 행정대학원, pp.2004

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)