<星湖僿說>에 보이는 원류비평 양상(Ⅱ) − 「詩文門」의 詩作品을 중심으로 −

Abstract

『Seonghosaseol(星湖僿說)』 made by Seongho Lee-Ik, was encyclopedic. He has made various efforts in the 「Shimunmun」 for the full understanding of the works of Ch`u-yuan(屈原), Du-Fu(杜甫), Lee-Bai(李白). This is based on the recognition that their work is an example of poetry. He first presented his viewpoint objectively and persuasively based on the contents of various books about the parts that he did not notice or omit in the existing commentary. He also meticulously addressed objective facts about commentary errors. In particular, he has persuasively developed his argument by pointing out the error through the internal relevance of the entire work on general information related to his work He approached the 「Hoesabu(懷沙賦)」 of Ch`u-yuan(屈原) in the flow of 『Chosa(楚辭)』. It was not the work that was built when the dragon was drowned in water, but it was a work that was made with longing for Changsha(長沙). Even in the case of Lee-Bai, ‘Chipo(秋浦)’ was recognized as a proper noun, not a general noun. The ‘Baegbalsamcheonjang(白髮三千丈)’ did not depict itself, but accepted it as a frozen waterfall in the water. This is the meaning of each poet in the whole work. He was the result of the methodology of ‘Iduseogdu(以杜釋杜)’ in the case of Du-Fu and the method of ‘Ileeseoglee(以李釋李)’ in the case of Lee-Bai. He perceived Ch`u-yuan, Du-Fu and Lee-Bai as rules of the poetry and thoroughly explored their works or offered their opinions boldly. This is due to the recognition that the poet's work can be grasped or understood in that context since a correct understanding of the poet's rules must be preceded.