中韩有关涉外夫妻关系冲突规则的比较研究
A Comparative Analysis on the Conflict of Laws of the PRC and the ROK Concerning the Foreign-Related Husband and Wife Relationship
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The choice of law rules in The Act On Private International Law of The ROK, which was partial amended in 2016, concerning the foreign-related husband and wife relationship enjoy three features, an architecture of principles and exceptions is formed, the applying of the laws of the ROK is emphasized, and restricted party autonomy is introduced into the marital property system and the interests of the third party is stressed. The choice of law rules in The Law of the PRC on Choice of Law for Foreignrelated Civil Relationships regarding the foreign-related husband and wife relationship are ambiguously for the following issues, the relationship between the choice of law rule for divorce by agreement, which is article 26, and the choice of law rule for divorce by litigation, which is article 27, the scope of the choice of law rule for the personal relation between husband and wife, which is article 23, and the scope of the choice of law rule for marital property system, which is article 24, and the relationship between the choice of law rule for marital property system and the choice of law rules for property. In order to solve abovementioned issues, on the one hand, The Act On Private International Law of The ROK can be used for reference, in terms of the divorce by litigation, an architecture of principles, which is article 27, and exceptions, which is article 23 or article 24, shall be formed. On the other hand, the scope of article 23 may include the condition for divorce by litigation, the scope of article 24include community debt, in the disputes concerning the marital property, article 24 shall be applied in priority, the relationship between article 26 and article 27 is exception and principle, which means that only when the spouse dissolve the marriage by litigation, provided that there was no agreement for divorce, article 27 may be applied.
Abstract
The choice of law rules in The Act On Private International Law of The ROK, which was partial amended in 2016, concerning the foreign-related husband and wife relationship enjoy three features, an architecture of principles and exceptions is formed, the applying of the laws of the ROK is emphasized, and restricted party autonomy is introduced into the marital property system and the interests of the third party is stressed. The choice of law rules in The Law of the PRC on Choice of Law for Foreignrelated Civil Relationships regarding the foreign-related husband and wife relationship are ambiguously for the following issues, the relationship between the choice of law rule for divorce by agreement, which is article 26, and the choice of law rule for divorce by litigation, which is article 27, the scope of the choice of law rule for the personal relation between husband and wife, which is article 23, and the scope of the choice of law rule for marital property system, which is article 24, and the relationship between the choice of law rule for marital property system and the choice of law rules for property. In order to solve abovementioned issues, on the one hand, The Act On Private International Law of The ROK can be used for reference, in terms of the divorce by litigation, an architecture of principles, which is article 27, and exceptions, which is article 23 or article 24, shall be formed. On the other hand, the scope of article 23 may include the condition for divorce by litigation, the scope of article 24include community debt, in the disputes concerning the marital property, article 24 shall be applied in priority, the relationship between article 26 and article 27 is exception and principle, which means that only when the spouse dissolve the marriage by litigation, provided that there was no agreement for divorce, article 27 may be applied.
참고문헌 (13)
- 许凯, "我国涉外协议离婚法律适用规则的规范修正与适法边界", 载《华东政法大学学报》, (2), pp.129~ (2021)
- 万鄂湘, "<中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法〉条文理解与适用" (2011), 中国法制出版社
- 黄进, "〈中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法〉释义与分析", pp.135~ (2011), 法律出版社
- 夏吟兰, "婚姻家庭继承法" (2017), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王利明, "民法学", pp.957~ (2020), 法律出版社
- 余延满, "亲属法论", pp.253~ (2007), 法律出版社
- 李洪祥, "〈民法典〉夫妻共同债务构成法理基础论", 载《政法论丛》, (1), pp.59~ (2021)
- 邹小琴, "夫妻财产约定制度的司法困境及解决路径", 载《河北法学》, (7), pp.135~ (2021)
- 郭玉军, "涉外民事关系法律适用法中的婚姻家庭法律选择规则", 载《政法论坛》, (3), pp.26~ (2011)
- 宋连斌, "〈涉外民事关系法律适用法〉第24 条的司法应用——基于48 份公开裁判文书的分析", 载《国际法研究》, (1), pp.95~ (2018)
- 王姝, "意思自治原则在涉外婚姻司法实践中的困境与出路——兼评〈中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法〉第24、26 条", 载《法律适用》, (23), pp.113~ (2017)
- 汪金兰, "关于涉外婚姻家庭关系的法律适用立法探讨——兼评〈涉外民事关系法律适用法〉( 草案) 的相关规定", 载《现代法学》, (4), pp.165~ (2010)
- 汪晶, "我国涉外离婚法律适用立法之完善——兼论〈罗马Ⅲ》对我国相关规定的借鉴", 载《湖南社会科学》, (6), pp.92~ (2013)
