3.1운동에 대한 중국의 인식과 반향

Abstract

In the Chinese academic community, the study of the 3.1 movement began in 1958 and became very active after the establishment of diplomatic relations between South Korea and China in 1992. Many of those can be summarized as follows. i.e. a comprehensive study of 3.1 movement; a study of religious figures and bourgeois nationalists in 3.1 movement; a comparative study of 3.1 movement and 5.4 movement; an echo study of 3.1 movement in China, etc. Therefore, issues, and difficulties concerning the field of research of 3.1 sports history are getting deep day by day and have a deeper interpretation and awareness of the 3.1 movement. Chinese scholars evaluate positively and comprehensively. The 3.1 Independence Movement is the beginning of modern Korean history because it has a significant meaning in the history of Korean independence movement, and although the 3.1 Movement was suppressed, it has formed a ferocious and unabated spirit of winning national independence against Japanese. 3.1 Movement has epoch-making significance in the history of Korean independence movement, so it is the beginning of Korean modern history. 3.1 Movement was suppressed, but the spirit of resisting Japanese colonial rule and striving for national independence has not been extinguished. In that sense, the 3.1 movement has never really failed. In a narrow sense, the 5.4 movement effectively called for the dismissal of three people and refusal to sign the Treaty of Versailles, and the activists achieved their purpose without much sacrifice. Although, in a narrow sense, the March 1 Movement did not produce any results, in fact, over a long period of time, both achieved 3.1운동에 대한 중국의 인식과 반향 245 what would be called a “revolution.” It can be said that China at that time became the second battlefield of the Korean independence movement. Many Korean patriots exiled in China, established the interim government of the Republic of Korea in China, and continued their independent activities in China. The 3.1 Movement had an impact on China and triggered the 3.13 Movement. It can be said that the 3.13 Movement was the result of the diffusion of the 3.1 Movement. China’s 3.13 research has also been studied in an active way, with the interest and support of the Chinese party, government and South Korea. 3.1 Movement provides a certain catalytic effect for 5.4 movement, but its role should not be exaggerated. The social background at that time should be considered comprehensively to determine its relationship. South Korea’s 3.1 movement had a direct catalytic effect on China’s 3.13 movement, and also had a catalytic effect on the 5.4 movement.