Comparative Analysis of Publication Patternsin Sciences and Humanities: Based on Bibliometric Data from Korea Citation Index
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order to ascertain disciplinary differences in publication patterns that can help improve assessment of research performance in Korea, we analyzed the bibliometric data of six disciplines from Korea Citation Index. Results showed differences in research size, competitiveness, productivity, impact, and collaboration among disciplines. Disciplines in science were the largest in terms of author and institution followed by humanities and social science, but humanities produced the most publications per author, followed by social science and science disciplines. Sociology publications received most citation per paper but humanities received most citations per author, which was greatly influenced by the number of co-authors per paper. Distribution of author counts per paper varied widely across disciplines. Humanities were dominated by single-author publications, whereas the majority of publications in sciences were co-authored. The study also highlighted differences in citation lag time and illustrated differences in distribution and impact of core authors and institutions across disciplines.
Abstract
In order to ascertain disciplinary differences in publication patterns that can help improve assessment of research performance in Korea, we analyzed the bibliometric data of six disciplines from Korea Citation Index. Results showed differences in research size, competitiveness, productivity, impact, and collaboration among disciplines. Disciplines in science were the largest in terms of author and institution followed by humanities and social science, but humanities produced the most publications per author, followed by social science and science disciplines. Sociology publications received most citation per paper but humanities received most citations per author, which was greatly influenced by the number of co-authors per paper. Distribution of author counts per paper varied widely across disciplines. Humanities were dominated by single-author publications, whereas the majority of publications in sciences were co-authored. The study also highlighted differences in citation lag time and illustrated differences in distribution and impact of core authors and institutions across disciplines.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김기형, "이공계 분야별 연구생산성 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1), pp.98~125 (2015), 한국기술혁신학회
- 김왕준, "국립대학 교수업적평가 관련규정 비교분석", 한국교원교육연구, 29(1), pp.143~165 (2012), 한국교원교육학회[DOI]
- 신다예, "국내 학술논문의 동명이인 저자명 식별을 위한 방법", 한국비블리아학회지, 28(4), pp.301~319 (2017), 한국비블리아학회[DOI]
- Yang, Kiduk, "Looking Beyond the Numbers: Bibliometric Approach to Analysis of LIS Research in Korea", 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(4), pp.241~264 (2015), 한국문헌정보학회[DOI]
- 이재윤, "연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구", 정보관리학회지, 23(3), pp.167~186 (2006), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 이재윤, "A Comparative Analysis on Multiple Authorship Counting for Author Co-citation Analysis", 정보관리학회지, 31(2), pp.57~77 (2014), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 이종욱, "교수연구업적 평가법의 계량적 분석: 국내 문헌정보학과 교수연구업적을 중심으로", 정보관리학회지, 28(4), pp.119~140 (2011), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 이혜경, "국내대학의 학술논문 공동연구 기여도 산정 기준 비교 분석", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 46(4), pp.191~205 (2015), 한국도서관·정보학회[DOI]
- 이혜경, "국내대학의 학술논문 연구업적평가기준 비교 분석", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(2), pp.295~322 (2017), 한국도서관·정보학회[DOI]
- 이혜경, "국내 문헌정보학 분야의 공동연구 동향 분석", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 50(2), pp.191~214 (2019), 한국도서관·정보학회[DOI]
- 정연경, "인문·사회과학 분야 교수의 연구업적물 평가에 관한 연구", Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), pp.211~233 (2011), 한국과학기술정보연구원
- 황유나, "네트워크 분석을 이용한 국내외 대학의 학문분야 비교 분석 - 전기전자 분야와 언론학 분야를 중심으로 -", 비교교육연구, 24(3), pp.227~244 (2014), 한국비교교육학회
- Broadus, R. N., "The literature of the social sciences : A survey of citation studies", International Social Science Journal, 13(2), pp.236~243 (1971)
- Budd, J., "Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature : A citation study", Library & Information Science Research, 8, pp.189~211 (1986)
- Chung, Y. K., "Characteristics of references in international classification systems literature", The Library Quarterly, 65(2), pp.200~215 (1995)
- Glanzel, W., "A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences", Information Processing and Management, 35(3), pp.31~44 (1999)
- Hammarfelt, B., "Research assessment in the humanities", pp.115~131 (2016), Springer
- Heinzkill, R., "Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals", Library Quarterly, 50(3), pp.352~365 (1980)
- Hicks, D., "Handbook of quantitative science and technology research", pp.473~496 (2004), Springer
- Huang, M. H., "Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities : From a research evaluation perspective", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), pp.1819~1828 (2008)
- Knievel, J. E., "Citation analysis for collection development : A comparative study of eight humanities fields", The Library Quarterly, 75(2), pp.142~168 (2005)
- 민태선, "생명과학분야의 분야별 연구인력 및 연구성과 분석", 한국축산학회지, 48(1), pp.131~136 (2006), 한국축산학회
- Nederhof, A. J., "Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities : A review", Scientometrics, 66(1), pp.81~100 (2006)
- Ochsner, M., "The future of research assessment in the humanities : bottom-up assessment procedures", Palgrave Communications, 3, pp.17020~ (2017)
- Reingold, E. M., "Tidier drawings of trees", IEEE Transactions on software Engineering, 2, pp.223~228 (1981)
- Robinson, W. C., "Literature use by U.S. economists published in 1999: An exploratory study", Behavioral and Social Science Libraries, 22(2), pp.53~65 (2004)
- Schaffer, T., "Psychology citations revisited : Behavioral research in the age of electronic resources", Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), pp.354~360 (2004)
- "An analysis of the Arts and Humanities submitted research outputs to REF 2014 with a focus on academic books" (2016)[URL]
- Thompson, J. W., "The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship", Libri, 52, pp.121~136 (2002)
- Toledo, E. G., "Research assessment in Humanities and Social Sciences in review", Revista española de Documentación Científica, 41(3), pp.1~14 (2018)
- Yang, K., "Analysis of publication patterns in Korean library and information science research", Scientometrics, 93(2), pp.233~251 (2012)
- Yang, K., "Publication and citation patterns of Korean LIS research by subject areas", Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 21(2), pp.67~81 (2016)
- 윤희윤, "학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석", Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 36(3), pp.1~25 (2005), 한국과학기술정보연구원