Team Size Patterns of Korean and International Journal Articles in Library and Information Science
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to measure the extent of collaboration by comparing team size patterns of Korean LIS journals with international LIS journals. For the sample dataset, the top 30 ranked international journals in the field of LIS were selected using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), and 4 Korean LIS journals were selected for the years between 2010-2016. The size of the team who authored Korean journal articles were collected from the RISS database, while the size of team who authored international journal articles from the top LIS journals were collected using the Scopus database. The result of this study shows that the most common team size ranged from one member team to three member teams. Overall, the collaborative team size in international journals was higher than Korean journals. In particular, one member team was the most common team size in Korean journals, whereas two members team was most common in the international journals. At the subject level, the most common team size was one team member in the subject area of Library Related, while the most common team size was three team members in the subject area of Science/Engineering. The result of this study suggests that within LIS, the size of teams may vary considerably due to differences in subject areas.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to measure the extent of collaboration by comparing team size patterns of Korean LIS journals with international LIS journals. For the sample dataset, the top 30 ranked international journals in the field of LIS were selected using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), and 4 Korean LIS journals were selected for the years between 2010-2016. The size of the team who authored Korean journal articles were collected from the RISS database, while the size of team who authored international journal articles from the top LIS journals were collected using the Scopus database. The result of this study shows that the most common team size ranged from one member team to three member teams. Overall, the collaborative team size in international journals was higher than Korean journals. In particular, one member team was the most common team size in Korean journals, whereas two members team was most common in the international journals. At the subject level, the most common team size was one team member in the subject area of Library Related, while the most common team size was three team members in the subject area of Science/Engineering. The result of this study suggests that within LIS, the size of teams may vary considerably due to differences in subject areas.
참고문헌 (19)
- Abrizah, "LIS Journals Scientific Impact and Subject Categorization: A Comparison Between Web of Science and Scopus", Scientometrics, 94(2), pp.721~740 (2013)
- Dang, Wilfred, "A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals", PloS One, 10(9), pp.e0139005~ (2015)
- Fernandes, João M., "Authorship Trends in Software Engineering", Scientometrics, 101(1), pp.257~271 (2014)
- Franceschet, Massimo, "The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers", Journal of informetrics, 4(4), pp.540~553 (2010)
- Gazni, Ali, "Mapping World Scientific Collaboration: Authors, Institutions, and Countries", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), pp.323~335 (2012)
- Grossman, Jerrold W., "Patterns of Collaboration in Mathematical Research", SIAM News, 35(9), pp.8~9 (2002)
- Han, Pu, "International Collaboration in LIS: Global Trends and Networks at the Country and Institution Level", Scientometrics, 98(1), pp.53~72 (2014)
- Hart, Richard L., "Collaboration and Article Quality in the Literature of Academic Librarianship", The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), pp.190~195 (2007)
- Katz, Sylvan J, "What is Research Collaboration?", Research Policy, 26(1), pp.1~18 (1997)
- Kim, Eungi, "A Comparative Analysis on Keywords of International and Korean Journals in Library and Information Science", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(1), pp.207~225 (2017), 한국도서관·정보학회[DOI]
- Laudel, Grit, "What Do We Measure By Co-Team Sizes?", Research Evaluation, 11(1), pp.3~15 (2002)
- Mani, K. Thavamani, "Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1996-2012", Library Philosophy and Practice, 1 (2014)
- Manton, Edgar J, "The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Business Journals", Journal of Education for Business, 82(3), pp.164~168 (2007)
- Milojević, Staša, "Information Metrics (iMetrics): A Research Specialty with a Socio-Cognitive Identity?", Scientometrics, 95(1), pp.141~157 (2013)
- Milojević, Staša, "Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), pp.3984~3989 (2014)
- Petersen, Alexander M, "A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science", Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), pp.923~945 (2014)
- 서은경, "계량정보학적 분석을 통한 「한국비블리아학회지」 최근 연구동향 분석 - 한국문헌정보학회지·정보관리학회지와 비교하여 -", 한국비블리아학회지, 26(3), pp.315~343 (2015), 한국비블리아학회[DOI]
- Sin, Sei Ching Joanna, "International Coauthorship and Citation Impact: A Bibliometric ‐ Study of Six LIS Journals, 1980 2008", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 9(62), pp.1770~1783 (2008)
- Wuchty, Stefan, "The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge", Science, 316(5827), pp.1036~1039 (2007)