본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Convergence towards the Revealed Comparative Advantage Neutral Point for East Asia: Similarities and Differences between the Three Countries

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

The aim of this study is to use two main revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indices (Balassa’s and the most recent “normalized” indices) and various quantitative techniques in order to systemically and rigorously draw some conclusions as to comparative advantage (CA) of the three East Asian countries. We use both HS 2-digit and 4-digit data to see how the three countries perform in RCA from 1995 to 2008. Overall, we find that there still exists a strict hierarchy in terms of CA in the three East Asian countries, although there is also a catching up process between them with a convergence towards a more competitive structure of RCA in exports. This mainly means that Japan and Korea are already in the process of converging towards the RCA neutral point (thus sectors that had RCA in 1995 get worse and sectors that did not have RCA in 1995 get better). However, China’s position is still different from that of the other two countries (overall it might still be in the process of divergence).

Abstract

The aim of this study is to use two main revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indices (Balassa’s and the most recent “normalized” indices) and various quantitative techniques in order to systemically and rigorously draw some conclusions as to comparative advantage (CA) of the three East Asian countries. We use both HS 2-digit and 4-digit data to see how the three countries perform in RCA from 1995 to 2008. Overall, we find that there still exists a strict hierarchy in terms of CA in the three East Asian countries, although there is also a catching up process between them with a convergence towards a more competitive structure of RCA in exports. This mainly means that Japan and Korea are already in the process of converging towards the RCA neutral point (thus sectors that had RCA in 1995 get worse and sectors that did not have RCA in 1995 get better). However, China’s position is still different from that of the other two countries (overall it might still be in the process of divergence).

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Acharya, R. C, "Analysing International Trade Patterns: Comparative Advantage for the World’s Major Economies", Journal of Comparative International Management, 11(2), pp.33~53 (2008)
  2. Alan G. Ahearne, "China and Emerging Asia: Comrades or Competitors", Seoul Journal of Economics, 16(2), pp.183~213 (2003), 경제연구소
  3. Balassa, B, "Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage", The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), pp.99~123 (1965)
  4. Ballance, R. H., "Consistency Tests of Alternative Measures of Comparative Advantage", Review of Economics & Statistics, 69(1), pp.157~161 (1987)
  5. Bliss, C, "Galton’s Fallacy and Economic Convergence: A Reply to Cannon and Duck", Oxford Economic Papers, 52(2), pp.420~422 (2000)
  6. Cantwell, J, "Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations" (1989), Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  7. Dalum, B., "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: De-specialisation and `Stickiness'", International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), pp.423~443 (1998)
  8. De Benedictis, L., "Overall Specialization Empirics: Techniques and Applications", Open Economics Review, 15(4), pp.323~346 (2004)
  9. De Benedictis, L., "Overall Trade Specialization and Economic Development: Countries Diversify", Review of World Economics, 145(1), pp.37~55 (2009)
  10. Ferto, I., "Trade Specialization in the European Union and in Postcommunist European Countries", Eastern European Economics, 46(3), pp.5~28 (2008)
  11. Frantzen, D, "Technology, Competitiveness and Specialisation in OECD Manufacturing", Journal of Economic Studies, 35(1), pp.44~68 (2008)
  12. Galton, F, "Natural Inheritance" (1889), Macmillan
  13. Ha, N. T, "Catching-up Industrial Development of East Asian Economies and Its Application to Vietnam", The Journal of Developing Areas, 39(1), pp.71~98 (2005)
  14. Hart, P. E, "The Convergence of Labour Productivity in British and German Industries", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2(3), pp.453~464 (1995)
  15. Hillman, A. L, "Observations on the Relation between ‘Revealed Com- parative Advantage' and Comparative Advantage as Indicated by Pre-trade Relative Prices", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 116(2), pp.315~321 (1980)
  16. Hiratsuka, D, "East Asia’s de Facto Economic Integration" (2006), Palgrave Macmillan
  17. Hummels, D., "Product Differentiation as a Source of Comparative Advantage", American Economic Review, 83(2), pp.445~449 (1993)
  18. INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE, "PC-TAS HS Rev.0 1995-1999" (2000), International Trade Centre
  19. INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE, "PC-TAS HS Rev.1 1998-2002" (2003), International Trade Centre
  20. INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE, "PC-TAS HS Rev.2 2003-2007" (2008), International Trade Centre
  21. Comparative Advantage in Japan, Korea and Taiwan between 1980 and 1996: Testing for Convergence and Implications for Closer Economic Relations, "James, W", ICSEAD (International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development), ~ (2000)
  22. Krugman, P, "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and Inter- national Trade", Journal of International Economics, 9(4), pp.469~479 (1979)
  23. 곽노선, "Long-Run Comparative Advantage and Transitional Dynamics after Free Trade in an Endogenous Growth Model", Seoul Journal of Economics, 18(2), pp.173~203 (2005), 경제연구소
  24. Sim-Yee Lau, "CHINA, JAPAN AND KOREA: PROSPECTS FOR ENHANCING CLOSER ECONOMIC RELATIONS", Global Economic Review, 32(1), pp.3~20 (2003), 동서문제연구원
  25. Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation, "Laursen, K", DRUID, ~ (1998)
  26. Liesner, H. H, "The European Common Market and British Industry", The Economic Journal, 68(270), pp.302~316 (1958)
  27. Palley, T. I, "Institutionalism and New Trade Theory: Rethinking Com- parative Advantage and Trade Policy", Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economics), 42(1), pp.195~208 (2008)
  28. Rousseeuw, R., "Robust Regression and Outlier Detection" (1987), Wiley
  29. Sanidas, E, "Patterns and Distances of Catch-up in Trade: China and East Asia", China Economic Journal, 2(1), pp.105~118 (2009)
  30. Sanidas, E., "Comparison of Revealed Comparative Advan- tage Indices with Application to Trade Tendencies of East Asian Countries", the 9th Korea and the World Economy Conference, Incheon (2010)
  31. Seyoum, B, "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Services: A Study with Special Emphasis on Developing Coun- tries", Journal of Economic Studies, 34(5), pp.376~388 (2007)
  32. Abhijit Sharma, "The Structure and Composition of India's Exports and Industrial Transformation (1980-2000)", International Economic Journal, 21(2), pp.207~231 (2007), 한국국제경제학회
  33. Tybout, J, "Internal Returns to Scale as a Source of Comparative Advan- tage: the Evidence", The American Economic Review, 83(2), pp.440~444 (1993)
  34. Vollrath, T, "A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(2), pp.265~280 (1991)
  35. Wörz, J, "Dynamics of Trade Specialization in Developed and Less Developed Countries", Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 41(3), pp.92~111 (2005)
  36. Yeats, A, "On the Appropriate Interpretation of the Revealed Comparative Advantage Index: Implications of a Methodology Based on Industry Sector Analysis", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 121(1), pp.61~73 (1985)
  37. Yoon, C.-I., "Comparative Advantage of the Services and Manufacturing Industries of Korea, China and Japan and Im- plication of Its FTA Policy", Proceedings of the Conference “Korea and the World Economy (2006), Korea University
  38. Yu, R., "The Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage Index", Annals of Regional Science, 43(1), pp.267~282 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)