본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Comparative Advantage of Korea and China by Technology Level

4

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, we examine the comparative advantage of Korea and China while focusing on their technology level. The three digit SITC (Standard International Trade Classification) data is classified by technology level and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) is derived from 1992-2009 by using UN COMTRADE data. For careful interpretation of the comparative advantage and technology levels, we also examined intra-industry trade and unit values of bilateral Korea-China trade, and semi-conductor industry technology. We found that the revealed comparative advantage has moved from low technology products to high technology products in Korea. China still maintains a comparative advantage in low technology products such as textiles and clothing, but at the same time, China’s high and medium-high technology products have recently gained a comparative advantage. The perception that China only has a comparative advantage for labor intensive products with low technology should be changed based on our analysis. However, China’s advancement in technology should not be overestimated. When comparing the unit value of basic materials of Korea’s and China’s exports, we found that Korea’s export product prices are on average higher than that of China’s, although the gap is reducing. A wider technology gap between Korea and China still exists in the semi-conductor industry, which is one of the most advanced high technology industries throughout the world.

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the comparative advantage of Korea and China while focusing on their technology level. The three digit SITC (Standard International Trade Classification) data is classified by technology level and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) is derived from 1992-2009 by using UN COMTRADE data. For careful interpretation of the comparative advantage and technology levels, we also examined intra-industry trade and unit values of bilateral Korea-China trade, and semi-conductor industry technology. We found that the revealed comparative advantage has moved from low technology products to high technology products in Korea. China still maintains a comparative advantage in low technology products such as textiles and clothing, but at the same time, China’s high and medium-high technology products have recently gained a comparative advantage. The perception that China only has a comparative advantage for labor intensive products with low technology should be changed based on our analysis. However, China’s advancement in technology should not be overestimated. When comparing the unit value of basic materials of Korea’s and China’s exports, we found that Korea’s export product prices are on average higher than that of China’s, although the gap is reducing. A wider technology gap between Korea and China still exists in the semi-conductor industry, which is one of the most advanced high technology industries throughout the world.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Balassa B, "Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage", Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), pp.99~123 (1965)
  2. Brasili Andrea, "On the Dynamics of Trade Patterns", DeEconomist, 148(2) (2000)
  3. Dalum Bent, "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: De-Specialisation and stickiness", International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3) (1998)
  4. Grubel H. G, "Intra-Industry Trade" (1975), London:TheMaCmillanPress,ltd
  5. Hecketh, B, "Intra-Industry Trade Specialisation in South-East Asia", 석사, pp.1973
  6. Jung Taik Hyun, "The rise of China: to whom is it scary?", Journal of Intl Logistics and Trade, 5(2), pp.23~44 (2007), 정석물류통상연구원
  7. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, "Medium and Long Term Technology Development Plan", ~ (2010)
  8. Yarbrough Beth V, "The World Economy: Trade and Finance, Mason", pp.2006, OH:Thomson
  9. "OECD STAN DB"[URL]
  10. "UN COMTRADE"[URL]
  11. "UN Statistics Division"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)