본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On the Viability of Indigenous Methodologies: Implications for Southeast Asian Studies

Rommel A. Curaming
아세안연구원 (Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies)|2016.06|SUVANNABHUMI|제8권 제1호|pp. 55-76|DOI 10.22801/svn.2016.8.1.55

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

methodologyIndigenousSoutheast Asian Studiesarea studiesKaupapa MaoriSikolohiyang Pilipino

초록

In this paper, I offer a reflection on two cases to assess in preliminary manner the viability of an indigenous methodology for Southeast Asian Studies. The first is Kaupapa Maori Research (hereafter KM) as spelt out in the much talked about book by Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People (Smith 1999). The second case is Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology, SP), which began to take shape in the late 1960’s and 1970’s in the Philippines. Arguably these are among the most developed efforts at decolonization or indigenization of methodology. I intend to use these cases to explore the factors that made possible the flourishing and stagnating of indigenous methodologies. I shall argue that the broader context of knowledge consumption, not epistemological and methodological concerns, poses the most formidable challenge to the viability of indigenization efforts.

Abstract

In this paper, I offer a reflection on two cases to assess in preliminary manner the viability of an indigenous methodology for Southeast Asian Studies. The first is Kaupapa Maori Research (hereafter KM) as spelt out in the much talked about book by Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People (Smith 1999). The second case is Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology, SP), which began to take shape in the late 1960’s and 1970’s in the Philippines. Arguably these are among the most developed efforts at decolonization or indigenization of methodology. I intend to use these cases to explore the factors that made possible the flourishing and stagnating of indigenous methodologies. I shall argue that the broader context of knowledge consumption, not epistemological and methodological concerns, poses the most formidable challenge to the viability of indigenization efforts.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Some Problems of Indigenization, "Alatas, Farid", Dept. of Sociology, National University of Singapore, ~, pp.Working Papers No. 114 (1992)
  2. The Discourse on Indigenisation: Definitions, Criteria, and Pitfalls, "Alatas, Farid", Pagesetters Services PTE LTD for Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore, ~, pp.CAS Research Paper Series No. 17 (1999)
  3. Alatas, Farid, "Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism" (2006), Sage Publications
  4. Alatas, Hussein, "The Captive Mind in Development Studies", International Social Science Journal, 34(1), pp.9~25 (1972)
  5. Alatas, Hussein, "Intellectuals in Developing Societies" (1977), Cass
  6. Alatas, Syed Farid, "Alternative Discourses in Southeast Asia", Sari, 19, pp.49~67 (2001)
  7. Alfred, Gerald Taiaiake, "Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto" (1999), Oxford University Press
  8. Allwood, Carl Martin, "Origins and Development of Indigenous Psychologies: An International Analysis", International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), pp.243~268 (2006)
  9. Appadurai, Arjun, "Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization" (1996), University of Minnesota Press
  10. Globalization and Area Studies: The Future of a False Opposition, "Appadurai, Arjun", Centre for Asian Studies Amsterdam, ~ (2000)
  11. Baker, David B., "The Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology: Global Perspectives" (2012), Oxford University Press
  12. Bates, Robert, "Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?", PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(2), pp.166~169 (1997)
  13. Bautista, Cynthia, "The Social Sciences in the Philippines:Reflections on Trends and Developments", Philippine Studies, 48(2), pp.175~208 (2000)
  14. Belgrave, Michael, "Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of" (2005), Oxford University Press
  15. Bishop, R., "Ha Kanohi Kitea: Conducting and Evaluating Educational Research", New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 27(2), pp.125~135 (1992)
  16. Bourdieu, Pierre, "The Scholastic Point of View", Cultural Anthropology, 5(4), pp.380~391 (1990)
  17. Burgess, Chris, "The Asian Studies 'Crisis': Putting Cultural Studies into Asian Studies and Asia into Cultural Studies", The International Journal of Asian Studies, 1(1), pp.121~136 (2004)
  18. Chakrabarty, Dipesh, "Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference" (2000), Princeton University Press
  19. Church, A. Timothy, "Indigenization of Psychology in the Philippines", International Journal of Psychology, 37(3), pp.129~148 (2002)
  20. Covar, Prospero, "Pilipinolohiya: Kasaysayan, Pilosopiya at Pananaliksik" (1991), Kalikasan Press
  21. Enriquez, Virgilio, "Indigenous Psychology and National Consciousness", Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, ~ (1989)
  22. Enriquez, Virgilio, "From Colonial to Liberation Psychology" (1992), University of the Philippines Press
  23. Fabish, Rachael, "The Impact of Tā Te Māori Rangahau", Methodologies of Māori Research on My Work, 2016, pp.(2), ~
  24. Finlay, Len, "Always Indigenize! The Radical Humanities in the Postcolonial Canadian University", ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 31(1 & 2), pp.307~326 (2000)
  25. Goh, Beng Lan, "Southeast Asian Perspectives on Area Studies in a Global Age", Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(Special), pp.45~61 (2010)
  26. Decentring & Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region, "Goh Beng Lan", Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, ~ (2011)
  27. Hill, Elina, "A Critique of the Call to ‘Always Indigenize!’", Peninsula: A Journal of Relational Politics, 2(1) (2012)
  28. Huotari, Mikko, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies" (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  29. Hudson, Maui L, "The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa", Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 6(1), pp.61~68 (2009)
  30. Jackson, Peter A, "Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies", Sojourn:Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18(1), pp.1~41 (2003)
  31. Jahoda, Gustav, "On the Rise and Decline of ’Indigenous Psychology", Culture & Psychology, 22(2), pp.169~181 (2016)
  32. Kellner, Douglas, "Theorizing Globalization", Sociological Theory, 20(3), pp.285~305 (2002)
  33. Outsider 74Debate. Frontiers of Anthropology, "Emics and Etics: The Insider", pp.1990, Lett, J.
  34. Macedo, Donaldo, "What Is Indigenous Knowledge?: Voices from the Academy" (1999), Falmer Press
  35. Mahuika, Ragimarie, "Kaupapa Rangahu: A Reader", pp.34~45 (2015), University of Auckland
  36. Mendoza, S. Lily, "Mga Babasahin Sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya, at Pantayong Pananaw", pp.241~297 (2007), C & E Publications
  37. Mignolo, Walter, "Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom", Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), pp.159~181 (2009)
  38. Mignolo, Walter, "Epistemic Disobedience and the Decolonial Option: A Manifesto", Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2) (2011)
  39. Mihesuah, Devon A., "American Indians: Stereotypes & Realities" (1996), Clarity
  40. Mihesuah, Devon A., "Natives and Academics: Researching and Writing About American Indians" (1998), University of Nebraska Press
  41. Mihesuah, Devon A., "Indigenizing the Academy: Transforming Scholarship and Empowering Communities" (2004), University of Nebraska Press
  42. An Introduction to Southeast Asian Studies, "Mohammed Halib", Tauris Academic Studies, ~ (1996)
  43. Navarro, Atoy, "Mga Babasahin Sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya, at Pantayong Pananaw" (2007), C & E Publications
  44. Navarro, Atoy, "Pantayong Pananaw: Ugat at Kabuluhan: Pambungad Sa Pag-Aaral Ng Bagong Kasaysayan" (1997), Palimbagang Kalawakan
  45. Pe-Pua, Rogelia, "Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo at Gamit (Filipino Psychology: Theory, Method and Application)", Surian ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino, ~ (1982)
  46. Pe-Pua, Rogelia, "Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology): A Legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), pp.49~70 (2000)
  47. Pihama, Leonie, "Kaupapa Rangahau: A Reader", pp.7~17 (2015), University of Auckland
  48. Pihama, Leonie, "A Literature Review on Kaupapa Maori and Maori Education Pedagogy", University of Auckland, ~ (2004)
  49. Rodriguez-Tatel, Jane, "Philippine Stud ies", Araling Pilipino, Araling Pilipino, pp.Pilipinolohiya in Filipino: Redefining Context and Concept within the Filipino Scholarly Tradition), Humanities Diliman[DOI]
  50. Rutland, Peter, "Remapping the World After the Crisis in Area Studies", Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10(1), pp.129~136 (2001)
  51. Said, Edward W., "Orientalism" (1978), Routledge And Kegan Paul
  52. Salazar, Zeus, "The Pantayo Perspective as a Discourse Towards Kabihasnan", Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science (Now Asian Journal of Social Science), 28(1), pp.123~152 (2000)
  53. Semali, Ladislaus, "What Is Indigenous Knowledge?: Voices from the Academy" (1999), Falmer Press
  54. Sinha, D, "Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and Method", pp.129~169 (1997), Allyn & Bacon
  55. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai, "Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples" (1999), Zed Books ; University of Otago Press; St Martin’s Press
  56. Sta Maria, Madelene, "Indigenous Psychology, Ethnopsychology, Cross-Cultural Psychology and Cultural Psychology: Distinction Implications for Sikolohiyang Pilipino", Asia Pacific Social Science Review, 1(1), pp.11~22 (2000)
  57. Steedly, Mary, "The State of Culture Theory in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia", Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, pp.43~454 (1999)
  58. Szanton, David L., "Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines", pp.1~33 (2004), University of California Press
  59. Tiakiwai, Sarah-Jane, "Kaupapa Rangahau: A Reader" (2015), The University of Auckland
  60. Tolich, Martin, "Pakeha ‘Paralysis’: Cultural Safety for Those Researching the General Population of Aotearoa", Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, (19), pp.164~178 (2002)
  61. van Schendel, Willem, "Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia", Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20(6), pp.647~668 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Exploring Southeast Asian Studies beyond Anglo-America: Reflections on the Idea of Positionality in Filipino ThoughtPreciosa Regina de Joya아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2019 · 제11권 제1호Approaches in Southeast Asian Studies: Developing Post-colonial Theories in Area StudiesCahyo Pamungkas아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2015 · 제7권 제1호Postcolonial Criticism and Southeast Asian Studies: Pitfalls, Retreat, and Unfulfilled PromisesRommel A. Curaming아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2015 · 제7권 제2호Epistemic Reflexivity and its Applications to Southeast Asian Studies김예겸아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2021 · 제13권 제1호Southeast Asians as Southeast Asianists Promoting and Nurturing Home-grown ScholarshipChi P. Pham, OOI Keat Gin아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2024 · 제16권 제2호Southeast Asia and Southeast Asian Studies: Issues in Multidisciplinary Studies and MethodologyVictor T. King아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2015 · 제7권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Revisiting and Reconstructing Southeast Asian CharacteristicsVictor T. Kingpp. 7-13Southeast Asian Studies: Insiders and Outsiders, or is Culture and Identity a Way Forward?Victor T. Kingpp. 17-53A Holistic View of the Japanese Occupation of Southeast AsiaFrank Dhontpp. 77-94Southeast Asia in Japan’s Spiritual Market: The Sacralization of ExoticismIoannis Gaitanidispp. 95-119Taking Expedience Seriously: Reinterpreting Furnivall’s Southeast Asia스티븐 퀙pp. 121-146
원문 보기