본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Southeast Asia and Southeast Asian Studies: Issues in Multidisciplinary Studies and Methodology

Victor T. King
아세안연구원 (Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies)|2015.06|SUVANNABHUMI|제7권 제1호|pp. 13-57|DOI 10.22801/svn.2015.7.1.13

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

RegionMethodologySoutheast Asian StudiesDisciplinesConundrum

초록

The paper brings together several strands of debate and deliberation in which I have been involved since the early 2000s on the definition of Southeast Asia and the rationale of Southeast Asian Studies. I refer to the relationship between area studies and methodologies as a conundrum (or puzzle), though I should state from the outset that I think it is much more of a conundrum for others than for me. I have not felt the need to pose the question of whether or not area studies generates a distinctive method or set of methods and research practices, because I operate from a disciplinary perspective; though that it is not to say that the question should not be posed. Indeed, as I have earned a reputation for “revisionism” and championing disciplinary approaches rather than regional ones, it might be anticipated already the position that I take in an examination of the relationships between methodologies and the practice of “area studies” (and in this case Southeast Asian [or Asian] Studies). Nevertheless, given the recent resurgence of interest in the possibilities provided by the adoption of regional perspectives and the grounding of data gathering and analysis within specified locations in the context of globalization, the issues raised for researchers working in Southeast Asia and within the field of Southeast Asian Studies require revisiting.

Abstract

The paper brings together several strands of debate and deliberation in which I have been involved since the early 2000s on the definition of Southeast Asia and the rationale of Southeast Asian Studies. I refer to the relationship between area studies and methodologies as a conundrum (or puzzle), though I should state from the outset that I think it is much more of a conundrum for others than for me. I have not felt the need to pose the question of whether or not area studies generates a distinctive method or set of methods and research practices, because I operate from a disciplinary perspective; though that it is not to say that the question should not be posed. Indeed, as I have earned a reputation for “revisionism” and championing disciplinary approaches rather than regional ones, it might be anticipated already the position that I take in an examination of the relationships between methodologies and the practice of “area studies” (and in this case Southeast Asian [or Asian] Studies). Nevertheless, given the recent resurgence of interest in the possibilities provided by the adoption of regional perspectives and the grounding of data gathering and analysis within specified locations in the context of globalization, the issues raised for researchers working in Southeast Asia and within the field of Southeast Asian Studies require revisiting.

참고문헌 (88)

  1. Ananda Rajah, "Southeast Asia: Comparatist Errors and the Construction of a Region", Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, pp.41~53 (1999)
  2. Andaya, Barbara Watson, "The Unity of Southeast Asia:Historical Approaches and Questions", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 28, pp.161~171 (1997)
  3. Anderson, Benedict, "Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America", pp.25~40 (1992), The Association for Asian Studies
  4. Barnett, Tony, "Rethinking Social Development", pp.226~250 (1994), Longman Scientific and Technical
  5. Bonura, Carlo, "Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects", pp.3~34 (2007), University of Washington Press, NUS Press
  6. Bowen, John R, "The Forms Culture takes: a State-of-thefield Essay on the Anthropology of Southeast Asia", The Journal of Asian Studies, 54, pp.1047~1078 (1995)
  7. Bowen, John R, "The Inseparability of Area and Ddiscipline in Southeast Asian Studies: a View from the United States", Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l’Asie du Sud-Est, 1, pp.3~19 (2000)
  8. Bowen, John R, "The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines", pp.386~427 (2004), Berkeley:University of California Press
  9. Burgess, Chris, "The Asian Studies “Crisis”: Putting Cultural Studies into Asian Studies and Asia into Cultural Studies", International Journal of Asian Studies, 1, pp.121~136 (2004)
  10. Caplan, Pat, "The Ethics of Anthropology. Debates and Dilemmas" (2003), Routledge
  11. Chou, Cynthia, "Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions" (2006), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, International Institute for Asian Studies
  12. Chou, Cynthia, "Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions", pp.1~22 (2006), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, International Institute for Asian Studies
  13. Chua Beng Huat, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.273~288 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Dick, Howard, "Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space", pp.250~274 (2005), Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press
  15. Edmond, Jacob, "Recentring Asia; Histories, Encounters, Identities" (2011), Global Oriental
  16. Edmond, Jacob, "Recentring Asia; Histories, Encounters, Identities", pp.1~9 (2011), Global Oriental
  17. Ellen, R. F., "A Guide to General Conduct" (1984), Academic Press
  18. Evans, Grant, "Between the Global and the Local there are Regions, Culture Areas and National States: a Review Article", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 33, pp.147~161 (2002)
  19. Fifield, Russell H, "Southeast Asian Studies: Origins, Development, Future", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 7, pp.154~161 (1976)
  20. Fifield, Russell H, "Southeast Asia as a Regional Concept", Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 11, pp.1~14 (1983)
  21. Goh Beng Lan, "Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region", pp.1~59 (2011), ISEAS Publishing
  22. Goh Beng Lan, "Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies:Perspectives from the Region" (2011), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  23. Goh Beng Lan, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.27~43 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  24. Goss, Jon, "Remaking Area Studies: Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific", pp.9~27 (2010), University of Hawai’i Press
  25. Harris, Olivia, "Grasping the Changing World:Anthropological Concepts in a Postmodern Era", pp.1~16 (1996), Routledge
  26. Heryanto, Ariel, "Can There be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies? Moussons", Recherche en sciences humaines sur l'Asie du Sud-Est, 5, pp.3~30 (2002)
  27. Heryanto, Ariel, "Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects", pp.75~108 (2007), University of Washington Press, NUS Press
  28. Hirschman, Charles, "Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America", pp.41~58 (1992), The Association for Asian Studies
  29. Hirschman, Charles, "The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology, vol. 9", pp.4374~4380 (2007), Blackwell Publishing
  30. Holy, Ladislav, "Ethnographic Research. A Guide to General Conduct", pp.13~34 (1984), Academic Press
  31. Mikko Huotari, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.1~24 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  32. Mikko Huotari, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies" (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  33. Jackson, Peter, A, "Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies", Sojourn. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18, pp.1~41 (2003)
  34. Jackson, Peter, A, "Mapping Poststructuralism's Borders: The Case for Poststructuralist Area Studies", Sojourn. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18, pp.42~88 (2003)
  35. Kessler, Clive S, "Social Science and Knowledge in a Globalising World. Zawawi Ibrahim", pp.23~50 (2012), Malaysian Social Science Association, Strategic Information and Research Development Centre
  36. Keyes, Charles F., "Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America", pp.9~24 (1992), The Association for Asian Studies
  37. King, Victor T., "Between West and East: Policy and Practice in South-East Asian Studies in Britain" (1990), Hull University Press
  38. King, Victor T, "Reflections of a Jobbing Social Scientist Twenty Years On", The Sarawak Gazette, 121, pp.15~19 (1994)
  39. King, Victor T., "Anthropology and Development in South-East Asia:Theory and Practice" (1999), Oxford University Press
  40. King, Victor T, "Southeast Asia: an Anthropological Field of Study?", Moussons. Recherche en Sciences humaines sur l’Asie du Sud-Est, 3, pp.3~31 (2001)
  41. Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies: Personal Reflections on a Region, "King, Victor T", Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, University of Lund, ~, pp.Working Paper no. 13 (2005)
  42. King, Victor T., "Review of ‘Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space'", ASEASUK News, 39, pp.16~19 (2006)
  43. King, Victor T, "Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions", pp.23~44 (2006), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, International Institute of Asian Studies
  44. King, Victor T., "The Sociology of Southeast Asia: Transformations in a Developing Region" (2011), NIAS Press, University of Hawai'i Press
  45. A History of ASEASUK: On its Fortieth Anniversary, "King, Victor T.", School of Oriental and African Studies: Association of South-East Asian Studies in the United Kingdom, ~ (2009)
  46. King, Victor T, "Borneo Studies: Perspectives from a Jobbing Social Scientist", Akademika, 77, pp.15~40 (2009)
  47. King, Victor T., "The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the UK: the Making of a Region", Proceedings of the 2010 SIEAS International Conference of Research Clusters, The Historical Construction of Southeast Asia, pp.131~182 (2010), Sogang Institute of East Asian Studies
  48. King, Victor T, "The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the United Kingdom (and Europe): the Making of a Region" (2011)
  49. King, Victor T., "Review Essay. The Problem with Areas: Asia and Area Studies", Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 168, pp.314~324 (2012)
  50. King, Victor T, "Social Science and Knowledge in a Globalising World", pp.117~164 (2012), Strategic Information and Research Development Centre
  51. King, Victor T., "The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies", pp.265~323 (2013), ISEAS Press
  52. King, Victor T, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.44~63 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  53. King, Victor T, "The Modern Anthropology of South-East Asia" (2006), Routledge
  54. Korff, Ruediger, "Current Ttrends in Anthropological and Sociological Research in Southeast Asia", Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 25, pp.63~72 (2006)
  55. Kratoska, Paul H., "Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space" (2005), Singapore University Press, Ohio University Press
  56. Kratoska, Paul H., "Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space" (2005), Singapore University Press, Ohio University Press
  57. Kuijper, Hans, "Area Studies versus Disciplines. Towards an Interdisciplinary, Systemic Country Approach", The International Journal of interdisciplinary Social Science, 3(7), pp.205~216 (2008)
  58. Lieberman, Victor, "Local Integration and Eurasian Analogies: Structuring Southeast Asian History. c.1350-c.1830", Modern Asian Studies, 27, pp.475~572 (1993)
  59. Lieberman, Victor, "An Age of Commerce in Southeast Asia? Problems of Regional Coherence - A Review Article", The Journal of Asian Studies, 54, pp.796~807 (1995)
  60. Lombard, Denys, "Networks and Synchronisms in Southeast Asian History", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26, pp.10~16 (1995)
  61. McVey, Ruth T, "Change and Continuity in Southeast Asian Studies", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26, pp.1~9 (1995)
  62. McVey, Ruth T, "Southeast Asian Studies: Reorientations", pp.37~64 (1998), Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Publications
  63. McVey, Ruth T., "Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space", pp.308~319 (2005), Singapore University Press, Ohio University Press
  64. Milner, Anthony, "Approaching Asia, and Asian Studies, in Australia", Asian Studies Review, 23, pp.193~203 (1999)
  65. Ooi Keat Gin, "Southeast Asia: a Historical Encyclopedia from Angkor Wat to East Timor, 3 volumes" (2004), ABC-Clio
  66. Park Seung Woo, "The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies. Korea and Beyond" (2013), ISEAS Press
  67. Quinlan, Tim, "Grasping the Changing World:Anthropological Concepts in a Postmodern Era", pp.74~99 (1996), Routledge
  68. Reid, Anthony, "Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce:1400-1680, Vol. 1, The Land Below the Winds; Vol. 2, Expansion and Crisis" (1993), Yale University Press
  69. Reid, Anthony, "Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia", pp.256~276 (1994), Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  70. Reid, Anthony, "A Saucer Model of Southeast Asian Identity", Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Special Focus:Reconceptualizing Southeast Asia, 27, pp.7~23 (1999)
  71. Reid, Anthony, "Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives" (2003), Arizona State University
  72. Reid, Anthony, "Southeast Asian Studies: Decline or Rebirth? Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives", pp.1~23 (2003), Arizona State University
  73. Reynolds, Craig J, "A New Look at Old Southeast Asia", The Journal of Asian Studies, 54, pp.419~446 (1995)
  74. Robinson, Kathryn, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.107~127 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  75. Saw Swee-Hock, "Southeast Asian Studies in China" (2007), ISEAS Publishing
  76. Schäfer, Wolf, "Reconfiguring Area Studies for the Global Age", Globality Studies Journal, Global History, Society, Civilization, (22) (2010)
  77. Schippers, Thomas K, "Fieldwork and Footnotes: Studies in the History of European Anthropology", pp.234~246 (1995), Routledge
  78. Schlehe, Judith, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.253~272 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  79. Sears, Laurie J., "Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects" (2007), University of Washington Press, NUS Press
  80. Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, "Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia", pp.277~296 (1994), Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  81. Simandjuntak, Deasy, "Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies", pp.67~90 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  82. Steedly, Mary, "The State of Culture Theory in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia", Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, pp.431~454 (1999)
  83. Sutherland, Heather, "Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space", pp.20~59 (2005), Singapore University Press, Ohio University Press
  84. Szanton, David L., "The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines", pp.1~33 (2004), University of California Press
  85. Szanton, David L, "The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines" (2004), University of California Press
  86. Teiawa, Teresia K, "Remaking Area Studies;Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific", pp.110~124 (2010), University of Hawai’i Press
  87. Wesley-Smith, Terence, "Remaking Area Studies; Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific" (2010), University of Hawai’i Press
  88. Wolters, O.W., "History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives" (1999), Cornell University

관련 논문AI추천

Approaches to Southeast Asian Studies: Beyond the “Comfort Zone”Mala Rajo Sathian아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2015 · 제7권 제1호Who Made Southeast Asia? Personages, Programs and Problems in the Pursuit of a RegionVictor T. King아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2020 · 제12권 제2호Southeast Asian Studies: Insiders and Outsiders, or is Culture and Identity a Way Forward?Victor T. King아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2016 · 제8권 제1호Other Southeast Asias? Beyond and Within the Association of Southeast Asian NationsVictor T. King아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2018 · 제10권 제2호Southeast Asian Studies and the Reality of Southeast AsiaDavid Henley아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2020 · 제12권 제2호From Southeast Asian Studies to ASEAN Studies: What’s in a Name Change?Rommel A. Curaming아세안연구원 · SUVANNABHUMI2018 · 제10권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Southeast Asian Studies: Area, Method and ComparisonVictor T. Kingpp. 7-11Approaches in Southeast Asian Studies: Developing Post-colonial Theories in Area StudiesCahyo Pamungkaspp. 59-76A Historical Review of Japanese Area Studies and the Emergence of Global StudiesShintaro Fukutakepp. 77-88Approaches to Southeast Asian Studies: Beyond the “Comfort Zone”Mala Rajo Sathianpp. 89-103The Mother Goddess of Champa: Po Inâ NâgarWilliam B Noseworthypp. 107-137
원문 보기