본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

UN and Its Democratization: With a Special Reference to the UN Reforms

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The issue of democratization of international organizations has received attention recently. As globalization has caused global problems, democratic governance and management of international organizations is required. It is especially so in the UN, a core of global governance. There have been constant efforts to reform the UN, but the UN has been criticised in many respects. In this paper, I intend to suggest democracy as the principle for making the UN reforms. To this end, I elaborate on the normative explanation about the necessityand rationale of democratization of the UN. I argue that for the UN, a political space in which to make influential decisions in global level, to be accountable to them and hence to maintain legitimacy, democracy is required. On the other hand, many skeptics claim that professionalism and efficiency should be given priority in decision-making in the UN. Professionalism and efficiency that lack accountability and ignore public good is less likely to contribute to peace and security. Suggesting that the UN seek various ways for making itrepresentative and accountable, I intend to argue that civil society or NGOs may be a catalyst for the UN to be so. The civil society is to be more actively intervened in the UN’s decision-making process and to inspect it. To this end,the UN needs to have the accountability mechanism in which civil society has the initiative and opportunities to examine the UN’s tasks. In this context, it may be expected that in the UN, political participation or decision-making would be no longer the exclusive province of high politics.

Abstract

The issue of democratization of international organizations has received attention recently. As globalization has caused global problems, democratic governance and management ofinternational organizations is required. It is especially so in the UN, a core of global governance. There have been constant efforts to reform the UN, but the UN has been criticised in many respects. In this paper, I intend to suggest democracy as the principle for making the UN reforms. To this end, I elaborate on the normative explanation about the necessity and rationale of democratization of the UN. I argue that for the UN, a political space in which to make influential decisions in global level, to be accountable to them and hence to maintain legitimacy, democracy is required. On the other hand, many skeptics claim that professionalism and efficiency should be given priority in decision-making in the UN. Professionalism and efficiency that lack accountability and ignore public good is less likely to contribute to peace and security. Suggesting that the UN seek various ways for making itrepresentative and accountable, I intend to argue that civil society or NGOs may be a catalyst for the UN to be so. The civil society is to be more actively intervened in the UN’s decision-making process and to inspect it. To this end,the UN needs to have the accountability mechanism in which civil society has the initiative and opportunities to examine the UN’s tasks. In this context, it may be expected that in the UN, political participation or decision-making would be no longer the exclusive province of high politics.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Archibugi, D, "The Reform of the UN and Cosmopolitan Democracy: A Critical Review", Journal of Peace Research, 30(3), pp.301~315 (1993)
  2. Archibugi, D, "The Ethics of Global Governance", pp.51~66 (2009), Lynne Rienner Publisher
  3. Bull, H, "The Anarchical Society" (1977), Macmillan
  4. Clarke, J. N, "Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
  5. Commission on Global Governance, "Our Global Neighbourhood" (1995), Oxford University Press
  6. Dahl, R. A, "The Global Transformations Reader", pp.530~541 (2002), Polity
  7. Diehl, P. F, "The Politics of Global Governance: International Organizations in an Interdependent World" (1997), Lynne Rienner Publishers
  8. 6, "Global Civil Society 2005", pp.2005, Falks, R
  9. Ghebali, Victor-Yves, "A New Charter for a Worldwide Organisation", pp.79~111 (1997), Kluwer Law International
  10. Guilherme Stolle Paixão e Casarões, "Can International Organizations be Democratic? Rethinking Robert Dahl’s Skeptical Argument", Joint International Conference-International Studies Association(ISA) and Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais(ABRI) (2010)
  11. Held, D, "Global Governance and Public Accountability", pp.1~7 (2005), Blackwell
  12. Johnson, S, "The Earth Summit" (1993), Martinus Nijhoff
  13. Karns, M. P, "International Organizations" (2010), Lynne Rienner Publisher
  14. Keohane, R, "Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance", pp.1~35 (2003), Polity
  15. Krasno, J. E, "The United Stations: Confronting the Challenges of a Global Society" (2004), Lynne Rienner Publisher Press
  16. 237, "The United Nations: Its Problems and What to Do About Them. 59 Recommendations Proposed in Response to General Assembly Resolution 40", pp.1986, Lichenstein, C
  17. Luck, E. C, "Reforming the United Nations: Lessons from a History of Progress", The Politics of Global Governance, pp.445~482 (2005)
  18. Mingst, K. A, "The United Nations in the 21st Century" (2007), Westview Press
  19. Műller, J, "Reforming the United Nations: The Struggle for Legitimacy and Effectiveness" (2005), Matinus Nijhoff Publisher
  20. Osiander, A, "The States System of Europe, 1640-1990" (1990), Clarendon Press
  21. Przeworski, A, "Democracy, Accountability, and Representation" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  22. Schechier, M. G, "United Nations Global Conference" (2005), Routledge
  23. Schmitter, P, "What Democracy Is... and What It Is Not", Journal of Democracy, 2, pp.75~88
  24. Trent, J. E, "Modernizing the United Nations System" (2007), Barbara Budrich
  25. Urquhart, B, "Towards A More Effective United Nations" (1992), Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
  26. Wallensteen, P, "Representing the World: A Security Council for the 21st Century", Security Dialogue, 25(1), pp.63~75 (1994)
  27. Kim, Boo-Chan, "The UN Reform: On the Secretary General’s Reform Reports", Law and Policy, 4, pp.103~137 (1998)
  28. Kim, Taekyoon, "The Mechanism of the World Bank’s Accountability", Journal of Korea’s Development Cooperation, 3, pp.17~26 (2012)
  29. 김태균, "글로벌 거버넌스와 개발협력의 책무성: 수용과 남용의 딜레마", 국제정치논총, 53(4), pp.259~295 (2013), 한국국제정치학회
  30. Park, Jaeyoung, "Understanding UN Conferences" (2001), Bupmoon-sa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)