한국간호시뮬레이션학회지 논문심사 평가결과 분석
Analysis of the Submitted Papers’ Evaluations for the Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the reviewers’ evaluations of papers submitted to the Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing between 2019 and June 2024. Methods: We analyzed 117 quantitative (69 published and 48 unpublished) and 16 qualitative (11 published and five unpublished) studies. The reviewers’ checklist-based evaluations were analyzed using means and standard deviations. The scope method was used to examine the reviewers’ subjective evaluations. Results: For quantitative studies, the highest average score among published papers was in the “Research Theme” category (3.64±0.73). Contrastingly, the lowest average scores were in the “Discussion” category, with 3.32±0.74 for quantitative studies and 3.23±0.74 for qualitative studies. In rejected papers, the “Discussion” category recorded the lowest scores, at 2.35±0.74 for quantitative studies and 1.92±0.76 for qualitative studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrated the research characteristics of this journal and focus of the review by providing information on the reviewers’ evaluations. Structured scientific research based on these results will contribute to improving the academic quality of journals by reinforcing the openness and systematicity of academic communication.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the reviewers’ evaluations of papers submitted to the Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing between 2019 and June 2024. Methods: We analyzed 117 quantitative (69 published and 48 unpublished) and 16 qualitative (11 published and five unpublished) studies. The reviewers’ checklist-based evaluations were analyzed using means and standard deviations. The scope method was used to examine the reviewers’ subjective evaluations. Results: For quantitative studies, the highest average score among published papers was in the “Research Theme” category (3.64±0.73). Contrastingly, the lowest average scores were in the “Discussion” category, with 3.32±0.74 for quantitative studies and 3.23±0.74 for qualitative studies. In rejected papers, the “Discussion” category recorded the lowest scores, at 2.35±0.74 for quantitative studies and 1.92±0.76 for qualitative studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrated the research characteristics of this journal and focus of the review by providing information on the reviewers’ evaluations. Structured scientific research based on these results will contribute to improving the academic quality of journals by reinforcing the openness and systematicity of academic communication.
참고문헌 (24)
- Arksey, H., "Scoping studies : Towards a methodological framework", International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), pp.19~32 (2005)[DOI]
- Arrom, L. M., "How to write an original article", Actas Urológicas Españolas(English Edition), 42(9), pp.545~550 (2018)[DOI]
- Cho, K. S., "Analysis of review contents of the submitted papers in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing : Focus the submitted papers in 2003", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36(1), pp.197~205 (2006)[DOI]
- "Journal citations reports JCR"[URL]
- Day, R. A., "How to write and publish a scientific paper" (2024), Cambridge University Press
- Diggle, P. J., "Statistics and scientific method: An introduction for students and researchers" (2011), Oxford University Press
- "How to conduct a review" (2024)[URL]
- Griffiths, P., "Why was my paper rejected? Editors’ reflections on common issues which influence decisions to reject papers submitted for publication in academic nursing journals", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 100(57), pp.A1~A4 (2016)[DOI]
- Heo, N., "Scoping studies analysis of the Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing", Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing, 10(1), pp.1~16 (2022)[DOI]
- Kang, H., "A review on the use of effect size in nursing research", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 45(5), pp.641~649 (2015)[DOI]
- "Academics, education, activities" (2024)[URL]
- Lee, J., "An integrated literature review of problem-based learning based on simulation education program for nursing", Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), pp.15~41 (2023)[DOI]
- Lee, S. H., "Trend analysis of research in the Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing over a 6-year period(2013-2018)", Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing, 7(2), pp.1~9 (2019)[DOI]
- "Innovative and challenging R&D development system systemization plan" (2024)[URL]
- Mubazi, J. K., "Quality criteria of a research output", American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 3(3), pp.255~266 (2019)[DOI]
- Mulyadi, M., "Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students' learning outcomes : A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies", Nurse Education Today, 107, pp.105127~ (2021)[DOI]
- "NRF webzine" (2024)[URL]
- Park, W. W., "A proposal on determining appropriate sample size considering statistical conclusion validity", Seoul Journal of Industrial Relations, 21, pp.51~85 (2010)
- Sharifi, C., "Selecting a journal for your manuscript : A 4-step process", Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(1), pp.85~91 (2020)[DOI]
- Taherdoost, H., "How to write an effective discussion in a research paper : A guide to writing the discussion section of a research article", Open Access Journal of Addiction and Psychology, 5(2), pp.1~3 (2022)[DOI]
- Vortman, R., "Sharing perioperative nursing expertise through publication : A guide for the novice author", AORN Journal, 119(3), pp.186~196 (2024)[DOI]