A Study on KOREA-CHINA Fishing Dispute and Marine SECURITY Strengthening Plan
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the Korean waters, illegal fishing activities by Chinese fishing vessels are increasing rapidly and becoming violent. For example, due to the severe resistance to the recent crackdown, Korean Coast Guard was settled down and the high-speed boat was sunk. Marine security issues such as marine environment and maintenance of ocean order are becoming a national problem. In this regard, Korean Coast Guard revised its manual on use of weapons and shifted its position toward stronger response. However, it is necessary to prevent the controversy of international disputes by explicitly stipulating its role and authority in the relevant laws and regulations. Korean Coast Guard have cracked illegal fishing vessels in China and processed them according to domestic legal process. Since these disputes are international in character, they cannot be expected to be actively responded to because they can become diplomatic problems. This study examined the actual situation of illegal fishing in China and domestic and overseas laws, and suggests the enhancement of responsiveness and social interest of the seaside through the improvement of the legal system. South Korea and China have promised to cooperate in order to maintain fishing order and protect fishery resources in the West Sea in 2014. In the "2015 Working Group Meeting on Penetration of Fisheries in Korea and China", it was decided to strengthen the cooperative control of the two countries on unauthorized Chinese fishing vessels with the common awareness that strong crackdown and punishment are necessary for the eradication of illegal fishing. Disputes over maritime sovereignty in Korea and China, as well as globally, are at stake. In each country, fisheries resources and energy security are emerging as important issues for national security as well as for economic development. Therefore, a national maritime sovereignty protection strategy is needed to effectively secure the maritime security of the Republic of Korea. First, it is necessary to strengthen responsiveness through the maintenance of related laws and efforts to reduce disputes under international law. Second, it is required to enhance the conservation of fishery resources and raise social interest to maintain good fishing relations. In addition, it is necessary to build an efficient marine management system between government ministries and strengthen multi-dimensional maritime security cooperation with neighboring countries.
Abstract
In the Korean waters, illegal fishing activities by Chinese fishing vessels are increasing rapidly and becoming violent. For example, due to the severe resistance to the recent crackdown, Korean Coast Guard was settled down and the high-speed boat was sunk. Marine security issues such as marine environment and maintenance of ocean order are becoming a national problem. In this regard, Korean Coast Guard revised its manual on use of weapons and shifted its position toward stronger response. However, it is necessary to prevent the controversy of international disputes by explicitly stipulating its role and authority in the relevant laws and regulations. Korean Coast Guard have cracked illegal fishing vessels in China and processed them according to domestic legal process. Since these disputes are international in character, they cannot be expected to be actively responded to because they can become diplomatic problems. This study examined the actual situation of illegal fishing in China and domestic and overseas laws, and suggests the enhancement of responsiveness and social interest of the seaside through the improvement of the legal system. South Korea and China have promised to cooperate in order to maintain fishing order and protect fishery resources in the West Sea in 2014. In the "2015 Working Group Meeting on Penetration of Fisheries in Korea and China", it was decided to strengthen the cooperative control of the two countries on unauthorized Chinese fishing vessels with the common awareness that strong crackdown and punishment are necessary for the eradication of illegal fishing. Disputes over maritime sovereignty in Korea and China, as well as globally, are at stake. In each country, fisheries resources and energy security are emerging as important issues for national security as well as for economic development. Therefore, a national maritime sovereignty protection strategy is needed to effectively secure the maritime security of the Republic of Korea. First, it is necessary to strengthen responsiveness through the maintenance of related laws and efforts to reduce disputes under international law. Second, it is required to enhance the conservation of fishery resources and raise social interest to maintain good fishing relations. In addition, it is necessary to build an efficient marine management system between government ministries and strengthen multi-dimensional maritime security cooperation with neighboring countries.
참고문헌 (13)
- 정봉규, "불법어업에 대한 해상집행기관의 역할 및 방향 - 중국어선의 불법어업을 중심으로 -", 수산해양교육연구, 26(4), pp.769~788 (2014), 한국수산해양교육학회
- 노호래, "불법조업 중국어선에 대한 해양경찰의 대응방안", 한국경찰연구, 9(2), pp.29~58 (2010), 한국경찰연구학회
- 노호래, "서해 5도에서의 중국어선의 불법조업 문제", 한국해양경찰학회보, 5(1), pp.59~80 (2015), 한국해양경찰학회
- Shin SC, "A study on the Countermesures against Illegal Fishing by Chinese Boats", Maritime Law Review, 25(3), pp.215~248 (2013)
- 김종선, "중국어선 범죄행위 대응 경찰장비 사용에 대한 재검토", 한국해양경찰학회보, 2(1), pp.3~35 (2012), 한국해양경찰학회
- 임채현, "불법조업 중국어선에 대한 해양경찰의 단속에 관한 고찰", 해양환경안전학회지, 20(1), pp.49~58 (2014), 해양환경안전학회[DOI]
- White Paper, "Korean Coast Guard", ~ (2014)
- 詹德斌, "海洋權益角力下的中韓漁業糾紛分析", 東北亞論壇, 10, pp.63~64 (2013)
- Lee KS, "Problems with and Effective Countermeasures for South Korea’s Crackdown on the Illegal Chinese Fishing Boats", Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice Review, 64, pp.167~190 (2016)
- 曲維濤, "中韓漁業協定執行情況及有關問題硏究分析", 漁業信息與戰略, 3, pp.175~179 (2015)
- 農業部辦公廳 關於 2016 年實施中韓漁業協定有關問題 的通知, "中華人民共和國農業部", 中華人民共和國農業部漁業局, ~ (2016)
- 최관, "국가안보 및 국민안전 확보를 위한 해양공권력 강화방안 - 중국어선의 불법어업을 중심으로 -", 치안정책연구, 30(1), pp.269~302 (2016), 치안정책연구소[DOI]
