본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

Policy Reference for Improving Community SAFETY: Factors That Determine the Citizen Satisfaction with Police Service in KOREA and the U.S

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

Police service include police protection for all citizens, including law enforcement and crime prevention. This service is distinct from other public services because it enforces governmental rule regardless of citizen agreement, and it is provided exclusively in special fields like crime investigation, construction, protection, etc. As the government came to assume more responsibilities from citizens, assessment of police performance grew in importance. Perhaps the most effective way of evaluating performance is to focus on the degree of citizens' satisfaction. Various preliminary studies have found citizen satisfaction with police service is an important factor to consider for many reasons. First, citizen satisfaction offers information and knowledge required for the police to make decisions. Second, it allows the police to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their own departments. Third, release of citizen evaluation promotes the sense of responsibility and accountability of the police. Fourth, the evaluations make up the limit of objective performance indices like crime rate, arrest rate, etc. This study analyzed the factors that contribute to citizen satisfaction with police service in KOREA and in the U.S. To that end, NDSI model was used instead of SERVQUAL model, which is frequently used in public service fields. NDSI model is different from the existing model in that it stresses the importance of public services delivered, including location, facility, time, and method. This study included 346 Koreans and 282 Americans. In KOREA, survey questionnaires were collected from citizens who have lived in Daejeon (Korea’s fifth largest city, population 1.5 million) from January through June, 2016. In the United States (U.S.), residents of Cincinnati, OH were surveyed from June through October, 2016. The surveys here included online students as well. The survey revealed that the two most important factors in both countries affecting citizen satisfaction with police service involve police facilities and processing capacity. KOREA was lower than the U.S. in the citizen satisfaction with police facility. It was found that high evaluation of police facility and work processing capacity the common actors in KOREA and in the U.S. affected higher satisfaction of citizens. In KOREA police facility was shown to affect citizens satisfaction more than work processing capacity. Meanwhile in the U.S., work processing capacity was more influential. The remaining factors, police service development and services (KOREA) and police policy (U.S.) also displayed positive effects on citizen satisfaction.

Abstract

Police service include police protection for all citizens, including law enforcement and crime prevention. This service is distinct from other public services because it enforces governmental rule regardless of citizen agreement, and it is provided exclusively in special fields like crime investigation, construction, protection, etc. As the government came to assume more responsibilities from citizens, assessment of police performance grew in importance. Perhaps the most effective way of evaluating performance is to focus on the degree of citizens' satisfaction. Various preliminary studies have found citizen satisfaction with police service is an important factor to consider for many reasons. First, citizen satisfaction offers information and knowledge required for the police to make decisions. Second, it allows the police to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their own departments. Third, release of citizen evaluation promotes the sense of responsibility and accountability of the police. Fourth, the evaluations make up the limit of objective performance indices like crime rate, arrest rate, etc. This study analyzed the factors that contribute to citizen satisfaction with police service in KOREA and in the U.S. To that end, NDSI model was used instead of SERVQUAL model, which is frequently used in public service fields. NDSI model is different from the existing model in that it stresses the importance of public services delivered, including location, facility, time, and method. This study included 346 Koreans and 282 Americans. In KOREA, survey questionnaires were collected from citizens who have lived in Daejeon (Korea’s fifth largest city, population 1.5 million) from January through June, 2016. In the United States (U.S.), residents of Cincinnati, OH were surveyed from June through October, 2016. The surveys here included online students as well. The survey revealed that the two most important factors in both countries affecting citizen satisfaction with police service involve police facilities and processing capacity. KOREA was lower than the U.S. in the citizen satisfaction with police facility. It was found that high evaluation of police facility and work processing capacity the common actors in KOREA and in the U.S. affected higher satisfaction of citizens. In KOREA police facility was shown to affect citizens satisfaction more than work processing capacity. Meanwhile in the U.S., work processing capacity was more influential. The remaining factors, police service development and services (KOREA) and police policy (U.S.) also displayed positive effects on citizen satisfaction.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Howieson B, "Public and Third Sector Leadership: Experience Speaks" (2014), Emerald
  2. Swindell D, "Linking Citizen Satisfaction Data to Performance Measures: A Preliminary Evaluation", Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), pp.30~52 (2000)
  3. Oliver RL, "A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions", Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), pp.460~469 (1980)
  4. Huseman RC, "A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct", Academy of Management Review, 12(2), pp.222~234 (1987)
  5. LaTour SA, "Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research", Advances in Consumer Research, 6, pp.431~437 (1979)
  6. Wholey JS, "The Case for Performance Monitoring", Public Administration Review, 52(6), pp.604~610 (1992)
  7. Behn RD, "Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures", Public Administration Review, 63(5), pp.586~606 (2003)
  8. Lee JH, "A Study on Policy Effect by the Introduction of Patrol Division System", Master's, pp.2008
  9. Larsen JE, "The Importance of Police Performance as a Determinant of Satisfaction with Police", American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(1), pp.1~10 (2009)
  10. Brown B, "Perceptions of the Police: Past Findings Methodological Issues Conceptual Issues and Policy Implications", Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(3), pp.543~580 (2002)
  11. Worrall JL, "Public Perceptions of Police Efficacy and Image: The Fuzziness of Support for the Police", American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), pp.47~66 (1999)
  12. Scaglion R, "Determinants of Attitudes toward City Police", Criminology, 17(4), pp.485~494 (1980)
  13. Cheurprakobkit S, "Police-citizen Contact and Police Performance Attitudinal Differences between Hispanics and Non-hispanics", Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(4), pp.325~336 (2000)
  14. Brown K, "Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery", Public Administration Review, 43(1), pp.50~58 (1983)
  15. Mastrofski D, "Ideas in American Policing Series" (1999)
  16. Mudie P, "Services Marketing Management" (2012), Routledge
  17. Lee JP, "Newly Developed Quality Evaluation Model on Public Service", Journal of the Korean Association for Public Management, 23(1), pp.1~32 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)