Reforming Tool to Measure MEDICAL ETHICS CONSCIOUSNESS of Korean Young Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study complements some of the limitations of the past developed tool for measuring medical ethics consciousness of Korean young students. Method: This study was based on the past tool which was developed according to G. Lind of Germany. The validity process followed the verification procedure of Moral Competence Test (MCT) proposed by G. Lind. To get much higher validation, this study got advices from 3 specialist in the sphere of moral education. Results: This study adopted the result of the past medical ethics consciousness measurement tool. Its whole validation did cover three major processes, preference hierarchy by moral development, affective-cognitive paral-lelism test, quasi-simplex structure of inter-correlations between the six moral orientations test by L. Kohlberg. This past tool showed weakness in the point of preference hierarchy test. Especially the tool got some strange situation at 1st stage and 4th stage. To back up this weakness, we made a decision to receive specialists’ advices. So we interviewed 3 people who is professor or research fellow in the sphere of moral education. We could arrived at more advanced level for medical ethics consciousness. Conclusion: This study showed the more advanced medical ethics consciousness tool. Next time it is necessary to generalized through deep research using much broader topics in the medical ethics.
Abstract
Purpose: This study complements some of the limitations of the past developed tool for measuring medical ethics consciousness of Korean young students. Method: This study was based on the past tool which was developed according to G. Lind of Germany. The validity process followed the verification procedure of Moral Competence Test (MCT) proposed by G. Lind. To get much higher validation, this study got advices from 3 specialist in the sphere of moral education. Results: This study adopted the result of the past medical ethics consciousness measurement tool. Its whole validation did cover three major processes, preference hierarchy by moral development, affective-cognitive paral-lelism test, quasi-simplex structure of inter-correlations between the six moral orientations test by L. Kohlberg. This past tool showed weakness in the point of preference hierarchy test. Especially the tool got some strange situation at 1st stage and 4th stage. To back up this weakness, we made a decision to receive specialists’ advices. So we interviewed 3 people who is professor or research fellow in the sphere of moral education. We could arrived at more advanced level for medical ethics consciousness. Conclusion: This study showed the more advanced medical ethics consciousness tool. Next time it is necessary to generalized through deep research using much broader topics in the medical ethics.
참고문헌 (17)
- Jiyoung Lee, "Application and Satisfaction Study of Medua-Based TEACHING & LEARNING Method in Beauty Education: Focusing on Flipped Learning using Google Classroom", Public Value, 6(1), pp.92~105 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Mira Heo, "A Study on the Artistic Value of DUNHUANG Patterns", Public Value, 6(1), pp.51~61 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Soyoung Lee, "A Study on the Professionalism of Cabin Crew Applying the PROFESSIONALISM Perspective", Public Value, 6(1), pp.72~82 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Xuemei Zhao, "The Aspects of Ecological ENVIRONMENT in Host City of the Winter Olympic Games", Public Value, 6(1), pp.83~91 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Yang Luo, "Directions for the Korean Social INTEGRATION Policy Index Development", Public Value, 6(1), pp.62~71 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Andrew DL, "What is Medical Ethics?", Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 1, pp.3~6 (2011)
- Beauchamp TL, "Principles of Biomedical Ethics" (2019), Oxford University
- Borysowski J, "Ethics Codes and Medical Decision Making", Patient Education and Counseling, 104, pp.1312~1316 (2021)
- Frischhut M, "A European Perspective on Medical Ethics", Healthcare Ethics and Communication, 48(10), pp.634~636 (2020)
- 박균열, "청소년용 의료윤리의식 측정도구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(22), pp.701~722 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- Lind G, "How Does One Measure Moral Judgment? Problems and Alternative Ways of Measuring a Complex Construct[German: Wie Mißt Man Moralisches Urteil? Probleme und Alternative Möglichkeiten der Messung Eines Komplexen Konstrukts)" (1978), Beltz
- Lind G, "Experimental Questionnaires: A New Approach to Personality Research" (1982), North-Holland
- Lind G, "Growth and Regression in Moral-cognitive Development" (1985), Precedent
- Lind G, "The Theory of Moral-cognitive Judgment: A Socio-psychological Assessment" (1985), Precedents
- Lind G, "Ist Moral Lehrbar? Ergebnisse der Modernen Moralpsychologischen Forschung" (2002), LogosVerlag
- Lind G, "Moral ist Lehrbar: Handbuch zur Theorie und Praxis Moralischer und Demokratischer Bildung" (2003), Oldenbourg-verlag
- Lind G, "How to Teach Morality" (2016), Logos