본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Study on the Role of the Minor OFFENSE Screening Committee in Republic of KOREA

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

Recently the Korean police organization has faced the domestic and international changes; the rapid social changes and increasing desires of various civil human rights. So social asks for the quality-improvement of the procedure of investigation have been increasing and various ways for satisfying their needs have been focused. In connection with this situation, the academic world has been interested in the minor offense screening committee to guarantee appropriateness of investigation. The police invited citizens and formed the minor offense screening committee that decides which offender should go to summary trial or be dismissed on warning. Korea minor offence screening committee is the system to preserve civil right through rapid procedures. Therefore the purpose of this study is to analyze present condition and problem of minor offense screening committee. Consequently this study will offer effective ways to guarantee human right. Firstof allthe minor offense screening committee shall screen the following matters: Larceny, Embezzlements of Lost Articles, Fraud(free riding, eating without paying a bill), Crime of Violence, Object of Summary Judgments in a criminal offence and so forth. And Subject for Screening shall be following persons; the person who has no criminal history recode, the person who needs social the person who has no summary judgments recode within the limit of one year and economical protection in the reason of disabled person and basic living security received people and so on. And the committee shall be comprised of at least seven but not more than nine members, including the chairperson. Consultants are chosen three to five people who have much knowledge and experience in and take respect from community. The terms of office for the consultant shall each be three years and they may be reappointed or recommissioned only once. The chiefs of police stations may dismiss any consultant of the Committee who falls under politicians who are elected, party member and the persons who are concerned in policing. Also committee can make a decision on the minor crime by the summery judgements or initial disposition maintenance and on the summery judgements by the dismissal with a caution or initial disposition maintenance. The chief of committee makes a decision by over two thirds of attendant members including the chief and members recode the opinions on the report of the minor offence screening committee. Also the chief of the police station can take a support action to prevent the repeated crime of the subject of screening: the connection to the welfare department of the local government. On the basis of above study result, this study suggested some necessary ideas on managing and administrating the minor offense screening committee effectively in the future. Concretely, this study proposed exclusion, recusal and refrainment of minor offence screening committeemembers. Also this study suggested Procedure for raising an appeal and mediation.

Abstract

Recently the Korean police organization has faced the domestic and international changes; the rapid social changes and increasing desires of various civil human rights. So social asks for the quality-improvement of the procedure of investigation have been increasing and various ways for satisfying their needs have been focused. In connection with this situation, the academic world has been interested in the minor offense screening committee to guarantee appropriateness of investigation. The police invited citizens and formed the minor offense screening committee that decides which offender should go to summary trial or be dismissed on warning. Korea minor offence screening committee is the system to preserve civil right through rapid procedures. Therefore the purpose of this study is to analyze present condition and problem of minor offense screening committee. Consequently this study will offer effective ways to guarantee human right. Firstof allthe minor offense screening committee shall screen the following matters: Larceny, Embezzlements of Lost Articles, Fraud(free riding, eating without paying a bill), Crime of Violence, Object of Summary Judgments in a criminal offence and so forth. And Subject for Screening shall be following persons; the person who has no criminal history recode, the person who needs social the person who has no summary judgments recode within the limit of one year and economical protection in the reason of disabled person and basic living security received people and so on. And the committee shall be comprised of at least seven but not more than nine members, including the chairperson. Consultants are chosen three to five people who have much knowledge and experience in and take respect from community. The terms of office for the consultant shall each be three years and they may be reappointed or recommissioned only once. The chiefs of police stations may dismiss any consultant of the Committee who falls under politicians who are elected, party member and the persons who are concerned in policing. Also committee can make a decision on the minor crime by the summery judgements or initial disposition maintenance and on the summery judgements by the dismissal with a caution or initial disposition maintenance. The chief of committee makes a decision by over two thirds of attendant members including the chief and members recode the opinions on the report of the minor offence screening committee. Also the chief of the police station can take a support action to prevent the repeated crime of the subject of screening: the connection to the welfare department of the local government. On the basis of above study result, this study suggested some necessary ideas on managing and administrating the minor offense screening committee effectively in the future. Concretely, this study proposed exclusion, recusal and refrainment of minor offence screening committeemembers. Also this study suggested Procedure for raising an appeal and mediation.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 남재성, "경찰공무원의 인권의식 강화를 위한 경찰 인권교육의 개선방안", 한국경찰연구, 13(2), pp.55~78 (2014), 한국경찰연구학회
  2. 표창원, "한국과 영국의 경찰수사 절차상 인권보호 장치에 대한 비교 연구", 한국경찰연구, 6(3), pp.59~90 (2007), 한국경찰연구학회
  3. 박경래, "인권과 경찰활동: 조직 및 환경적 영향요인을 중심으로", 한국경찰연구, 7(4), pp.123~162 (2008), 한국경찰연구학회
  4. 김상운, "수사 경찰의 인권보호 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국치안행정논집, 8(4), pp.151~167 (2012), 한국치안행정학회[DOI]
  5. 조현빈, "경찰수사과정의 인권보호에 관한 연구", 한국공안행정학회보, (21), pp.37~68 (2005), 한국공안행정학회
  6. 2016 Minor Of-fence ScreeningCommittee Operating Plan, "The National Police Agency", ~ (2016)
  7. 박동수, "경찰 수사지휘권의 근거와 그 행사에 관한 연구", 한국경찰연구, 12(4), pp.119~148 (2013), 한국경찰연구학회
  8. Kim HB, "A Study on Role of Minor Offence Screening Committee for Guaranteeing Civil Human Right", Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice Winter Season Seminar (2017)
  9. 이동원, "형사조정프로그램의 이상적인 모델구성과 적용방안", 한국공안행정학회보, 19(1), pp.139~169 (2010), 한국공안행정학회
  10. 양경규, "형사상 화해·조정제도에 관한 연구", 한국경찰연구, 7(4), pp.185~215 (2008), 한국경찰연구학회
  11. 이무선, "경찰단계에서의 형사조정제도도입의 필요성에 대한 연구", 한국공안행정학회보, 24(2), pp.147~177 (2015), 한국공안행정학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)