The Present Status and Development Plan of Citizen Participation: Focused on the Autonomous Police System
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to examine the current status of citizen participation in the self-governing police system, which has been implemented since July 1, 2021, focusing on metropolitan municipalities in Korea, and to suggest improvement plans for revitalization. Method: The research method was based on the website of local government, government statistics data, and academic papers. Results: The current citizen participation in the self-governing police system is limited to formal participation because there is a lack of system and support to be a citizen participation. Conclusion: As an improvement plan, first, it is necessary to open a unique homepage and strengthen the publicity in order to actively encourage citizens' participation. In other words, it is necessary to actively promote and provide institutional support so that local citizens can actively know and participate in the main policies of the autonomous police committee. Second, active interactive communication plans should be sought to promote citizen participation (regular meetings, holding briefing sessions, etc.). Third, it is necessary to seek cooperation in the level of co-production in the security services. Fourth, it is the enactment of ordinances by local governments that can activate citizen participation. Fifth, the activation of citizen participation through the network construction of police cooperation organizations and civic groups related to security services should be promoted. For the success-ful settlement of the self-governing police system, citizen participation should be activated so that it can be a police activity that meets the needs of residents and the residents who are the purpose of the self-governing police system.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the current status of citizen participation in the self-governing police system, which has been implemented since July 1, 2021, focusing on metropolitan municipalities in Korea, and to suggest improvement plans for revitalization. Method: The research method was based on the website of local government, government statistics data, and academic papers. Results: The current citizen participation in the self-governing police system is limited to formal participation because there is a lack of system and support to be a citizen participation. Conclusion: As an improvement plan, first, it is necessary to open a unique homepage and strengthen the publicity in order to actively encourage citizens' participation. In other words, it is necessary to actively promote and provide institutional support so that local citizens can actively know and participate in the main policies of the autonomous police committee. Second, active interactive communication plans should be sought to promote citizen participation (regular meetings, holding briefing sessions, etc.). Third, it is necessary to seek cooperation in the level of co-production in the security services. Fourth, it is the enactment of ordinances by local governments that can activate citizen participation. Fifth, the activation of citizen participation through the network construction of police cooperation organizations and civic groups related to security services should be promoted. For the success-ful settlement of the self-governing police system, citizen participation should be activated so that it can be a police activity that meets the needs of residents and the residents who are the purpose of the self-governing police system.
참고문헌 (31)
- 이현우, "자치경찰제 도입에 관한 비교연구", 한국정책연구, 10(2), pp.247~272 (2010), 경인행정학회
- Park EJ, "Direction of Desirable Korea Model Local & Municipal Police System", Korea Municipal Police Studies Review, 1(1), pp.80~83 (2008)
- 배미란, "현행 자치경찰제의 한계와 과제 - 주로 시민 참여를 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 34(2), pp.123~153 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 황문규, "문재인 정부 자치경찰제 도입방안의 의의와 과제", 경찰법연구, 17(1), pp.95~120 (2019), 한국경찰법학회[DOI]
- Erickson B, "How an Apolitical Association Politicizes", Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 27(2), pp.206~219 (1990)
- 유재원, "시민참여의 확대방안", 한국정책과학학회보, 7(2), pp.105~125 (2003), 한국정책과학학회
- Rosenstone SJ, "Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America" (2003), Longman
- Hyeshim Jung, "The Implications of Police Gender Incusive LEADERSHIP", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 5(2), pp.10~20 (2020), J-INSTITUTE[DOI]
- Verba S, "Participation in America" (1972), Harper and Row
- Mibrath LW, "Political Participation: How and Why do People Get Involved in Politics?" (1977), Rand McNally College
- Barnes SH, "Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies" (1979), Sage
- Booth JH, "Political Participation in Latin America" (1978), Holmes and Meier
- Cunningham JV, "Citizen Participation in Public Affairs", Public Administration Review, 32, pp.589~602 (1972)
- Park Young-soo, "The Study on Initializing KOREAN Local POLICE System for Effective Criminal Responding", Regulations, 4(1), pp.15~22 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Webler T, "Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning : Views on Process from People in the Field", Human Ecology Review, 8(2), pp.29~39 (2001)
- Han Jin-tea, "The Effects of Organizational Justice on Organizational Citizenship Behavior of the KOREAN Police Officers: Mediating Effect of Supervisor Trust INVESTIGATION", Protection Convergence, 4(2), pp.13~25 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- 남재성, "Measures to Revitalize Resident Participation in the Self-Governing Police SYSTEM", Regulations, 6(3), pp.29~38 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim S, "E-participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government", Public Administration Review, 72(6), pp.819~828 (2012)
- Bacard A, "Electronic Democracy : Can We Retake Our Government", Humanist, 53(4), pp.42~43 (1993)
- 김현성, "온라인 시민참여와 전자민주주의의 관계에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 대응성과 협업의 비교를 중심으로 -", 사회과학연구, 22(1), pp.91~120 (2006), 사회과학연구소
- Sanford C, "Characterizing E-participation", International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), pp.406~421 (2007)
- Arnstein SA, "Ladder of Citizen Participation", Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp.216~224 (1969)
- 전영평, "한국의 지방자치와 주민참여:대구지역의 참여 실태를 중심으로", 행정논총, 41(2), pp.53~83 (2003), 한국행정연구소
- 이재용, "행정서비스 공동생산 개념정립 및 유형화에 관한 탐색적 연구: 지방자치단체 사례를 중심으로", 국가정책연구, 34(1), pp.47~74 (2020), 국가정책연구소[DOI]
- Kim JH, "Citizen Coproduction in Solid Waste Management System in Seoul, Korea", Korean Association of Governmental Studies, 27(4), pp.1159~1184 (1993)
- Hoyeun Youn, "NATIONAL SECURITY: Differences in Leaders' Followership in the Korean Security Police Organization according to the Number of Police Officers and Work Location", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(2), pp.27~39 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Yeum MG, "Co-production and Residents' Administrative Consciousness : Focusing on the Security Activities of the Local Government of the United States", Korean Association of Governmental Studies, 29(3), pp.661~679 (1998)
- Sharp EB, "Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation : The Coproduction Concept", Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14(2), pp.105~118 (1980)
- Rich RC, "Interaction of the Voluntary and Governmental Sectors : Toward an Understanding of the Coproduction of Municipal Services", Administration & Society, 13(1), pp.59~76 (1981)
- Jung YS, "Co-production and Policy Direction of Security Service", Korean Policy Studies Review, 3(1), pp.85~106 (1994)
- 김원중, "주민참여가 제한된 자치경찰제의 문제점과 개선방안", 지방자치법연구, 21(3), pp.325~353 (2021), 한국지방자치법학회[DOI]