본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아리스토파네스의 희극과 사회비판 - ‘우스운 것’의 기능을 중심으로 -

Aristophanes’ Comedy and His Critique of Society - A Study of the Concept of the ‘Ridiculous’(geloion) in Aristophanes’s Liberature -

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

It has been considered from the standpoint of the whole that the concept of the ‘ridiculous’(geloion) in the comedies written by Aristophanes has been closely linked to the function of social criticism. It is my thesis that Aristophanes’ critique of Utopia in Ekkles. can be diagnosed not just as expressions of despair and hopelessness but also, more positively, as ones of liberation and relieve which constitutes a different style in the performance of his comedy. It would be the common denominator in Aristophanes’s thought on Utopia, in which the function of the notion of geloion is to free from their authoritarian oppression by the audiences. This liberation has its unique function, first to liberate from the prevailing condition of oppression which was apparent in his early works, and secondly to liberate from the excessive demands by ideological speculation and utopian thinking in his later works such as Ekkles. and Plutos. It is my conclusion that Aristophanes’ treatment of Utopia can be regarded as a means of liberation in the case of its success and as the subject matter of liberation through social criticism It has been considered from the standpoint of the whole that the concept of the ‘ridiculous’(geloion) in the comedies written by Aristophanes has been closely linked to the function of social criticism. It is my thesis that Aristophanes’ critique of Utopia in Ekkles. can be diagnosed not just as expressions of despair and hopelessness but also, more positively, as ones of liberation and relieve which constitutes a different style in the performance of his comedy. It would be the common denominator in Aristophanes’s thought on Utopia, in which the function of the notion of geloion is to free from their authoritarian oppression by the audiences. This liberation has its unique function, first to liberate from the prevailing condition of oppression which was apparent in his early works, and secondly to liberate from the excessive demands by ideological speculation and utopian thinking in his later works such as Ekkles. and Plutos. It is my conclusion that Aristophanes’ treatment of Utopia can be regarded as a means of liberation in the case of its success and as the subject matter of liberation through social criticism

Abstract

It has been considered from the standpoint of the whole that the concept of the ‘ridiculous’(geloion) in the comedies written by Aristophanes has been closely linked to the function of social criticism. It is my thesis that Aristophanes’ critique of Utopia in Ekkles. can be diagnosed not just as expressions of despair and hopelessness but also, more positively, as ones of liberation and relieve which constitutes a different style in the performance of his comedy. It would be the common denominator in Aristophanes’s thought on Utopia, in which the function of the notion of geloion is to free from their authoritarian oppression by the audiences. This liberation has its unique function, first to liberate from the prevailing condition of oppression which was apparent in his early works, and secondly to liberate from the excessive demands by ideological speculation and utopian thinking in his later works such as Ekkles. and Plutos. It is my conclusion that Aristophanes’ treatment of Utopia can be regarded as a means of liberation in the case of its success and as the subject matter of liberation through social criticism It has been considered from the standpoint of the whole that the concept of the ‘ridiculous’(geloion) in the comedies written by Aristophanes has been closely linked to the function of social criticism. It is my thesis that Aristophanes’ critique of Utopia in Ekkles. can be diagnosed not just as expressions of despair and hopelessness but also, more positively, as ones of liberation and relieve which constitutes a different style in the performance of his comedy. It would be the common denominator in Aristophanes’s thought on Utopia, in which the function of the notion of geloion is to free from their authoritarian oppression by the audiences. This liberation has its unique function, first to liberate from the prevailing condition of oppression which was apparent in his early works, and secondly to liberate from the excessive demands by ideological speculation and utopian thinking in his later works such as Ekkles. and Plutos. It is my conclusion that Aristophanes’ treatment of Utopia can be regarded as a means of liberation in the case of its success and as the subject matter of liberation through social criticism

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 아리스토파네스, "희극 전집 2" (2010), 도서출판 숲
  2. Hall, F. W., "Aristophanis comoediae. 2 Bde" (1900), Oxford(OCT)
  3. Ussher, R. G., "Aristophanes. Ecclesiazusae. Ed. with introd. and comm" (1973), Oxford
  4. 류종영, "고대 그리스와 로마 시대의 웃음이론", 독일어문학, 11(4), pp.113~137 (2003), 한국독일어문학회
  5. 임성철, "아리스토파네스의 Ekklesiazousai에 나타난 Praxagora의 이상주의적 구상이 내포한 유토피아와 유토피아 비판에 대한 小考", 철학논총, 2(32), pp.481~496 (2003), 새한철학회
  6. Bloch, E., "Das Prinzip der Hoffnung. I" (1959), Frankfurt a. M
  7. Dalfen, J, "Ein Kapitel politischer Psychologie bei Aristophanes. Festschrift für Franz Egermann zu seinem 80. Geburtstag. Hrsg. von Werner Suerbaum und Friedrich Maier unter Mitarbeit von Gabriele Thome. München", pp.67~80 (1985)
  8. Dönt, E., "Aristophanes. Komödie als Distanz und Identifikation" (2012), Wien
  9. Dover, K. J., "Aristophanic Comedy" (1972), London
  10. Flashar, H., "Formen utopischen Denkens bei den Griechen" (1974), Innsbruck
  11. Flashar, H, "Laughter down the Centuries, Bd. 1. Turku", pp.59~70 (1994)
  12. Hennig, D., "Klassisches Altertum, spätantikes und frühes Christentum. Adolf Lippold zum 65", pp.37~53 (1993), Geburtstag gewidmet
  13. Hubbard, Th. K, "The City as Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama", pp.23~50 (1997), Chapel Hill
  14. Klarer, M, "Frau und Utopie. Zur antiken Tradition moderner Frauenutopien", Arcadia, 26, pp.113~140 (1991)
  15. Lesky, A. 2, "Geschichte der griechischen Literatur" (1963), Bern
  16. Schwinge, E. -R, "Aristophanes und die Utopie", Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 3, pp.43~67 (1997)
  17. Versnel, H. S, "Das antike Theater. Aspekte seiner Geschichte, Rezeption und Aktualität", pp.93~114 (1998), Trier
  18. Zeitlin, F. I, "Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy", pp.167~197 (1999), Cambridge
  19. Zimmermann, B, "Utopisches und Utopie in den Komödien des Aristophanes", Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 9, pp.57~77 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)