본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제도적 동형화를 통한 사회적 협업의 정당성이 공공기관의 협업지속의도에 미치는 영향: 사회적 자본의 조절효과

The Effects of Legitimacy of Social Collaboration through Institutional Isomorphism on Public Institution’s Intention of Future Collaboration: Moderating Role of Social Capital

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 사회적 가치 실현을 위한 공공기관과 사회적경제조직 간 협업관계에 주목하여, 제도적 환경 아래 정당성이 사회적경제조직과의 협업을 지속하고자 하는 공공기관의 의도에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 또한 이러한 협업 관계에 있어 상호 이익을 위한 조정을 용이하게 해주는 사회적 자본의 역할을 고려하였다. 구체적으로, 본 연구는 Dimaggio&Powell(1983)가 제시한 제도적 압력 유형인 강압적 동형화(coerciveisomorphism), 모방적 동형화(mimetic isomorphism), 규범적 동형화(normative isomorphism)를 중심으로제도적 환경 속 정당성 추구 유형을 구분하고, 이러한 정당성이 기관의 사회적경제조직과의 협업지속의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것을 예측하였다. 동시에, Nahapiet & Ghoshal(1998)이 제시한 사회적 자본의 3가지 차원인 구조적 자본(structural capital), 관계적 자본(relational capital), 인지적 자본(cognitive capital)을 활용하여 사회적 자본의 정(+)의 조절효과를 검증하였다. 분석에는 부산지역 사회적경제 활성화를 위한부산 사회적경제 지원 기금조성(BEF)에 참여하는 부산시 및 부산지역 8개 공공기관 구성원으로부터 수집된 설문 데이터 151부를 활용하였다. SPSS 21 통계 패키지를 활용하여 데이터 분석을 수행하였으며, 이를 통해 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 강압적 동형화를 통한 정당성이 공공기관의 사회적경제조직과의협업지속의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 규범적 동형화를 통한 정당성이 공공기관의사회적경제조직과의 협업지속의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 상대적으로 그 효과크기가 강압적 동형화를 통한 정당성이 협업지속의도에 미치는 영향보다 높은 것을 확인하였다. 셋째, 강압적동형화를 통한 정당성이 협업지속의도에 미치는 영향에서 인지적 자본의 정(+)의 조절효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 본 연구가 제시한 가설과는 반대로, 규범적 동형화를 통한 정당성이 협업지속의도에 미치는 영향에서 관계적 자본이 부(-)의 조절효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 통계적 결과와 이론적의의를 바탕으로 사회가치실현이라는 공동목적을 추구하는 공공기관과 사회적경제조직의 협업관계지속에있어 고려할 수 있는 정책적·실무적 시사점을 제시하였다. 이후 연구의 한계점을 짚고 향후 연구방향에대해 제언하였다.

Abstract

Focusing on the collaborative relationship between public institutions and social economic organizations for the realization of social values, this study examined the effects of legitimacy under the institutional environment on the intentions of public institutions to continue cooperation with social economic organizations. Furthermore, the study also considered the role of social capital in this collaborative relationship that facilitates coordination for mutual benefit. Specifically, this study used three institutional pressure types, coercive isomorphism, mimetic isomorphism, normative isomorphism, presented by Dimaggio&Powell(1983) for categorizing the types of legitimacy pursuit in the institutional environment. And it was predicted that these three types of legitimacy would have positive(+) effects on the public institution’s intention to continue social collaboration with social economic organizations. At the same time, the three dimensions of social capital, structural capital, relative capital, cognitive capital, presented by the Nahapiet & Ghoshal(1998) were used to verify the positive(+) moderating effects amid the effects of legitimacy through institutional isomorphism on the public institution’s intention of future collaboration. The analysis utilized 151 survey data collected from members of eight public institutions in the Busan metropolitan city and local government of Busan participating in the Busan Embracement Fund for Social Economic Development (BEF) for the revitalization of the social economy in the Busan metropolitan city. The data analysis was conducted using the SPSS 21 statistical package, and the main findings of the study are as follows. Firstly, the result of the study showed that legitimacy through coercive pressures has a positive(+) influences on the public institution’s intention of future collaboration with social economic organizations. Secondly, the result of the study showed that legitimacy through normative pressures has a positive(+) influences on the public institution’s intention of future collaboration with social economic organizations, and that the effective size of public institution’s intention of future collaboration through normative pressures is the largest. Thirdly, it was shown that cognitive capital has a positive(+) moderating effect amid the influence of legitimacy through coercive pressures on the public institution’s intention of future collaboration. Fourthly, contrary to the hypothesis of this study, it was shown that relative capital had a negative(-) moderating effect amid the influence of legitimacy through normative pressures on the public institution’s intention of future collaboration. Based on the above statistical results and theoretical meanings, policy and practical implications were described that can be considered for the continuation of the cooperative relationship between public institutions and social economic organizations that pursue the common purpose of social value realization.

참고문헌 (103)

  1. "공공기관의 사회적 가치실현에 관한 기본법안", (의안번호: 2001624, 제안일자: 2016. 8. 17, 대표발의: 김경수) 의안원문, ~ (2016)
  2. "공공기관의 정보공개에 관한 법률 제2조", ~
  3. "공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률 제 4조", ~
  4. "공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률 제 5조", ~
  5. "공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률 제 44조", ~
  6. "국가균형발전 특별법 제 18조", ~
  7. "국가를 당사자로 하는 계약에 관한 법률 시행령 제 26조", ~
  8. 공공기관 지방이전의 과제와 발전방향, "월간 공공정책", 2018, 65~67
  9. 기획재정부, "공공기관 경영평가편람(수정)" (2019)
  10. 기획재정부, "’19년 공공기관 혁신가이드라인(안)", ~ (2019)
  11. 김이수, "협력적 관리구조와 조직성과간의 관계에 대한 사회적 자본의 조절효과 분석 - 자원봉사조직을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 28(1), pp.199~230 (2014), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  12. 김혜원, "사회적기업을 위한 새로운 법인격: 쟁점과 대안", 사회적가치와 기업연구, 10(2), pp.93~130 (2017), 사단법인 사회적기업학회[DOI]
  13. 노그림, "강압적 동형화 압력과 의도치 않은 결과: 정부 정책의 모호성, 대기업집단 계열사 다각화, 정부성향을 중심으로", 인사조직연구, 27(2), pp.97~123 (2019), 한국인사조직학회[DOI]
  14. 배성기, "공공기관 및 지방정부 사회적 가치 구현 사례" (2018), 사회적가치연구
  15. 사회적 가치와 공공가치에 관한 연구, "사회적가치연구원", ~ (2019)
  16. "사회적경제기본법안", (의안번호: 2001614, 제안일자: 2016. 8. 17, 대표발의: 윤호중) 의안원문, ~ (2016)
  17. "사회적경제기본법안", (의안번호: 2002616, 제안일자: 2016. 10. 11, 대표발의: 유승민) 의안원문, ~ (2016)
  18. "사회적경제기업제품의 구매촉진 및 판로지원에 관한 특별법안", (의안번호: 2001596, 제안일자: 2016. 8. 16, 대표발의: 서형수) 의안원문, ~ (2016)
  19. "사회적기업 육성법 제 12조", ~
  20. 안나현, "구매자-공급자간의 사회적 자본이 공급사슬의 교환 프로세스와 성과에 미치는 영향: 한국의 사회적 경제조직을 중심으로", 한국생산관리학회지, 27(1), pp.103~126 (2016), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  21. 이경호, "사회적경제 법·제도 현황과 새로운 법체계 고안", 공익과 인권, 17, pp.339~371 (2017)
  22. 이양복, "경영자의 전략적 CSR을 통한 사회적 협업이 성과에 미치는 영향", 전문경영인연구, 22(1), pp.87~104 (2019), 한국전문경영인학회
  23. 이준호, "원전사업자 CSR 효과성과 사회적 자본의 관계에서수혜집단 인지태도의 조절효과: 월성원전 주변지역을 중심으로", 한국행정논집, 30(1), pp.139~163 (2018), 한국정부학회[DOI]
  24. 장성희, "장기지향성이 CSR활동과 사회적 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(5), pp.2703~2712 (2014), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  25. 장한나, "지속적인 휴먼서비스 전달을 위한 협력 네트워크의 회복력에 관한 연구", 정책분석평가학회보, 25(1), pp.279~308 (2015), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
  26. 진관훈, "사회적 자본과 문화성향이 기부지속성에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 사회복지정책, 43(2), pp.111~134 (2016), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
  27. 현광희, "기업사회공헌의 장기협력관계에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구-관계속성의 매개효과를 중심으로-", 사회과학담론과 정책, 10(2), pp.123~148 (2017), 사회과학연구원[DOI]
  28. Adler, P. S., "Social capital : Prospects for a new concept", Academy of Management Review, 27(1), pp.17~40 (2002)
  29. Albareda, L., "The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility : drivers and responses", Business Ethics : A European Review, 17(4), pp.347~363 (2008)
  30. Austin, J. E., "Collaborative Value Creation: A Review of Partnering Between Nonprofits and Businesses: Part I. Value Creation Spectrum and Collaboration Stages", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), pp.726~758 (2012)
  31. Baker, W. E., "Market networks and corporate behavior", American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), pp.589~625 (1990)
  32. Baron, R. M., "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
  33. Berger, I. E., "Social alliances : Company", nonprofit collaboration, 2004, pp.47(1), 58~90
  34. Bolino, M. C., "Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations", Academy of Management Review, 27(4), pp.505~522 (2002)
  35. Borzaga, C., "The emergence of social enterprise" (2004), Psychology Press
  36. Bourdieu, P., "Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education", pp.241~258 (1986), Greenwood
  37. Bradach, J. L., "Price, authority, and trust : From ideal types to plural forms", Annual Review of Sociology, 15, pp.97~118 (1989)
  38. Brown, A. D., "Politics, symbolic action and myth making in pursuit of legitimacy", Organization Studies, 15(6), pp.861~878 (1994)
  39. Browning, L. D., "Building cooperation in a competitive industry : SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry", Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp.113~151 (1995)
  40. Chang, S. C., "Social Capital, Cooperative Performance, and Future Cooperation Intention Among Recreational Farm Area Owners in Taiwan", Social Behavior and Personality : An International Journal, 38(10), pp.1409~1429 (2010)
  41. Chi, T., "The structuring of interfirm exchanges in business know-how : evidence from international collaborative ventures", Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(4), pp.279~294 (1997)
  42. Chiles, T., "Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, Trust, and Transaction Cost Economics", The Academy of Management Review, 21, pp.73~99 (1996)
  43. Coleman, J. S., "Social capital in the creation of human capital", American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.95~120 (1988)
  44. Deephouse, D. L., "The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism", pp.49~77 (2012)
  45. Di Domenico, M., "The dialectic of social exchange : Theorizing corporate—social enterprise collaboration", Organization Studies, 30(8), pp.887~907 (2009)
  46. DiMaggio, P. J., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields", American Sociological Review, pp.147~160 (1983)
  47. Doney, P. M., "An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, 61(2), pp.35~51 (1997)
  48. Downe, A. G., "Relational capital and SME collaborative strategy in the Malaysian service industry", International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 4(2), pp.145~166 (2012)
  49. Social enterprises and their eco-systems: A European mapping report: updated country report, "European Commision", ~ (2016)
  50. Freitas, C. A. S. de, "Isomorphism, institutionalization and legitimacy : operational auditing at the court of auditors", Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 4(1), pp.35~50 (2007)
  51. Fukuyama, F., "Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity" (1995), Free press New York
  52. Ganesan, S., "Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp.1~19 (1994)
  53. García-Villaverde, P. M., "Structural social capital and knowledge acquisition: implications of cluster membership", Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(5-6), pp.1~32 (2018)
  54. Greenwood, R., "Theorizing change : The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields", Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp.58~80 (2002)
  55. Gulati, R., "Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances", Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp.85~112 (1995)
  56. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., "Structure! agency!(and other quarrels) : A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization", Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), pp.61~85 (2009)
  57. Huybrechts, B., "The role of legitimacy in social enterprisecorporate collaboration", Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), pp.130~146 (2013)
  58. Inkpen, A. C., "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer", Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp.146~165 (2005)
  59. Jacobs, J., "The death and life of great American cities" (1993), Penguin Books
  60. Johansson, J., "Challenges to the legitimacy of private forest governance–the development of forest certification in Sweden", Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), pp.424~436 (2012)
  61. Kale, P., "Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances : Building relational capital", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.217~237 (2000)
  62. Karam, C. M., "A cross-cultural and feminist perspective on CSR in developing countries : Uncovering latent power dynamics", Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), pp.461~477 (2017)
  63. Kelley, H, H., "Close relationships", pp.265~314 (1983), Freeman
  64. Krause, D. R., "The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement", Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), pp.528~545 (2007)
  65. Lawrence, T. B., "Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration : The emergence of proto-institutions", Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp.281~290 (2002)
  66. Lawson, B., "Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement", Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), pp.446~460 (2008)
  67. Lee, D. Y., "Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets", Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), pp.28~56 (2005)
  68. Lusch, R. F., "Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels", Journal of Marketing, 60(4), pp.19~38 (1996)
  69. Mair, J., "Social entrepreneurship research : A source of explanation, prediction, and delight", Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.36~44 (2006)
  70. Mankiw, N. G., "Principles of economics" (2014), Cengage Learning
  71. Marano, V., "MNE", NGO partnerships and the legitimacy of the firm, 2012, pp.21(6), 1122~1130
  72. Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized organizations : Formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp.340~363 (1977)
  73. Morgan, R. M., "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp.20~38 (1994)
  74. Murnighan, J. K., "Research in Organizational Behavior", pp.83~123 (1994), JAI Press
  75. Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
  76. Nelson, J., "Partnership Alchemy: New social partnerships for Europe", pp.2000, Copenhagen Centre
  77. Ortiz, B., "Relationships between structural social capital, knowledge identification capability and external knowledge acquisition", European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), pp.48~66 (2017)
  78. Ouchi, W. G., "Markets, bureaucracies, and clans", Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.129~141 (1980)
  79. Palmatier, R. W., "Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing : a meta-analysis", Journal of Marketing, 70(4), pp.136~153 (2006)
  80. Parra-Requena, G., "Social capital and effective innovation in industrial districts : dual effect of absorptive capacity", Industry and Innovation, 20(2), pp.157~179 (2013)
  81. Pfeffer, J., "The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective" (2003), Stanford University Press
  82. Phillips, N., "Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields", Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), pp.23~43 (2000)
  83. Portes, A., "Social capital : Its origins and applications in modern sociology", Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), pp.1~24 (1998)
  84. Putnam, R., "The prosperous community : Social capital and public life", The American Prospect, 4(13) (1993)
  85. Ring, P. S., "Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships", Academy of Management Review, 19(1), pp.90~118 (1994)
  86. Rivard, S., "Information technology outsourcing" (2015), Routledge
  87. Ronald, B., "Structural holes: The social structure of competition" (1992), Harvard
  88. Sabel, C. F., "Studied trust : Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy", Human Relations, 46(9), pp.1133~1170 (1993)
  89. Sakarya, S., "Social alliances : Business and social enterprise collaboration for social transformation", Journal of Business Research, 65(12), pp.1710~1720 (2012)
  90. Sandström, A., "Legitimacy in co-management : The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies", Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), pp.60~76 (2014)
  91. Scott, W. R., "Foundations for organizational science" (1995), A Sage Publication
  92. Simmons, B. A., "Introduction : The international diffusion of liberalism", International Organization, 60(4), pp.781~810 (2006)
  93. Smith, K. G., "Intra-and interorganizational cooperation : Toward a research agenda", Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp.7~23 (1995)
  94. Stiglitz, J. E., "The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future" (2012), WW Norton & Company
  95. Suchman, M. C., "Managing legitimacy : Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.571~610 (1995)
  96. Thomson, A. M., "Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), pp.23~56 (2007)
  97. Tsai, W., "Social capital and value creation : The role of intrafirm networks", Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp.464~476 (1998)
  98. Villena, V. H., "The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships : A social capital perspective", Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), pp.561~576 (2011)
  99. Waddock, S. A., "A typology of social partnership organizations", Administration & Society, 22(4), pp.480~515 (1991)
  100. Yan, A., "Antecedents and effects of parent control in international joint ventures", Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), pp.393~416 (2001)
  101. Young, D. R., "Alternative Models of Government-Nonprofit Sector Relations : Theoretical and International Perspectives", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), pp.149~172 (2000)
  102. Zhou, K. Z., "Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China", Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), pp.88~98 (2014)
  103. Zucker, L. G., "Organizations as institutions", Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2(1), pp.1~47 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)