본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아테네 해상제국과 신들의 경쟁-고전기 건축과 문학에 투영된 포세이돈과 아테나-

Athens’ Thalassocracy and The Contention of Athena and Poseidon

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The myth of the contention between Athena and Poseidon for Attica isrepresented both in the pediment of the Parthenon and the temple ofErechtheion. In this article, I argue that the story of the struggle betweenAthena and Poseidon for Attica symbolizes the struggle between land powerand sea power and Poseidon gained more importance during in the latter partof the fifth century BC. Athena represented the traditional society based on theland and hoplites while Poseidon represented Athens’ thalassocracy and Nautesespecially after the Delian League. During the Peloponnesian war, the sea power became more crucial for avictory against Sparta, which means Poseidon gained more importance for theAthenians. The construction of Erechtheion in spite of the difficult economicsituation during the Peloponnesian war symbolizes the rising importance ofPoseidon. However among Athenians, there were people against the policy ofthalassocracy.The representative writers are Euripides and Platon. Euripides’ theErechtheus and Platon’s Atlantis-story were written to criticize Poseidon andAthens’ thalassocracy.

Abstract

The myth of the contention between Athena and Poseidon for Attica isrepresented both in the pediment of the Parthenon and the temple ofErechtheion. In this article, I argue that the story of the struggle betweenAthena and Poseidon for Attica symbolizes the struggle between land powerand sea power and Poseidon gained more importance during in the latter partof the fifth century BC. Athena represented the traditional society based on theland and hoplites while Poseidon represented Athens’ thalassocracy and Nautesespecially after the Delian League. During the Peloponnesian war, the sea power became more crucial for avictory against Sparta, which means Poseidon gained more importance for theAthenians. The construction of Erechtheion in spite of the difficult economicsituation during the Peloponnesian war symbolizes the rising importance ofPoseidon. However among Athenians, there were people against the policy ofthalassocracy.The representative writers are Euripides and Platon. Euripides’ theErechtheus and Platon’s Atlantis-story were written to criticize Poseidon andAthens’ thalassocracy.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Aristophanes, "Hippes", Loeb Classical Library
  2. Aristophanes, "Eirene", Loeb Classical Library
  3. Aristophanes, "Sphekes", Loeb Classical Library
  4. Euripides, "Troiades", Loeb Classical Library
  5. Herodotos, "Historiai", Loeb Classical Library
  6. Pausanias, "Periegesis", Loeb Classical Library
  7. Platon, "Timaios", Loeb Classical Library
  8. Platon, "Kritias", Loeb Classical Library
  9. Xenophon, "Memorabilia", Loeb Classical Library
  10. Binder, J., "GRBS Monograph 10", pp.15~22 (1984)
  11. Connelly, J. B., "Parthenon and Parthenoi: A Mythological Interpretation of the Parthenon Frieze", American Journal of Archaeology, 100(1), pp.53~80 (1996)
  12. Furtwangler, A., "Masterpieces of Greek Sculpture" (1895), Heinemann
  13. Hurwit, J., "The Acropolis in the Age of Pericles" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  14. Jeppesen, J.K., "The Pedimental Compositions of the Parthenon", Acta Arch, 24, pp.79~80 (1953)
  15. Michaelis, A., "Der Parthenon" (1871), Breitkopf und Härtel
  16. Mikalson, J. D., "Erechheus and the Panathenaia", AJPh, 97 (1976)
  17. Mulroy, D., "The Subtle Artistry of the “Minos” and the “Hipparchus”", Transactions of the American Philological Association, 137(1), pp.115~131 (2007)
  18. O’Neill, E. G. Jr., "The Prologue of the Troades of Euripides", Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 72, pp.288~320 (1941)
  19. Neils, J., "Reconfiguring the Gods on the Parthenon Frieze", The Art Bulletin, 81(1), pp.6~20 (1999)
  20. Palagia, O., "The Pediments of the Parthenon" (1993), Brill
  21. Parker, R., "Interpretations of Greek Mythology" (1987), Croom Helm
  22. Parker, R., "Athenian Religion" (1997), Clarendon Press
  23. Pritchett, W. K., "Greek State at War, III" (1979), University of California Press
  24. Ridgway, B., "Review of F. Brommer, Die Giebel des Parthenon-Eine Einfiuhrung, Mainz 1959", AJA, 64 (1960)
  25. Shapiro, H. A., "Art and Cult under the Tyrants in Athens" (1989), P. von Zabern
  26. Sourvinou-Inwood, C., "A Reading of two Fragments of Sophilos", The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 128, pp.128~131 (2008)
  27. Spaeth, B.S., "Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon", Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 60(3), pp.331~362 (1991)
  28. Walker, H., "Theseus and Athens", Oxford University Press
  29. Williams, B., "What Was Wrong with Minos? Thucydides and Historical Time", Representations, 74(1), pp.1~18 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)