3, 4차 북핵실험 이후 북중관계와 동맹 딜레마
Sino-North Korean relations and alliance dilemma after the 3rd and 4th nuclear tests
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Sino-North Korean relations have reached a new deadlock after North Korea’s fourth nuclear test in January 2016. Particularly, China faces a very difficult position in the international community. As one of the G2 it is required to join sanctions against North Korea, but at the same time it needs to help the country according to their pact of alliance. When North Korea tested its third nuclear test, China had been rather harsh on North Korean leadership. Unlike the latter’s first and third nuclear tests, China actively participated in the UN sanctions and openly criticized the regime for its third nuclear test. However as time passed, it was revealed that China’s sanctions against North Korea was toothless and short-lived. China lifted the ban on oil export to North Korea, which has been a lifeline for the regime. Sino-North Korea trade had not declined. With North Korea’s fourth nuclear test, the trade between the two countries even increased. This paper examines the reasons behind China’s inability to abandon North Korea even though it displayed apparent participation in sanctions against the regime. In so doing, the paper shows that China is facing an alliance dilemma and that North Korea’s geopolitical and strategic value serve as the ‘Weak State Power’ against China.
Abstract
Sino-North Korean relations have reached a new deadlock after North Korea’s fourth nuclear test in January 2016. Particularly, China faces a very difficult position in the international community. As one of the G2 it is required to join sanctions against North Korea, but at the same time it needs to help the country according to their pact of alliance. When North Korea tested its third nuclear test, China had been rather harsh on North Korean leadership. Unlike the latter’s first and third nuclear tests, China actively participated in the UN sanctions and openly criticized the regime for its third nuclear test. However as time passed, it was revealed that China’s sanctions against North Korea was toothless and short-lived. China lifted the ban on oil export to North Korea, which has been a lifeline for the regime. Sino-North Korea trade had not declined. With North Korea’s fourth nuclear test, the trade between the two countries even increased. This paper examines the reasons behind China’s inability to abandon North Korea even though it displayed apparent participation in sanctions against the regime. In so doing, the paper shows that China is facing an alliance dilemma and that North Korea’s geopolitical and strategic value serve as the ‘Weak State Power’ against China.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강정일, "북중동맹의 공고성에 관한 연구", 전략연구, 19(54), pp.127~153 (2012), (사) 한국전략문제연구소
- 김태현, "비대칭 동맹에서 약소국의 자율성에 대한 연구: 2차 북핵 위기시 북 중관계를 중심으로", 신아세아, 18(1), pp.189~213 (2011), 신아시아연구소
- "北중앙통신, 리수용-시진핑 면담 보도…내용은 조금달라" (2016)[URL]
- 동아일보, "북한, 첫 수소탄 핵실험 전격 실시…조선중앙TV 발표", 동아일보(2016. 1. 6), ~ (2016)
- 박홍서, "북핵위기시 중국의 대북 동맹안보딜레마 관리 연구: -대미관계의 변화를 주요 동인으로", 국제정치논총, 46(1), pp.103~122 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
- 서상문, "중국의 대한반도 정책의 지속과 변화 : 역사와 현실", 전략연구, 21(63), pp.65~103 (2014), (사) 한국전략문제연구소
- 성백웅, "2013년 남북교역과 북중무역의 동향비교", Trade Foucus, 13(9) (2014)
- "북핵 중국책임론은 억지, 북중관계 적대관계 되지 않을 것" (2016)[URL]
- "中, 대북접근법 바뀌어야…韓美日 등 국제사회 중국압박" (2016)[URL]
- 연합뉴스, "<연합시론> 초강력 대북 제재, 중국의 이행 의지가 관건이다", 연합뉴스(2016.2.16), ~ (2016)
- "대북제재 첫달 북중교역 20%↑…中이행성적 일단 '불합격'" (2016)[URL]
- "中외교수장, 美 심장부서 "평화협정도 논의해야" 작심 발언" (2016)[URL]
- "장쩌민•후진타오•시진핑의두뇌 ‘왕후닝’" (2013)[URL]
- 이영학, "북한의 세 차례 핵실험과 중국의 대북한 정책 변화 분석", 국제정치논총, 53(4), pp.191~223 (2013), 한국국제정치학회
- 이춘복, "북한 3차 핵실험 후 중국의 북중관계", jpi 정책포럼, pp.3~4 (2013)
- 전리리, "북한 핵실험과 중국-북한 관계 변화", 동양문화연구, 18, pp.279~317 (2014), 동양문화연구원
- "류윈산-김정은 회동…6자회담 재개•북중 대화•교류 확대", 조선닷컴(2015.10.10), ~ (2015)
- "한민구 국방장관 北 4차 핵실험 수소탄 아니다" (2016)[URL]
- 2013년 하반기 북핵문제 및 남북관계 전망과 대응전략, "조한범", 통일연구원, ~ (2013)
- 2013년 북한 무력시위 국면의 승자와 패자, "조한범", 통일연구원, 1~3 (2013)
- "중국의 대북 정책이 어찌 일관(一貫)될 수 있는가", 중화왕 (中華網, 2013. 8. 6), ~ (2013)
- 최명해, "1960년대 북한의 대중국 동맹딜레마와 ‘계산된 모험주의’", 국제정치논총, 48(3), pp.119~148 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
- "왕이 中 외교부장 방미... 대북제재 최종 조율" (2016)[URL]
- 해리슨 E. 솔즈베리, "새로운 황제들", pp.172~176 (2013), 다섯수레
- 홍석훈, "중국의 대북한 외교정책 기조와 전략: 중국 지도부의 인식과 정책선호도를 중심으로", 정치·정보연구, 17(1), pp.123~145 (2014), 한국정치정보학회
- "왕자루이 북중, 일반적 국가 관계" (2013)[URL]
- "대북제재로 민생타격은 비인도적" (2016)[URL]
- Stephen M. Walt, "The Origins of Alliances", pp.1~12 (1987), Cornell Univ. Press
- Glenn H Snyder, "Alliance Politics", pp.180~188 (1997), Cornell University Press