가상 현실 신경학적 검사 교육 도구(VRNET) 버전 2.0을 의과대학 학생 교육에 적용한 경험
Experience of using the Virtual Reality Neurologic Examination Teaching tool (Version 2.0) to educate medical students
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: In 2018, we developed a Virtual Reality Neurologic Examination Teaching tool (VRNET) to educate medical students on the neurological symptoms of the eye and face that could not be easily simulated by standardized patients (SP). VRNET 2.0, an enhanced version, facilitates neurological examinations of the arms and legs, thereby eliminating the need for SP and relying solely on the program for education. This study introduces VRNET 2.0 and reports its application in medical student education. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the responses to a questionnaire administered to 362 fourth-year medical students after the completion of a practice run from March 2018 to October 2021. The questionnaire included questions on satisfaction, difficulty, appropriateness of time allocation, expectation, and achievement of learning goals. Results: Compared to the training method using SP + VRNET in 2019, training using VRNET 2.0 in 2021 was found to be superior in terms of satisfaction (8.18 [SP+VRNET] vs 8.81 [VRNET 2.0], p=.011) and difficulty (7.95 [SP+VRNET] vs 7.25 [VRNET 2.0], p=.040). Conclusion: Neurologic examination training using VRNET 2.0 for medical students showed higher satisfaction and lower difficulty than the training program combining SP and VRNET. Further research is essential to assess the actual educational effectiveness of VRNET 2.0.
Abstract
Background: In 2018, we developed a Virtual Reality Neurologic Examination Teaching tool (VRNET) to educate medical students on the neurological symptoms of the eye and face that could not be easily simulated by standardized patients (SP). VRNET 2.0, an enhanced version, facilitates neurological examinations of the arms and legs, thereby eliminating the need for SP and relying solely on the program for education. This study introduces VRNET 2.0 and reports its application in medical student education. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the responses to a questionnaire administered to 362 fourth-year medical students after the completion of a practice run from March 2018 to October 2021. The questionnaire included questions on satisfaction, difficulty, appropriateness of time allocation, expectation, and achievement of learning goals. Results: Compared to the training method using SP + VRNET in 2019, training using VRNET 2.0 in 2021 was found to be superior in terms of satisfaction (8.18 [SP+VRNET] vs 8.81 [VRNET 2.0], p=.011) and difficulty (7.95 [SP+VRNET] vs 7.25 [VRNET 2.0], p=.040). Conclusion: Neurologic examination training using VRNET 2.0 for medical students showed higher satisfaction and lower difficulty than the training program combining SP and VRNET. Further research is essential to assess the actual educational effectiveness of VRNET 2.0.
참고문헌 (21)
- Blood AD, "Neurology objective structured clinical examination reliability using generalizability theory", Neurology, 85(18), pp.1623~1629 (2015)[DOI]
- Lukas RV, "Student assessment by objective structured examination in a neurology clerkship", Neurology, 79(7), pp.681~685 (2012)[DOI]
- Safdieh JE, "Standardized patient outcomes trial(SPOT)in neurology", Med Educ Online, 16(1), pp.5634~ (2011)[DOI]
- Han SG, "Virtual reality-based neurological examination teaching tool(VRNET)versus standardized patient in teaching neurological examinations for the medical students : a randomized, single-blind study", BMC Med Educ, 21(1), pp.1~8 (2021)[DOI]
- Baniasadi T, "Challenges and practical considerations in applying virtual reality in medical education and treatment", Oman Med J, 35(3), pp.e125~ (2020)[DOI]
- Nielsen MR, "Clinical ultrasound education for medical students : virtual reality versus e-learning, a randomized controlled pilot trial", Ultrasound Q, 37(3), pp.292~296 (2021)[DOI]
- Moro C, "Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Anat Sci Educ, 14(3), pp.368~376 (2021)[DOI]
- De Ponti R, "Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic : a report on students’perception", BMC Med Educ, 20, pp.1~7 (2020)[DOI]
- Smigelski M, "Urology virtual education programs during the COVID-19 pandemic", Curr Urol Rep, 21, pp.1~4 (2020)[DOI]
- Watari T, "The utility of virtual patient simulations for clinical reasoning education", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(15), pp.5325~ (2020)[DOI]
- Bracq M-S, "Virtual reality simulation in nontechnical skills training for healthcare professionals : a systematic review", Simul Healthc, 14(3), pp.188~194 (2019)[DOI]
- Nas J, "Effect of face-to-face vs virtual reality training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality : a randomized clinical trial", JAMA Cardiol, 5(3), pp.328~335 (2020)[DOI]
- Shafer DM, "Modern virtual reality technology : cybersickness, sense of presence, and gender", Media Psychology Review, 11(2), pp.1~ (2017)
- Huber T, "New dimensions in surgical training : immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff", Surg Endosc, 31, pp.4472~4477 (2017)[DOI]
- Harrington CM, "360 operative videos : a randomised cross-over study evaluating attentiveness and information retention", J Surg Educ, 75(4), pp.993~1000 (2018)[DOI]
- Mangano A, "Virtual reality simulator systems in robotic surgical training", Surg Technol Int, 32, pp.19~23 (2018)
- Bing EG, "Using low-cost virtual reality simulation to build surgical capacity for cervical cancer treatment", J Glob Oncol, 5, pp.1~7 (2019)[DOI]
- Gallagher AG, "Virtual reality simulation for the operating room : proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training", Ann Surg, 241(2), pp.364~ (2005)[DOI]
- 계보경, "Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, pp.1~13 (2021), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
- Kassutto SM, "Virtual, augmented, and alternate reality in medical education : socially distanced but fully immersed", ATS Sch, 2(4), pp.651~664 (2021)[DOI]
- Pottle J, "Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education", Future Healthc J, 6(3), pp.181~ (2019)[DOI]