본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의 핵농축 권한에 대한 소고

A Study on South Korea’s Right to Enrich

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Securing the right to enrich is, in essence, a necessary proposition as a sovereign state. While there are no current international laws prohibiting uranium enrichment and reprocessing for peaceful purposes, the United States strictly bans enrichment and reprocessing through the bilateral nuclear agreement. As the majority of South Korea’s prominent politicians and the vast majority of South Korean nuclear experts believe that a nuclear bomb would in the long term be a threat to their national interests, South Korea has ever maintained its stance that the 1992 denuclearization joint statement with North Korea, in addition to the nuclear cooperation pact with the United States remains valid. South Korea acknowledges that possession of nuclear weapons would provide only a short-term regional advantage that would turn into a longer-term vulnerability, because sooner or later, Japan, which many nuclear pundits claim is on the threshold of a de-facto nuclear-armed state in many respects, would follow suit and a regional nuclear arms race would be inescapable. The technical choices South Korea has made in the configuration of the nuclear program demonstrate a strong preference for a robust enrichment capability rather than for a rapid nuclear weapons breakout capability. Given that South Korea’s development program is focused on next-generation technology in terms of nuclear export, it is time to consider how to obtain the right to enrich, including the possibility of nullifying the dead-on-arrival 1992 denuclearization declaration.

Abstract

Securing the right to enrich is, in essence, a necessary proposition as a sovereign state. While there are no current international laws prohibiting uranium enrichment and reprocessing for peaceful purposes, the United States strictly bans enrichment and reprocessing through the bilateral nuclear agreement. As the majority of South Korea’s prominent politicians and the vast majority of South Korean nuclear experts believe that a nuclear bomb would in the long term be a threat to their national interests, South Korea has ever maintained its stance that the 1992 denuclearization joint statement with North Korea, in addition to the nuclear cooperation pact with the United States remains valid. South Korea acknowledges that possession of nuclear weapons would provide only a short-term regional advantage that would turn into a longer-term vulnerability, because sooner or later, Japan, which many nuclear pundits claim is on the threshold of a de-facto nuclear-armed state in many respects, would follow suit and a regional nuclear arms race would be inescapable. The technical choices South Korea has made in the configuration of the nuclear program demonstrate a strong preference for a robust enrichment capability rather than for a rapid nuclear weapons breakout capability. Given that South Korea’s development program is focused on next-generation technology in terms of nuclear export, it is time to consider how to obtain the right to enrich, including the possibility of nullifying the dead-on-arrival 1992 denuclearization declaration.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김성준, "한국 원자력 기술 체제 형성과 변화, 1953-1980", 박사, 협동과정 과학사및과학철학전공, pp.2012
  2. 한미원자력협력협정 성공한 협상인가, "박지영", 아산정책연구원, ~, pp.<이슈브리프>, 2015-09 (2015)
  3. 신기조, "신기조 회고록: 전력외길 57년" (2005)
  4. "원자력 추진 잠수함 건조 능력 확보했다" (2020)[URL]
  5. 오원철, "박정희 카터 혈투와 핵개발 강행", 신동아, ~ (1994)
  6. 이정훈, "한국의 핵주권", 신동아 부록, ~ (2006)
  7. 한국원자력연구원, "원자력협력협정 해설서" (2008), 한국원자력연구원
  8. 한국전력공사, "한국전기백년사" (1989), 한국전력공사
  9. "U.S.–South Korean Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreement" (2015)[URL]
  10. "Oak Ridge" (2020)[URL]
  11. "‘핵비확산 원칙’ 앞세운 美, 韓과 핵잠 연료 놓고 줄다리기 예고" (2020)[URL]
  12. "방위비 협상, 줄 것 주고 크게 받자" (2019)[URL]
  13. "박정희 정권 핵개발 책임자 오원철 전 수석, 30년 만에 입 열다" (2010)[URL]
  14. "(5)한국핵연료개발공단" (1976)[URL]
  15. "김현종, 독자 핵추진 잠수함 건조 위해 방위비와 빅딜 노리나" (2020)[URL]
  16. Strobe Talbott, "Engaging India : Diplomacy, Democracy, and the Bomb" (2006), The Brookings Institution
  17. "The NPT at 50: Perish or Survive?" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)