내시경과 복부초음파 당일 검사에서 복부초음파 영상의 화질 개선에 관한 연구
Assessment of Image Quality According to Pressure of Transducer during Abdominal Ultrasonography
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
SNR and CNR were evaluated to investigate using for harmonic technique, Compositeimage and technique to reduce speckle artifact reducing the stomach, duodenum, and intestinalgas artifacts through transducer compression and position changes to obtain a good image ofthe abdominal organs (centered on the pancreas) in abdominal ultrasonography performedafter gastroscopy, abdominal ultrasound examination after colon cleansing and abdominalultrasonography performed after simultaneous gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Statistical analysiswas performed using Robust Analysis of Variance, which was performed using the raov functionof Rfit and the raov function including the main effect and all order interactions. We calculatedthe rank - based variance analysis for all 2k - 1 hypotheses. The statistical program was analyzedwith the Rov function of the Rfit package of the R program and the post test for the significantresults was calculated through the least significant difference (the significance correction usingthe Hochberg method). The following conclusions were quantitative and qualitative analysis ofpancreatic head images of examines who examined endoscopy and abdominal ultrasonographyon the day of health examination. In quantitative evaluation, SNR and CNR showed statisticallysignificant differences in abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal ultrasonography, and weightgroup, and there was a significant interaction between abdominal ultrasonography and weight group. The results of qualitative evaluation showed that there were differences in the clarity,internal structure, and visual range of the pancreatic head according to the pressure and thechange of the position, and the order of abdominal ultrasonography and weight group wereaffected. Quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that the use of harmonic, real-timesynthetic imaging technique, and reduction of the speckle artifact were performed in the caseof normal body weight. Abdominal ultrasonography can be performed after endoscopic, postoperative,intestinal, and gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations with appropriate transducercompression and changes in position according to intraperitoneal gas and fluid flow in theintestinal tract. Patient with overweight, it is appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasonographybefore gastroscopy and after gastroscopy. In the case of obesity, abdominal ultrasonographyshould be performed before endoscopy to avoid obstruction of artifacts such as gastric andintestinal gas and intestinal fluid by attenuation due to subcutaneous fat or visceral fat of theabdominal wall. In order to remove stomach and intestinal gas that should be using for harmonictechnique, Composite image and technique to reduce speckle artifact.
Abstract
SNR and CNR were evaluated to investigate using for harmonic technique, Compositeimage and technique to reduce speckle artifact reducing the stomach, duodenum, and intestinalgas artifacts through transducer compression and position changes to obtain a good image ofthe abdominal organs (centered on the pancreas) in abdominal ultrasonography performedafter gastroscopy, abdominal ultrasound examination after colon cleansing and abdominalultrasonography performed after simultaneous gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Statistical analysiswas performed using Robust Analysis of Variance, which was performed using the raov functionof Rfit and the raov function including the main effect and all order interactions. We calculatedthe rank - based variance analysis for all 2k - 1 hypotheses. The statistical program was analyzedwith the Rov function of the Rfit package of the R program and the post test for the significantresults was calculated through the least significant difference (the significance correction usingthe Hochberg method). The following conclusions were quantitative and qualitative analysis ofpancreatic head images of examines who examined endoscopy and abdominal ultrasonographyon the day of health examination. In quantitative evaluation, SNR and CNR showed statisticallysignificant differences in abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal ultrasonography, and weightgroup, and there was a significant interaction between abdominal ultrasonography and weight group. The results of qualitative evaluation showed that there were differences in the clarity,internal structure, and visual range of the pancreatic head according to the pressure and thechange of the position, and the order of abdominal ultrasonography and weight group wereaffected. Quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that the use of harmonic, real-timesynthetic imaging technique, and reduction of the speckle artifact were performed in the caseof normal body weight. Abdominal ultrasonography can be performed after endoscopic, postoperative,intestinal, and gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations with appropriate transducercompression and changes in position according to intraperitoneal gas and fluid flow in theintestinal tract. Patient with overweight, it is appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasonographybefore gastroscopy and after gastroscopy. In the case of obesity, abdominal ultrasonographyshould be performed before endoscopy to avoid obstruction of artifacts such as gastric andintestinal gas and intestinal fluid by attenuation due to subcutaneous fat or visceral fat of theabdominal wall. In order to remove stomach and intestinal gas that should be using for harmonictechnique, Composite image and technique to reduce speckle artifact.
참고문헌 (17)
- Choudhry S, "Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal diseas", Radio. Graphics, 20(4), pp.1127~1135 (2000)
- Chung JB, "Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic cancer guided by ultrasonography", Korean J. Intern. Med, 4(2), pp.125~129 (1989)
- Jeong PJ, "Basic Knowledge of Ultrasonography and Its Clinical Use", Korean J. Endocr. Surg, 8(1), pp.1~6 (2008)
- Jespersen SK, "Multi-angle compound imaging", Ultrason. Imaging, 20(2), pp.81~102 (1998)
- Jung SY, "Korean National Guidelines on Screening and Surveillance for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancers", Korean J. Soc. Gastro. Endo, 24(6), pp.317~320 (2002)
- 김백섭, "다층 표현에서 비등방성 확산을 이용한 초음파 영상 품질 향상", 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 39(12), pp.973~979 (2012), 한국정보과학회
- Kim DY, "Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Liver Diseases", Surgical Ultrasound J, 2(1), pp.7~15 (2015)
- Kim MY., "Optimal Scanning of Abdominal Ultrasonography and Trouble Shootings", Clinical and Molecular Hepatology J. Liver Week, pp.506~517 (2018)
- Kim WH, "Gastric varices: diagnosis with duplex Doppler ultrasonography-a case report", Yonsei Med. J, 33(2), pp.189~193 (1992)
- 곽종길, "복부초음파 검사 시 탐촉자 압박에 따른 영상 화질 평가", 방사선산업학회지, 12(3), pp.199~207 (2018), (사)한국방사선산업학회[DOI]
- 이재영, "담낭의 고해상도 초음파 검사: 최신 영상 기법의 가치", ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 24(4), pp.169~175 (2005), 대한초음파의학회
- Lee MY., "The study on the prevalence Rate and Developmental Factors of the Liver Diseases Diagnosed by Ultrasonography", Radiological science Dept., pp.2007
- 나명주, "음악요법이 위내시경 대상자의 검사전 불안에? 미치는 효과", 성인간호학회지, 15(2), pp.247~255 (2003), 한국성인간호학회
- Park SE, "Abdominal Ultrasonography: Procedure and Training", Korean J. Fam. Pract, 4(1), pp.28~37 (2014)
- Seo BK, "Does Real-time Compound Imaging Improve Evaluation of Breast Cancer Compared to Conventional Sonography?", Korean J. Soc. Breast Cancer, 5(2), pp.102~107 (2002)
- 서영란, "췌장의 초음파 화질 평가: 조직 하모닉 영상과 기본 영상의 비교", ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 21(3), pp.165~169 (2002), 대한초음파의학회
- Shapiro RS, "Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography", American J. Roentgenology, 171(5), pp.1203~1206 (1998)
