본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

내시경과 복부초음파 당일 검사에서 복부초음파 영상의 화질 개선에 관한 연구

Assessment of Image Quality According to Pressure of Transducer during Abdominal Ultrasonography

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

SNR and CNR were evaluated to investigate using for harmonic technique, Compositeimage and technique to reduce speckle artifact reducing the stomach, duodenum, and intestinalgas artifacts through transducer compression and position changes to obtain a good image ofthe abdominal organs (centered on the pancreas) in abdominal ultrasonography performedafter gastroscopy, abdominal ultrasound examination after colon cleansing and abdominalultrasonography performed after simultaneous gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Statistical analysiswas performed using Robust Analysis of Variance, which was performed using the raov functionof Rfit and the raov function including the main effect and all order interactions. We calculatedthe rank - based variance analysis for all 2k - 1 hypotheses. The statistical program was analyzedwith the Rov function of the Rfit package of the R program and the post test for the significantresults was calculated through the least significant difference (the significance correction usingthe Hochberg method). The following conclusions were quantitative and qualitative analysis ofpancreatic head images of examines who examined endoscopy and abdominal ultrasonographyon the day of health examination. In quantitative evaluation, SNR and CNR showed statisticallysignificant differences in abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal ultrasonography, and weightgroup, and there was a significant interaction between abdominal ultrasonography and weight group. The results of qualitative evaluation showed that there were differences in the clarity,internal structure, and visual range of the pancreatic head according to the pressure and thechange of the position, and the order of abdominal ultrasonography and weight group wereaffected. Quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that the use of harmonic, real-timesynthetic imaging technique, and reduction of the speckle artifact were performed in the caseof normal body weight. Abdominal ultrasonography can be performed after endoscopic, postoperative,intestinal, and gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations with appropriate transducercompression and changes in position according to intraperitoneal gas and fluid flow in theintestinal tract. Patient with overweight, it is appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasonographybefore gastroscopy and after gastroscopy. In the case of obesity, abdominal ultrasonographyshould be performed before endoscopy to avoid obstruction of artifacts such as gastric andintestinal gas and intestinal fluid by attenuation due to subcutaneous fat or visceral fat of theabdominal wall. In order to remove stomach and intestinal gas that should be using for harmonictechnique, Composite image and technique to reduce speckle artifact.

Abstract

SNR and CNR were evaluated to investigate using for harmonic technique, Compositeimage and technique to reduce speckle artifact reducing the stomach, duodenum, and intestinalgas artifacts through transducer compression and position changes to obtain a good image ofthe abdominal organs (centered on the pancreas) in abdominal ultrasonography performedafter gastroscopy, abdominal ultrasound examination after colon cleansing and abdominalultrasonography performed after simultaneous gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Statistical analysiswas performed using Robust Analysis of Variance, which was performed using the raov functionof Rfit and the raov function including the main effect and all order interactions. We calculatedthe rank - based variance analysis for all 2k - 1 hypotheses. The statistical program was analyzedwith the Rov function of the Rfit package of the R program and the post test for the significantresults was calculated through the least significant difference (the significance correction usingthe Hochberg method). The following conclusions were quantitative and qualitative analysis ofpancreatic head images of examines who examined endoscopy and abdominal ultrasonographyon the day of health examination. In quantitative evaluation, SNR and CNR showed statisticallysignificant differences in abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal ultrasonography, and weightgroup, and there was a significant interaction between abdominal ultrasonography and weight group. The results of qualitative evaluation showed that there were differences in the clarity,internal structure, and visual range of the pancreatic head according to the pressure and thechange of the position, and the order of abdominal ultrasonography and weight group wereaffected. Quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that the use of harmonic, real-timesynthetic imaging technique, and reduction of the speckle artifact were performed in the caseof normal body weight. Abdominal ultrasonography can be performed after endoscopic, postoperative,intestinal, and gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations with appropriate transducercompression and changes in position according to intraperitoneal gas and fluid flow in theintestinal tract. Patient with overweight, it is appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasonographybefore gastroscopy and after gastroscopy. In the case of obesity, abdominal ultrasonographyshould be performed before endoscopy to avoid obstruction of artifacts such as gastric andintestinal gas and intestinal fluid by attenuation due to subcutaneous fat or visceral fat of theabdominal wall. In order to remove stomach and intestinal gas that should be using for harmonictechnique, Composite image and technique to reduce speckle artifact.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Choudhry S, "Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal diseas", Radio. Graphics, 20(4), pp.1127~1135 (2000)
  2. Chung JB, "Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic cancer guided by ultrasonography", Korean J. Intern. Med, 4(2), pp.125~129 (1989)
  3. Jeong PJ, "Basic Knowledge of Ultrasonography and Its Clinical Use", Korean J. Endocr. Surg, 8(1), pp.1~6 (2008)
  4. Jespersen SK, "Multi-angle compound imaging", Ultrason. Imaging, 20(2), pp.81~102 (1998)
  5. Jung SY, "Korean National Guidelines on Screening and Surveillance for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancers", Korean J. Soc. Gastro. Endo, 24(6), pp.317~320 (2002)
  6. 김백섭, "다층 표현에서 비등방성 확산을 이용한 초음파 영상 품질 향상", 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 39(12), pp.973~979 (2012), 한국정보과학회
  7. Kim DY, "Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Liver Diseases", Surgical Ultrasound J, 2(1), pp.7~15 (2015)
  8. Kim MY., "Optimal Scanning of Abdominal Ultrasonography and Trouble Shootings", Clinical and Molecular Hepatology J. Liver Week, pp.506~517 (2018)
  9. Kim WH, "Gastric varices: diagnosis with duplex Doppler ultrasonography-a case report", Yonsei Med. J, 33(2), pp.189~193 (1992)
  10. 곽종길, "복부초음파 검사 시 탐촉자 압박에 따른 영상 화질 평가", 방사선산업학회지, 12(3), pp.199~207 (2018), (사)한국방사선산업학회[DOI]
  11. 이재영, "담낭의 고해상도 초음파 검사: 최신 영상 기법의 가치", ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 24(4), pp.169~175 (2005), 대한초음파의학회
  12. Lee MY., "The study on the prevalence Rate and Developmental Factors of the Liver Diseases Diagnosed by Ultrasonography", Radiological science Dept., pp.2007
  13. 나명주, "음악요법이 위내시경 대상자의 검사전 불안에? 미치는 효과", 성인간호학회지, 15(2), pp.247~255 (2003), 한국성인간호학회
  14. Park SE, "Abdominal Ultrasonography: Procedure and Training", Korean J. Fam. Pract, 4(1), pp.28~37 (2014)
  15. Seo BK, "Does Real-time Compound Imaging Improve Evaluation of Breast Cancer Compared to Conventional Sonography?", Korean J. Soc. Breast Cancer, 5(2), pp.102~107 (2002)
  16. 서영란, "췌장의 초음파 화질 평가: 조직 하모닉 영상과 기본 영상의 비교", ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 21(3), pp.165~169 (2002), 대한초음파의학회
  17. Shapiro RS, "Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography", American J. Roentgenology, 171(5), pp.1203~1206 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

복부초음파 검사 시 탐촉자 압박과 체위 변화에 따른 영상 화질 평가곽종길, 김현수, 김호성, 동경래, 신지윤, 최남길(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2019 · 제13권 제2호복부초음파 검사 시 탐촉자 압박에 따른 영상 화질 평가곽종길, 박신의, 최남길(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2018 · 제12권 제3호Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography for the Pancreas in Korea: A Preliminary Single Center Study문종호, 이태희, 장재영, 정승원, 조영덕, 조주영, 차상우, 최현종대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제2호복부 초음파검사에서 영상 점수 시스템 분류에 따른 간 섬유화 평가의 유용성안현, 이효영, 임인철, 지태정대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2019 · 제42권 제3호Feasibility of Newly Developed Endoscopic Ultrasound with Zone Sonography Technology for Diagnosis of Pancreatic DiseasesAkihiro Itoh, Daijiro Hayashi, Eizaburo Ohno, Hajime Sumi, Hidemi Goto, Hiroki Kawashima, Hiroyuki Sugimoto, Kohei Funasaka, Masanao Nakamura, Masatoshi Ishigami, Naoki Ohmiya, Ryoji Miyahara, Takeshi Hiramatsu, Yoshiaki Katano, Yoshiki Hirooka, Yosuke Nakamura, Yuya Itoh거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제4호초음파 영상에서 동적영역과 주파수 방식의 설정에 따른 효과강관석, 양정화, 이경성, 최민주, 팽동국대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2009 · 제32권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)