기계번역을 활용한 한영번역에서의 번역품질 비교연구
A Comparative Study on the Quality of Translation in Korean-English Translation Using Machine Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to suggest how to produce a better translation method in Korean-English machine translation. For this purpose, it compares translation error types and frequencies according to three machine translation methods; the pre-editing, post-editing and the combination of pre- and post-editing. In the experiment, 31 subjects are divided according to the TOEIC score and a selected translation method. The subjects are required to translate a 450-word report text through Papago, one of the machine translation tools and participate in the survey related to the reason for a selected translation method. The analysis shows subjects with the lower TOEIC scores below 600 select the pre-editing method while those with the higher TOEIC scores above 600 choose the post-editing and the combination of pre- and post-editing methods. It also indicates depending on a selected translation method, translation error types and frequencies are different. The better machine translations are produced by subjects who have higher TOEIC scores and choose the combination of pre- and post-editing method. This paper is meaningful in that the machine translation materials are analyzed and compared according to the three machine translation methods and the findings are utilized in translation and writing classes.
Abstract
This paper aims to suggest how to produce a better translation method in Korean-English machine translation. For this purpose, it compares translation error types and frequencies according to three machine translation methods; the pre-editing, post-editing and the combination of pre- and post-editing. In the experiment, 31 subjects are divided according to the TOEIC score and a selected translation method. The subjects are required to translate a 450-word report text through Papago, one of the machine translation tools and participate in the survey related to the reason for a selected translation method. The analysis shows subjects with the lower TOEIC scores below 600 select the pre-editing method while those with the higher TOEIC scores above 600 choose the post-editing and the combination of pre- and post-editing methods. It also indicates depending on a selected translation method, translation error types and frequencies are different. The better machine translations are produced by subjects who have higher TOEIC scores and choose the combination of pre- and post-editing method. This paper is meaningful in that the machine translation materials are analyzed and compared according to the three machine translation methods and the findings are utilized in translation and writing classes.
참고문헌 (17)
- 곽중철, "포스트에디팅 측정지표를 통한 기계번역 오류 유형화 연구", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.1~25 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 마승혜, "한영 기계번역 포스트 에디팅에 대한 경험적 고찰: 학부 교육 과정 및 결과를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.53~88 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 박옥수, "한영 기계 번역에서 ST의 유형적 특징에 따른 번역 오류 분석", 동아인문학, (41), pp.155~183 (2017), 동아인문학회
- 서보현, "기계번역 결과물의 오류유형 고찰", 번역학연구, 19(1), pp.99~117 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 신지선, "포스트에디팅 –최적의 협업 방식을 찾아서", KIGO 저널, 8, pp.38~53 (2017)
- 이상빈, "학부번역전공자의 기계번역 포스트에디팅, 무엇이 문제이고, 무엇을 가르쳐야 하는가?", 통역과 번역, 19(3), pp.37~64 (2017), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅에 관한 현상학 연구", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.117~143 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이성화, "영-한 및 한-영 기계번역 품질향상을 위한프리에디팅 기법 제안", 번역학연구, 19(5), pp.121~154 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "포스트에디팅 교육을 위한 포스트에디팅과 인간번역의 차이 연구", 통역과 번역, 20(1), pp.73~96 (2018), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 진용주, "프리에디팅(pre-editing)이 기계번역 품질에 미치는 영향 고찰: 유창성, 충실성, 가독성 비교를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 22(3), pp.27~64 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 한현희, "한노 기계번역의 오류 유형화 및 품질 개선을 위한 프리에디팅(pre-editing) 규칙 제안", 통번역학연구, 23(3), pp.291~327 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- Doherty, S., "Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translated Output : A User-Centered Study Using Eye-Tracking", International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, pp.40~51 (2014)
- Garcia, I., "Translating by post-editing : Is it the way forward?", Machine Translation, 5, pp.217~237 (2011)
- Gerlach, J., "Combining pre-editing and post-editing to improve statistical machine translation of user-generated content", Procedings of MT Summit XIV Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice, pp.45~53 (2013)
- Koponen, M., "Is machine translation post-editing worth the effort?", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, pp.131~148 (2016)
- Krings, P., "Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes" (2001), Kent State UP
- Vieira, N, "From Process to Product : Links between Post-editing Effort and Post-edited Quality, in Arnt Lykke Jakobsen and Bartolomé Mesa-Lao(eds)Translation in Transition", Amsterdam : John Benjamins, pp.161~186 (2017)