Adjunct Multiple Nominative Constructions and Form Sequence in Japanese and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to investigate adjunct MNCs in Japanese and Korean and to provide a uniform approach to them, following Goto and Ishii (2011) in part. In Japanese and Korean, the adjunct MNC has a fixed order among nominatives, forbidding nominatives to scramble. However, the constructions in the two languages are different with regard to coordination and idiom chunks. Considering the analogies and distinctions, I assume that the adjunct MNC uniformly results from Form Sequence (FSQ, Chomsky, 2020, 2021) in both languages, which produces an ordered set of elements. Nonetheless, the differences of both languages result from when the operation FSQ is applied in the adjunct MNC. Two nominatives undergo FSQ before they merge with the predicate in Japanese, but the argument nominative forms a set with the predicate and the set forms a sequence with the adjunct nominative in Korean.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate adjunct MNCs in Japanese and Korean and to provide a uniform approach to them, following Goto and Ishii (2011) in part. In Japanese and Korean, the adjunct MNC has a fixed order among nominatives, forbidding nominatives to scramble. However, the constructions in the two languages are different with regard to coordination and idiom chunks. Considering the analogies and distinctions, I assume that the adjunct MNC uniformly results from Form Sequence (FSQ, Chomsky, 2020, 2021) in both languages, which produces an ordered set of elements. Nonetheless, the differences of both languages result from when the operation FSQ is applied in the adjunct MNC. Two nominatives undergo FSQ before they merge with the predicate in Japanese, but the argument nominative forms a set with the predicate and the set forms a sequence with the adjunct nominative in Korean.
참고문헌 (19)
- Cho, S-Y, "The syntactic structure of some double nominative constructions in Korean", Linguistics, 7, pp.335~348 (1999)
- 최기용, "한국어 주격 중출 구문의 두 유형: 속격", 주격 교체의 경우, 2008, pp.33(4), 901~928[DOI]
- Chomsky, N, "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Beyond explanatory adequacy, "Chomsky, N.", MIT, ~, pp.No. 20 (2001)
- "Lecture at UCLA" (2019)[URL]
- "Lecture at the Linguistics Society of Japan" (2020)[URL]
- "Lecture at West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics" (2021)[URL]
- Chomsky, N., "Generative grammar and the faculty of language : Insights, questions, and challenges", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, pp.229~261 (2019)
- Chomsky, N., "Handbook of Mathematical Psychology", pp.269~322 (1963), Wiley
- Epstein, S. D., "A Minimalist Theory of Simplest Merge", pp.140~148 (2021), Routledge
- "Multiple nominative and Form Sequence: A new perspective to MERGE and Form Set" (2021)[URL]
- Kuroda, S. Y, "Issues in Japanese Linguistics", pp.229~272 (1987), De Gruyter
- Omune, J., "Reformulating pair-merge of heads", English Linguistics, 34(2), pp.266~301 (2018)
- Schütze, C. T., "INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case and licensing", Doctor, pp.1997
- Shim, J-Y., "In pursuit of an elegant theory: the minimalist program season 2" (2021), Bookk
- Tateishi, K., "The syntax of ‘subjects’", Doctor, pp.1991
- Ura, H., "Multiple feature-checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting", Doctor, pp.1995
- Yoon, J. H. S., "The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions", Japanese, 2009, pp.16, 64~83
- Vermeulen, R., "Possessive and adjunct multiple nominative constructions in Japanese", Lingua, 115(10), pp.1329~1363 (2005)