본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국 다문화주의의 역사적 배경

A Historical Background of American Multiculturalism

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

For a long time, America was regarded as a white men’s country. Even though native Americans and African Americans have resided as long as whites in the Unted States, they were not esteemed as fellow citizens by whites until the World War II. Through the World War II, the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement, racism , racial practices, and the national identity of the Unite States suffered great change. It was the beginning of multiculturalism in the United States. This article points three features of American multiculturalism. First, the most important driving force of American multiculturalism came from the civil rights movement. Therefore, the opposition of the American multicul - turalism is racism and Eurocentrism not assimilation. Integration and as - similation has been pursued by colored people as a way to be equal citizen with whites and a procedure to make a social and economic advancement. Historically, the assimilation has paved way for the multiculturalism in the United States. Second, American multiculturalism should be considered in the context of international society. The World War II and the Cold War stimulated white Americans to reflect their own racism. And a hostile foreign policy or a war against a specific country could be a barrier to the development of multi - culturalism which seek to friendly relationship among various groups with different racial/national or cultural backgrounds. Third, the social, economic, and cultural hegemony of white middle class has kept going on with the rising of multiculturalism discourses. The cen - trifugal power of multiculturalism developed with the strong centripetal force of white middle class. Multiculturalism has changed the norms and ideals relating with race in the United States. Multiculturalism has encouraged racial/national minorities and women to have more confidence and self-pride. But these histori - Homo Migrans Vol. 1 (Nov. 2009) 96 cal social background of multiculturalism is rarely mentioned and almost forgotten. As for the multiculturalism, it has different meanings accord - ing to the debaters. Some conservatives consider the multiculturalism as a kind of ethnocentrism that could be a harm to the unity of the country. Some radicals think that multiculturalsim hides the unequal situation and avoids to face the social and economic problems. These days, the most steady and ardent advocates are the corporations. With them, multiculturalism increasingly represents various life styles or tastes according to racial/national or gender difference, not social or economic inequality. The meaning of multiculturalism is changing, which is dependent on the racial relations, foreign policies, business marketing strategies, and international circumstances.

Abstract

For a long time, America was regarded as a white men’s country. Even though native Americans and African Americans have resided as long as whites in the Unted States, they were not esteemed as fellow citizens by whites until the World War II. Through the World War II, the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement, racism , racial practices, and the national identity of the Unite States suffered great change. It was the beginning of multiculturalism in the United States. This article points three features of American multiculturalism. First, the most important driving force of American multiculturalism came from the civil rights movement. Therefore, the opposition of the American multicul - turalism is racism and Eurocentrism not assimilation. Integration and as - similation has been pursued by colored people as a way to be equal citizen with whites and a procedure to make a social and economic advancement. Historically, the assimilation has paved way for the multiculturalism in the United States. Second, American multiculturalism should be considered in the context of international society. The World War II and the Cold War stimulated white Americans to reflect their own racism. And a hostile foreign policy or a war against a specific country could be a barrier to the development of multi - culturalism which seek to friendly relationship among various groups with different racial/national or cultural backgrounds. Third, the social, economic, and cultural hegemony of white middle class has kept going on with the rising of multiculturalism discourses. The cen - trifugal power of multiculturalism developed with the strong centripetal force of white middle class. Multiculturalism has changed the norms and ideals relating with race in the United States. Multiculturalism has encouraged racial/national minorities and women to have more confidence and self-pride. But these histori - Homo Migrans Vol. 1 (Nov. 2009) 96 cal social background of multiculturalism is rarely mentioned and almost forgotten. As for the multiculturalism, it has different meanings accord - ing to the debaters. Some conservatives consider the multiculturalism as a kind of ethnocentrism that could be a harm to the unity of the country. Some radicals think that multiculturalsim hides the unequal situation and avoids to face the social and economic problems. These days, the most steady and ardent advocates are the corporations. With them, multiculturalism increasingly represents various life styles or tastes according to racial/national or gender difference, not social or economic inequality. The meaning of multiculturalism is changing, which is dependent on the racial relations, foreign policies, business marketing strategies, and international circumstances.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Nathan Glazer, "우리는 이제 모두 다문화인이다" (2009), 미래를 소유한 사람들
  2. Charles Taylor, "Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition", pp.25~ (1994), Princeton University Press
  3. David Hollinger, "Postethnic America : Beyond Multiculturalism", pp.133~ (1995), Basic Books
  4. Dennis J. Downey, "From Americanization to Multiculturalism: Political Symbols and Struggles for Cultural Diversity in Twentieth-Century American Race Relations", Sociological Perspectives, 42, pp.255~ (1999)
  5. 박진빈, "백색국가건설사" (2006), 엘피
  6. Horace Kallen, "Culture and Democracy in the United States" (1970), Transaction Publshers
  7. Randolph Bourne, "Trans-national America", Atlantic Monthly, 118, pp.86~97 (1916)
  8. Stephan F. Brumberg, "Going to America, Going to School: The Jewish Immigrant Public School Encounter in Turn-of-the-Century New York City" (1986), Praeger Publishers
  9. Nathan Glazer, "Is Assimilation Dead?", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, pp.122~136 (1993)
  10. 황혜성, "다채로워진 미국 이민사 연구: ‘용광로’에서 탈 소수민족의식으로", 서양사론, (93) (2007)
  11. Mary L. Dudziak, "Josephine Baker, Racial Protest, and the Cold War", Journal of American History, 81, pp.543~570 (1994)
  12. Stokely Carmichael, "Black Power : The Politics of Liberation", pp.34~35 (1967), Vintage
  13. Malcolm X, "Malcolm X on Afro-American History", pp.3~ (1970), New York Publisher
  14. William L. Van Deburg, "New Day in Babylon: The Black Power Movement and American Culture, 1965-1975", pp.306~ (1992), University of Chicago Press
  15. Barack Obama, "내 아버지로부터의 꿈", pp.162~163 (2007), 랜덤하우스
  16. 김욱동, "다문화주의의 도전과 응전", 미국학논집, 30, pp.30~ (1998)
  17. Michael Katz, "The"Underclass"Debate" (1992), Princeton University Press
  18. Eric Foner, "The Story of American Freedom" (1998), W. W. Norton & Company
  19. Peter B. Levy, "The Legacy: Vietnam War in the American Imagination", pp.214~ (1990), Beacon Press
  20. Arthur M. Jr.. Schlesinger, "The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society" (1998), W. W. Norton & Compay
  21. Russelll Jacoby, "The Myth of Multiculturalism", New Left Review, 208, pp.121~126 (1994)
  22. Richard Alba, "Immigration and the American Realities of Assimilation and Multiculturalism", Sociological Forum, 14, pp.4~5 (1999)
  23. John Hignam, "Multiculturalism and Universalism: A History and Critique", American Quarterly, 45, pp.195~219 (1993)
  24. David Rieff, "Multiculturalism’s Silent Partner", Harper’s Magazine, 62~72 (1993)
  25. Chicago Cultural Studies Group, "Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader", pp.114~139 (1994), Wiley-Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)