본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공학설계와 공학글쓰기를 통합해서 가르치는 배경의 이해

Exploring the Background of Integrating Engineering Design and Technical Writing

권성규
한국교양교육학회 (The Korean Association of General Education)|2017.08|교양교육연구 (Korean Journal of General Education)|제11권 제4호|pp. 203-241

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

창의성creativity의사소통communicationengineering design공학설계conceptual design공학글쓰기개념 설계technical writing
주제분류학제간연구

초록

우리나라 공과대학들이 공학글쓰기를 가르친 지 꽤 오랜 시간이 지났지만, 학생들은 설계 의사소통을 위한 글을 제대로 쓰지 못하고, 공학설계 교육과정이 크게 달라진지 오래지만, 엔지니어들은 여전히 개념 설계가 미숙하다. 문헌 자료들을 연구하여, 공학설계와 공학글쓰기를 통합해서 가르치면 그런 문제가 해소될 수 있는 네 가지 이유를 기술하였다. 첫째, 빈틈없는 문제 정의가 발명의 바탕이 되고, 둘째, 언어 인공물이 발명을 지원하며, 셋째, 설계 언어 인공물들은 수사적 상황이 반영되게 작성되어야 하고, 넷째, 설계의 수사적 상황이 전문 주제에 대한 글쓰기 학습의 장이다. 이런 이유들을 근거로, 글쓰기 교육 전문가들과 공학 교수진이 협력해서 통합 과목이 개발되어야 한다.

Abstract

Although it has been a pretty long time since college of engineering has been teaching technical writing, engineering students are not good at writing for technical communication. Also, engineering design curriculum has been changed quite significantly more than a decade ago. However, it is said that engineering graduates are poor at developing creative design concepts. By studying research papers, four reasons to teach the subjects of both cornerstone design and technical writing in one course are to be discussed. The first, solid definition of design problem is the foundation for inventing solutions. Second, language artifacts aid the invention. Third, those language artifacts should be produced on the base of rhetorical situations. Lastly, rhetorical situations of design is a domain where technical writing could be effectively taught. With the understanding of these background, an integrated course of engineering design and technical communication could be developed.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 권성규, "기초설계와 공학글쓰기 연계 수업 사례", 교양교육연구, 11(1), pp.501~551 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
  2. 서울대학교 공과대학, "축적의 시간" (2015), 지식노마드
  3. 서울대학교 대학국어편찬위원회, "대학국어" (2009), 서울대학교출판문화원
  4. 원진숙, "장르 기반 환경적 쓰기 교수.학습 모형 개발 연구", 한국초등교육, 22(2), pp.147~165 (2011), 초등교육연구원
  5. 임지룡, "의미작용과 기호작용의 통합", 현대문법연구, 18, pp.129~146 (1999)
  6. 정희모, "대학 글쓰기 교육에서학습 전이의 문제와 교수 전략", 국어교육, (146), pp.199~224 (2014), 한국어교육학회
  7. 한성우, "공학 글쓰기 교육, 누가 할 것인가?", Ingenium, 24(1), pp.39~41 (2017)
  8. Bawarshi, Anis, "Genre & the Invention of the Writer: Reconsidering the Place of Invention in Composition" (2003), Utah State University Press
  9. Bucciarelli, Louis L., "Between thought and object in engineering design", Design Studies, 23(3), pp.219~231 (2002)
  10. Buchanan, Richard, "Wicked Problems in Design Thinking", Design Issues, 8(2), pp.5~21 (1992)
  11. Burnett, Rebecca E., "Technical Communication" (2001), Harcourt College Publishers
  12. Carter, Michael, "Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines", College Composition and Communication, 58(3), pp.385~418 (2007)
  13. Conrad, Susan, "A Comparison of Practitioner and Student Writing in Civil Engineering", Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), pp.191~217 (2017)
  14. Dean, Deborah, "Genre Theory: Teaching, Writing, and Being" (2008), National Council of Teachers of English
  15. Dixon, John R., "Design Engineering: Inventiveness, Analysis, and Decision Making" (1966), McGraw-Hill Book Company
  16. Douglas, D. M., "Writing in the Engineering Design Lab: Integrating Communication Skills into the Engineering Curriculum" (2011), Queen’s University
  17. Dym, Clive L., "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning", Journal of Engineering Education, pp.103~120 (2005)
  18. Gnanapragasam, N., "Evolution of Technical Writing in Senior Design-A Case History", Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), pp.F1~F60 (2010)
  19. Grose, Thomas K., "You Know It. Can You Write It?", ASEE Prism, American Society of Engineering Education, 42~45 (2007)
  20. Hadjiyanni, T., "Writing in Design Thinking - Deconstructing the Question of Being", International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(1), pp.116~127 (2013)
  21. Hanson, James H., "Using Writing Assignments to Improve Self-Assessment and Communication Skills in an Engineering Statics Course", Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), pp.515~529 (2008)
  22. Harris, Jeanette, "Strategies for College Writing: Sentences, Paragraphs, Essays" (2000), Allyn and Bacon
  23. Heylen, C., "A technical writing programme implemented in a first-year engineering course at KU Leuven", European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(6), pp.595~607 (2013)
  24. Hirsch, P. L., "Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration", International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4), pp.342~348 (2001)
  25. Johnson-Sheehan, Richard, "Technical Communication Today" (2010), Longman
  26. Karsnitz, John R., "Engineering Design: An Introduction" (2009), Delmar Cengage Learning
  27. Kimbell, Lucy, "Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II", The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 4(2), pp.129~148 (2012)
  28. Kirszner, Laurie G., "Patterns for College Writing: A Rhetorical reader and Guide", pp.2010, Bedford
  29. Leverenz, Carrie S., "Design Thinking and the Wicked problem of Teaching Writing", Computers and Composition, 33, pp.1~12 (2014)
  30. Lewis, Barbara, "Talking to Texts and Sketches : The Function of Written and Graphic Mediation in Engineering Design", Business Communication Quarterly, 63(2), pp.110~116 (2000)
  31. Marback, Richard, "Embracing wicked Problems : The Turn to Design in Composition Studies", College Composition and Communication, 61(2), pp.397~419 (2009)
  32. Murray, Donald M., "A Writer Teaches Writing" (2004), Heinel Cengage Learning
  33. Norton, Robert L., "Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery, Second Edition in SI Units" (2013), McGraw-Hill
  34. Paretti, Marie C., "Teaching Communication in Capstone Design : The Role of the Instructor in Situated Learning", Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), pp.491~503 (2008)
  35. Purdy, James P., "What Can Design Thinking Offer Writing Studies", College Composition and Communication, 65(4), pp.397~419 (2014)
  36. Riddell, William T., "Making Communication Matter : Integrating Instruction, Projects and Assignments to Teach Writing and Design", Advances in Engineering Education, 2(2), pp.1~31 (2010)
  37. Sheppard, Sheri, "Freshman Engineering Design Experiences : an Organizational Framework", International Journal of Engineering Education, 13(3), pp.190~197 (1997)
  38. Sonnenwald, Diane H., "Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process", Design Studies, 17, pp.277~301 (1996)
  39. Thompson, Mary Kathryn, "Green Design in Cornerstone Courses at KAIST : Theory and Practice", International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), pp.359~365 (2010)
  40. Waytz, Adam, "The Limits of Empathy", Harvard Business Review, pp.69~74 (2016)
  41. Winsor, Dorothy A., "Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  42. Yalvac, B., "Promoting Advanced Writing Skills in an Upper-Level Engineering Class", Journal of Engineering Education, pp.117~128 (2007)
  43. Yarnoff C,, "Engineering Design and Communication: Principles and Practice" (2010), Northwestern University

관련 논문AI추천

공학글쓰기와 공학 기초설계의 통합권성규한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2019 · 제22권 제4호기초설계와 공학글쓰기 연계 수업 사례권성규한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2017 · 제11권 제1호공학설계에서 협동 글쓰기 가르치기권성규한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2014 · 제17권 제1호공학글쓰기 이해권성규한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2015 · 제9권 제2호공대생 글쓰기 과목에서 가르칠 내용권성규한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2010 · 제13권 제1호과학기술자를 위한 글쓰기 교육의 새로운 방향신선경한국작문학회 · 작문연구2008 · 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

대학 교양교육과정을 위한 역량의 재개념화－Sen의 잠재가능성 접근과 Vallance의 다양한 앎을 중심으로허영주pp. 11-39교양 사회과학에서 민주적 시민성 함양을 위한 체험과 협력 기반 교육 방법 －‘사회적 약자’에 대한 체험교육 사례를 중심으로박현희pp. 41-80창의성 및 윤리 교육을 위한 폴 틸리히의 존재론 적용 － 숭실대학교 기독교교양교육 사례를 중심으로성신형pp. 81-105서평 교육 이론 정립을 위한 연구구자황pp. 107-137교양 문학 수업 사례 연구－ 피드백 기반 조별 발표가 탐구공동체(CoI)에 미치는 영향Shashi Kumar Mishra, 김도훈, 박정이pp. 141-173
원문 보기