濯纓 金馹孫의 伸冤과 追尊
Posthumous Vindication and Celebration of Takyeong Kim Il-son
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본고는 탁영 김일손의 죄과, 신원, 추존 양상을 검토하기 위해 작성되었다. 김일손이 쓴 사초에 대한 신뢰성을 약화시키기 위해 사초 관련자들에 대한 심문과 진술을 확보하였으며, 김종직의 弔義帝文과 이를 ‘忠憤’의 발로로 보는 판단이 김일손의 죄목을 구성하는 결정적 근거였다. 이후 김일손의 복권은 사화 발생의 본질이 붕당과 능상에 있는 것이 아니라 사적 원한과 사초열람의 원칙 붕괴에 있었다는 논의의 전개로 가능했는데, 이러한 변화는 유자광의 정치적 몰락에 연유하였다. 당시 김일손의 복권은 개인이 아닌 사관의 역할에 대한 복권이었으며, 공론 정치의 부활을 상징하는 것이었다. 복권 이후 김일손에 대한 추증 및 증시, 묘역 조성, 서원배향, 문집간행 등의 추존 작업은 조선 중기이후 중앙과 지역의 사림, 김일손 가문의 정치적 관계망 속에서 이루어졌다.
Abstract
This study examines the process of posthumously vindicating and celebrating the life of Kim Il-son who died during the Muosahwa. This vindication and celebration of Kim Il-son’s life were not made by individual or by the actions of family members, but were led by a memorial community that sympathized with his death. First, the study looked into Kim Il-son's death and the injustice surrounding it, centering around Muosahwa and Jungjong-banjeong. The reason that Kim Il-son was sentenced to be executed was the great crime against Yeonsan-gun which was his praise of Kim Jong-jik and reproach of King Sejo by including Kim Jong-jik's Joui-jemun in the Sacho. As a result, not only did Kim Il-son suffer, but Kim Jong-jik's literary group, Sarim, was devastated as well. After a while, the Jungjong-banjeong took place, and in the process of liquidating the political heritage of the Yeonsan-gun era, the injustice of the people who had suffered during Muo-sahwa was redressed. In this process, Kim Il-son's perception of the Sacho was summarized as a private matter of personal resentment between Kim Il-son and Lee Guk-don that had gone the extreme, rather than Sejo’s usurpation of the throne, and his descendant's succession. It could be understood that he had conducted his duty as a historiographer called Sagwan. Kim Il-son's political rehabilitation proceeded with Yoo Ja-kwang's political decline. Second, the study reviewed the follow-up activities of Sarim and the descendants of Kim Il-son by dividing them into the posthumous conferment of honors, posthumous title, graveyard construction, Seowon in memory of him (Confucian shrine-academy), and anthology publication. The posthumous celebration of Kim Il-son was made not only by the efforts of the Kim Il-son family, but was also completed by the political network of the royal court, central and local Sarim, and Kim Il-son family after the Mid-Joseon Dynasty. In the first place, the lost honor due to the controversial death of Kim Il-son could have been reinstated through the posthumous title and conferment of honors based on the efforts of the central and local Sarim, the succession of Kim Il-son, and the descendants of Kim Jong-jik family and Kim Il-son family. In addition, Kim Il-son's current grave is set up in Cheongdo after the grave had been moved three times, and was selected as the grave of Chunghyeon and built during the reign of King Seonjo. The tombstone was also built by the local government of Cheongdo, the scholars of the village, as well as the national and local communities participated in commemorating him. The Jagye Seowon for Kim Il-son became a private Seowon with the help of Noron Song Joon-gil in cooperation with the family and local people. In addition, the publication of Kim Il-son's writings was a result of the efforts and enthusiasm of the descendants of the Kim Il-son family and was fully supported materially by the government. As above, vindicating the legacy of Kim Il-son was possible with the Jungjong-banjeong, and the follow-up activities for the posthumous celebration were prominent in the King Jungjong, Seonjo, Hyeonjong, and the Reign of King Hyunjong, when the priesthood, which placed the importance of the harmony of the kingship and the priesthood, was superior to the period of a singularly strong kingship. The vindication of Kim Il-son and the posthumous celebration of Kim Il-son were carried out in a time when the priesthood was able to exert power.
참고문헌 (36)
- "山君日記", ~
- "中宗實錄", ~
- "宣祖實錄", ~
- "顯宗實錄", ~
- "純祖實錄", ~
- "國朝寶鑑", ~
- "大典會通", ~
- "大明律直解", ~
- "大明律附例箋釋", ~
- "大明律集解附例", ~
- 尹鳳朝, "圃巖集"
- 尹鳳九, "屛溪集"
- 金馹孫, "濯纓集", 한국고전번역원, 국사편찬위원회 데이터베이스
- "탁영 김일손의 문학과 사상" (1998), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
- 金濬, "(國譯)濯纓先生文集" (1994), 뿌리출판사
- 김학곤, "탁영선생문집" (2012), 탁영선생숭모사업회
- 계승범, "중종의 시대: 조선의 유교화와 사림운동" (2014), 역사비평사
- 김광순, "탁영 김일손의 문학과 사상" (1998), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
- 김 돈, "조선전기 군신권력관계 연구" (1997), 서울대학교 출판부
- 김범, "사화와 반정의 시대 - 성종, 연산군, 중종과 그 신하들" (2007), 역사비평사
- 김 범, "연산군: 그 인간과 시대의 내면" (2010), 글항아리
- 이훈상, "조선왕조 사회의 성취와 귀속" (2007), 일조각
- 이병휴, "조선전기 사림파의 현실인식과 대응" (1999), 일조각
- 이종범, "사림열전 2 -순례자의 노래" (2008), 아침이슬
- 정경주, "성종조 신진사류의 문학세계" (1993), 법인문화사
- 탁영 김일손 선비의 길을 묻다, 탁영 김일손 문중 소장유물조사 학술용역 보고서, "청도박물관", 청도박물관, ~ (2019)
- 김영두, "亂言과 隱居, 세조 정권에 저항하는 대항 기억의 형성", 사학연구, (112), pp.157~204 (2013), 한국사학회
- 김영두, "고종 11년(1874) 濯纓先生年譜 간행의 의미-자료의 진위 문제에 대한 검토를 중심으로-", 사학연구, (127), pp.397~440 (2017), 한국사학회
- 김윤곤, "탁영 김일손의 현실의식과 그 대응", 조선사연구, 15, pp.1~30 (2006)
- 김정신, "戊午士禍를 둘러싼 정치론의 갈등과 그 성격", 한국사연구, (168), pp.57~94 (2015), 한국사연구회
- 박미선, "18세기 鄕班家의 묘비 건립 활동과 그 함의 - 고흥 여산송씨 가문을 중심으로 -", 남도문화연구, (38), pp.173~211 (2019), 남도문화연구소[DOI]
- 박 주, "김일손의 생애와 무오사화", 조선사연구, 12, pp.107~122 (2003)
- 신병주, "김일손: 결코 흔들림 없는 직필정신", 선비문화, 2, pp.17~24 (2004)
- 에드워드 와그너, "정치사적 입장에서 본 조선 사화의 성격", 역사학보, 85, pp.128~130 (1980)
- 조항덕, "濯纓 金馹孫과 道東書院", 漢文古典硏究, 24(1), pp.103~142 (2012), 한국한문고전학회[DOI]
- 진상원, "조선왕조 정치범의 신원과 추존 문화", 박사, 사학, pp.2007
