토착화신학의 모델들에 대한 비판적 고찰: 불이모델을 향하여
A Critical Study on the Models of Korean Indigenous Theology
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 글에서는20세기에 이루어진 한국문화와 복음의 관계성에 대한 모델, 윤성범의 파종모델, 박봉배의 발효모델, 박종천의 접목모델을 비판적으로 고찰하면서21세기 다문화 한국사회에 적합한 새로운 모델의 방향을 모색하여 보려고 한다. 그러나 본 글에서는 윤성범,박봉배, 박종천의 토착화 신학을 전체적으로 고찰하기보다는 이들이 제시하는 복음과 문화의 모델에만 집중하려고 한다.
Abstract
The first purpose of this article is to consider and criticize the models of Gospel and Korean culture in Korean indigenous theology,and the second purpose is to seek a new model in the situation of 21century. The first part of this article will examine three models, sowing models, fermentative model, and grafting model. The sowing model was developed by Sungbum Yoon, and grounded the parable of seed and soil. And this model focuses on the soil, Korean culture before the contact between Gospel and Korean culture. It tries to make a good soil (Korean culture) because seed, Gospel can be changed by soil, Korean culture. The model of fermentation focuses on the contacting point between Gospel and Korean culture, and transformative aspect by Gospel. This model seeks to change the negative aspect of Korean culture by Gospel. However, the grafting model suggests that Korean culture should be reconsidered before meeting with Gospel because Korean Minjung were suffered in the Korean history. Of course, Gospel should be reconsidered because there is the imperial aspect in Western Christianity, which delivered Gospel to Korea. Therefore, the grafting model presupposes ‘double cutting.’As a result, the three models do not embrace Korean aspect after the contact between Gospel and Korean culture. In the 21st century, there are many young Christians in Korea who were born, and grown in Christian culture. They feel comfortable in Christian concept and culture rather than Korean traditional concept and culture. Even tough the first generation of Korean indigenous theology like Yoon Sungbum tried to explain Christian concept through Korean concept, young Christians tries to Korean traditional concept through Christian concept. This means that Korean theology should understand the relationship between Gospel and Korean culture from the non-dualist perspective rather than monistic or dualistic. Therefore, this article suggests that non-dualistic model in the relationship between Gospel and Korean culture in situation of 21st.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김광식, "토착화와 해석학" (1989), 대한기독교서회
- 김경재, "해석학과 종교신학" (1994), 한국신학연구소
- 박봉배, "기독교윤리와 한국문화" (1983), 성광문화사
- 박종천, "기어가시는 하느님" (1995), 도서출판 감신
- 박종천, "상생의 신학" (1991), 한국신학연구소
- 샐리 맥페이그, "어머니, 연인, 친구" (2006), 뜰밖
- 서중석, "복음서해석" (1991), 대한기독교서회
- 유동식, "풍류도와 한국신학" (1992), 전망사
- 유동식, "한국신학의 광맥" (1982), 전망사
- 윤성범, "한국적 신학" (1972), 조명문화사
- 윤성범전집 편집위원회, "한국종교문화와 한국적 기독교" (1998), 도서출판 감신
- 윤성범전집 편집위원회, "효와 종교" (1998), 도서출판 감신
- 이찬석, "탈식민지론과 아시아 신학- 피에리스와 호미바바를 중심으로-", 신학사상, (141), pp.79~112 (2008), 한국신학연구소
- 한국문화신학회, "한국문화와 풍류신학" (2002), 한들출판사
- Lee, Jung young, "The Trinity in Asia Perspective" (1996), Abingdon Press
