1960년대 초 혁명과 역사적 전환기 사회적 실존의 문제 - 한국 영화에 재현된 서민의 애환과 세대의 가치를 중심으로-
Revolutions in Early 1960s and Issue of Social Existence in Historical Turning Point ‐ Focusing on Joys and Sorrows of Public and Value of Generation Reproduced in Korean Movies ‐
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article tried to interpret the problem of social existence of people who live their lives in early 1960s, from the perspective of ‘death’, ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ reproduced in Korean movies, assuming it as historical transition period with two revolutions, although paying attention to joy and sorrow of people. It was tried to confirm that that ‘death’ was directly related with social existence that people had to endure through the reproduction of conflicts between modern and pre‐modern, economic survival, and conflicts and reconciliation between generations through ‘death’ in movies. This ‘death’ is not interpreted as negative meaning only such as termination or finishing. It becomes actively included in the positivity of life by meaning new restart. Death reflecting joy, sorrow and anxiety of public becomes the ground composing the philosophy of ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ emerging in 1960s. To people living in the currents of 1960s, crisis like ‘death’ came but it did not terminate everything but make new philosophy of ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ emerged to overcome it. ‘Conduct of life’ is converged to the theory of vocation and makes a theory that we should be faithful to the given job within the fence of family rather than pursue wealth, fame or social recognition. Humble vocation theory based on ethical values such as ‘Honesty’ and ‘Faithfulness’ can be seen as philosophy of ‘Conduct of Life’. In movies it is reproduced that they would acquire ‘money’ naturally and as if it were the only way to stability and happiness of life. Family movies reproducing these values occupied stable position by succeeding in being a box‐office hit and getting its artistic value recognized. Of course, value of generation reproduced in family movies has limitations in that it pursued the happiness of self and contributed to self‐protection and composition of conservative values. It should not be overlooked that these values could be the meeting points with economic modernization policy that the ruling group wanted to achieve through revolutions. However, it should be noted that family movies are not the reproduction of specific ideologies that two revolutions had brought but the reflection of values that public wanted to go for while they were experiencing revolutions.
Abstract
The article tried to interpret the problem of social existence of people who live their lives in early 1960s, from the perspective of ‘death’, ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ reproduced in Korean movies, assuming it as historical transition period with two revolutions, although paying attention to joy and sorrow of people. It was tried to confirm that that ‘death’ was directly related with social existence that people had to endure through the reproduction of conflicts between modern and pre‐modern, economic survival, and conflicts and reconciliation between generations through ‘death’ in movies. This ‘death’ is not interpreted as negative meaning only such as termination or finishing. It becomes actively included in the positivity of life by meaning new restart. Death reflecting joy, sorrow and anxiety of public becomes the ground composing the philosophy of ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ emerging in 1960s. To people living in the currents of 1960s, crisis like ‘death’ came but it did not terminate everything but make new philosophy of ‘money’ and ‘conduct of life’ emerged to overcome it. ‘Conduct of life’ is converged to the theory of vocation and makes a theory that we should be faithful to the given job within the fence of family rather than pursue wealth, fame or social recognition. Humble vocation theory based on ethical values such as ‘Honesty’ and ‘Faithfulness’ can be seen as philosophy of ‘Conduct of Life’. In movies it is reproduced that they would acquire ‘money’ naturally and as if it were the only way to stability and happiness of life. Family movies reproducing these values occupied stable position by succeeding in being a box‐office hit and getting its artistic value recognized. Of course, value of generation reproduced in family movies has limitations in that it pursued the happiness of self and contributed to self‐protection and composition of conservative values. It should not be overlooked that these values could be the meeting points with economic modernization policy that the ruling group wanted to achieve through revolutions. However, it should be noted that family movies are not the reproduction of specific ideologies that two revolutions had brought but the reflection of values that public wanted to go for while they were experiencing revolutions.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강대진, "마부", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1960)
- 강대진, "박서방", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1960)
- 김기영, "하녀", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1960)
- 박성복, "해바라기 가족", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1961)
- 신상옥, "로맨스빠빠", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1960)
- 유현목, "오발탄", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1961)
- 이봉래, "삼등과장", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1961)
- 이봉래, "월급쟁이", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1962)
- 이형표, "서울의 지붕 밑", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1961)
- 한형모, "골목 안 풍경", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1962)
- 한형모, "돼지꿈", 한국영상자료원, ~ (1961)
- 강내희, "4.19세대의 회고와 반성", 문화과학, 62(여름), pp.156~ (2010), 문화과학사
- 김선아, "근대의 시간, 국가의 시간: 1960년대 한국영화, 젠더 그리고 국가권력 담론, In 한국영화와 근대성" (2005), 소도
- 노지승, "영화, 정치와 시대성의 징후, 도시 중간계층의 욕망과 가족", 역사문제연구, 15(1), pp.159~192 (2011), 역사문제연구소
- 박지연, "영화법 제정에서 제4차 개정기까지의 영화정책(1961~1984), In 한국영화정책사" (2005), 나남출판
- 이상록, "경제제일주의의 사회적 구성과 ‘생산적 주체’ 만들기 ― 4·19~5·16시기 혁명의 전유를 둘러싼 경합과 전략들", 역사문제연구, 15(1), pp.115~158 (2011), 역사문제연구소
- 이영일, "한국영화전사", pp.263~ (2004), 소도
- 이우석, "광복에서 1960년까지의 영화정책(1945~1960), In 한국영화정책사" (2005), 나남출판
- 이임하, "상이군인, 국민 만들기", 중앙사론, (33), pp.297~323 (2011), 중앙사학연구소
- 변재란, "멜로드라마", pp.146~147 (2011), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 조준형, "1960년대 초 정변기 한국영화 연구", 박사, pp.2011
- 천정환, "처세ㆍ교양ㆍ실존 1960년대의 ‘자기계발’과 문학문화", 민족문학사연구, (40), pp.92~134 (2009), 민족문학사학회
- "국내의 움직임 신생활운동과 위정자의 각성", 사상계, pp.157~159 (1960)
- 권순영, "범죄예방책의 과학화-범죄와 세상", 사상계 (1958)
- "시민의 45.8%가 집이 없다-요원한 서울의 주택난 해결", 사상계, pp.192~193 (1962)
- "신영화 <돈>", 서울신문, 4~ (1958)
- "「【신영화】미수(未遂)했으나 주목할 실험 김기영 감독의 하녀", 동아일보, 4~ (1960)
- "【신영화】 소시민적인 인정희극 이봉래 감독의 월급쟁이", 한국일보, 4~ (1962)
- "【신영화】풍자로 카버한 비속성 이봉래 감독 <마이동풍>", 동아일보, 4~ (1961)
- "실존주의의 몰락", 사상계, 133~ (1955)
- "새영화 즐길 수 있는 드라마 박종호 감독 골목 안 풍경", 서울신문, 4~ (1962)
- "새영화】참신한 연출 역량 골목 안 풍경", 경향신문, 4~ (1962)
- "【새영화】통쾌한 풍자정신 이봉래 감독 월급장이", 서울신문, 4~ (1962)
- "어제(語題)의 스타 김승호", 서울신문, 4~ (1961)
- "【연예】영화계의 하한기 결산", 서울신문, 4~ (1962)
- "【영화장평】<박서방> 원작 못 살린 안이한 연출", 조선일보, 4~ (1960)
- "우리가 본 영화", 동아일보, 4~ (1961)
- 유석진, "신세대와 구세대 간의 알력", 사상계, 4, pp.106~ (1961)
- "60년의 영화계", 동아일보, 4~ (1960)
- "지평선", 한국일보, 1~ (1961)
- "제명으로 한몫? 이감독과 <월급장이>", 서울신문, 4~ (1962)
- "【좌담회】신생활운동의 요령", 사상계, pp.218~ (1960)
- "【특집 서민의 경제학】서울 시민은 어떻게 사나", 사상계, pp.162~ (1962)
- 허백년, "1960년 영화회고", 한국일보, 4~ (1960)
- 황영빈, "영화제 출품과 나의 의견 <돈>의 레알리즘을 이태리 것과 비교한다", 한국일보, 8~ (1958)
