초등 과학 교수법 강좌를 통한 예비교사들의 과학창의성에 대한 개념 및 교수 효능감 변화
Changes in Conceptions and Teaching Efficacy for Scientific Creativity in Preservice Teachers through a Elementary Science Methods Course
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 ‘초등과학교육의 실제’ 강좌를 통해 초등 예비 교사들의 과학창의성에 대한 개념과교수효능감이 얼마나 어떻게 변화하였는가를 조사하였다. 이 강좌는 초등과학 교수학습과 관련된 이론적 내용, 창의성, 초등 과학 교육과정 생명 영역의 단원 내용 분석 ․ 재구성 ․ 수업시연으로 구성하여진행하였다. 독창성과 유용성이라는 창의성의 두 가지 핵심 요소, 창의성을 발휘하는 영역, 창의성을발휘하는 주체의 수준이라는 세 가지 요소를 반영하여, ‘초등과학창의성’을 ‘초등학생 수준에서 과학적으로 새롭고 유용한 것을 만들어내는 능력’으로 정의하였다. 강좌 수강 전에는 대부분의 학생이 과학창의성에 대해 독창성 편향을 갖는 부분적 이해를 하고 있었고, 수강 후에는 61.1%의 학생이 올바른개념을 갖게 되었다. 초등학교에서 과학창의성을 가르칠 수 있는 자신감 정도를 묻는 초등과학창의성교수효능감에 대해 100점 만점 기준으로 수강 전에는 38.1점에서 수강 후에는 73.4점으로 통계적으로 유의하게 향상되었다. 이렇게 향상된 과정과 이유를 분석하고, 이를 토대로 초등 예비 교사를 대상으로 하는 과학창의성 교육의 함의들을 논의한다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the concepts and teaching efficacy for scientific creativity in preservice teachers change through a Elementary Science Methods course. The course was consisted of theoretical content related to elementary science teaching and learning, creativity, analyzing, reconstructing, and demonstrating lesson contents of life domain of national elementary science curriculum. Reflecting the three major elements of creativity, that is, the two essential components of creativity, the area of creativity expression, and the level of creativity, the 'elementary science creativity' was defined as 'the ability to make novel and useful things in science area at elementary school level'. Before the course, most students had a partial understanding of originalitybias about scientific creativity, and 61.1% of the students got the right idea after taking the course. On the question about teaching efficacy in elementary science defined as the degree of confidence in being able to teach scientific creativity in elementary school, the statistically significant improvement from 38.1 points before the course to 73.4 points after the course was appeared. I analyzed the processes and reasons for this improvement and discuss the implications of teaching scientific creativity for elementary preservice teachers.
참고문헌 (48)
- 교육부, "2015개정 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호", ~ (2015)
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.990~1010 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발", 생물교육, 40(4), pp.429~452 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
- 임채성, "과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용", 초등과학교육, 33(2), pp.242~257 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 임채성, "초등과학창의성의 정의 ․ 실제 ․ 평가", 한국초등과학교육학회 제69차 하계학술대회: 창의적인초등 교사를 위한 과학교육(기조강연 A) (2015)
- 창의성 계발교육 실태분석 및 전략 구안, "한국교육개발원", 한국교육개발원, ~ (2001)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Project 2061: Science for All Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Aguirre, J., "Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, pp.327~356 (2000)
- Albion, P., "Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students", Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, pp.321~347 (2001)
- Alexander, P. A., "Domain knowledge : Evolving themes and emerging concerns", Educational Psychology, 27, pp.33~51 (1992)
- Aljughaiman, A., "Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students", The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), pp.17~34 (2007)
- Amabile, T. M., "Frontiers of creativity research:beyond the basics", pp.223~254 (1987), Bearly
- Ashton, P. T., "Making a Difference: Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement" (1986), Longman
- Baer, J., "Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-specific Approach" (1993), Erlbaum
- Beghetto, R. A., "The Cambridge handbook of creativity", pp.447~466 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Bjerstedt, A., "Explorations in creativity", pp.1976, LiberLaromedel
- Borko, H., "Professional development in education: New paradigm and practices", pp.35~65 (1995), Teachers College Press
- Craft, A., "Creativity and Early Years Education" (2002), Continuum
- DasGupta, S., "Creativity in Invention and Design - Computational and Cognitive Explorations of Technological Originality" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Davies, D, "How do trainee primary teachers understand creativity?", Creativity and innovation – DATA International Research Conference (2004)
- Diakidoy, I-A. N., "Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity", British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), pp.225~243 (1999)
- Dickinson, V. L., "Changing elementary teachers’ views of the NOS: Effective strategies for science method courses", ERIC Document Reproduction Service No:ED 441 680, ~ (2000)
- Fisher, R., "Teaching Children to Think" (1990), Simon & Schuster
- Fryer, M., "Teachers’ views about creativity", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, pp.207~219 (1991)
- Garner, R., "Schools ‘must do more for creativity’", The Independent, 31 Oct. 2007, ~ (2007)
- Kaufman, J. C., "Sure, I’m creative - But not in mathematics! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains", Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, pp.143~155 (2004)
- Kaufman, J. C., "Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Kaufman, J. C., "Beyond big and little : The four c model of creativity", Review of General Psychology, 13(1), pp.1~12 (2009)
- Kaufman, J. C., "Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), pp.229~236 (2013)
- Kind, P. M., "Creativity in science education : Perspectives and challenges for developing school science", Studies in Science Education, 43, pp.1~37 (2007)
- Milne, I., "Children’s science", Primary Science Review, 100, pp.33~34 (2007)
- Newton, L., "Creative thinking and teaching for creativity in elementary school science", Gifted and Talented International, 25, pp.111~124 (2010)
- O'Carroll, A., "Working Time, Knowledge Work and Post-industrial Society: Unpredictable Work" (2015), Springer
- Park, S., "Changes in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), pp.37~64 (2006)
- Plucker, J. A., "Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research", Educational Psychologist, 39, pp.83~96 (2004)
- Ritchie, S. M., "Creative thinking instruction for aboriginal children", Learning and Instruction, 6(1), pp.59~75 (1996)
- Runco, M. A., "Creativity", Annual Review of Psychology, 55, pp.657~687 (2004)
- Runco, M. A., "Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity : a cross cultural perspective", Creativity Research Journal, 14, pp.427~438 (2002)
- Schwartz-Geschka, M., "Creativity in Japanese society", Creativity and Innovation Management, 3(4), pp.229~232 (1994)
- Simonton, D. K., "Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior : The integration of product, person, and process perspectives", Psychological Bulletin, 129, pp.475~494 (2003)
- Sternberg, R. J, "Handbook of human creativity" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Sternberg, R. J., "Creativity: From Potential to Realization" (2004), APA
- Swars, S. L., "Changes in teaching efficacy during a professional development school‐Based science methods course", School Science and Mathematics, 110(4), pp.193~202 (2010)
- Tan, A-G., "A review of the study of creativity in Singapore", Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(4), pp.259~284 (2000)
- Weisberg, R. W., "Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius" (1992), Freeman
- Yeh, Y. C., "The interactive influences of three ecological systems on R & D personnel’s technological creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), pp.11~25 (2004)
- Yeh, Y. C., "Knowledge management in blended learning : Effects on professional development in creativity instruction", Computers & Education, 56(1), pp.146~156 (2011)
- Yeh, Y. C., "The cognitive processes of pupils’ technological creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 18, pp.213~227 (2006)