Language Situation in Post‐soviet Kyiv: Surzhyk as sociolinguistic phenomenon and its perception by Kyivites
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on the language situation in the capital of Ukraine, Kyiv, twenty years after the country has become independent. It concentrates on perception of Russian and Ukrainian languages by Kyivites and makes special accent on their perception of such sociolinguistic phenomena as surzhyk. Through looking at the roots of surzhyk in Ukraine and using the data gathered through detailed survey conducted in Kyiv this paper distinguishes major tendencies among educated Kyivites in their perception of current language situation in Ukraine as well as their understanding and perception of surzhyk. Attention is focused on how linguists and common people understand surzhyk, and whether their approaches coincide. Also, the paper analyzes how Kyivites percept the situation of bilingualism that still exists in Kyiv even after twenty years of country’s independence and what their desires for future generations are from the point of view of language. The paper shows that despite the fact that after twenty years of independence the Ukrainian language still strives for taking its niche as the commonly spoken language in Ukraine, many Ukrainians (specifically Kyivites on whom this research concentrates) see it as a language of the future which can been clearly seen from their desire that their children speak the language. Moreover, the survey finds that Ukrainians strive for their language to be pure and correct which reveals itself from their perception and evaluation of surzhyk as impure language of poorly educated people.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the language situation in the capital of Ukraine, Kyiv, twenty years after the country has become independent. It concentrates on perception of Russian and Ukrainian languages by Kyivites and makes special accent on their perception of such sociolinguistic phenomena as surzhyk. Through looking at the roots of surzhyk in Ukraine and using the data gathered through detailed survey conducted in Kyiv this paper distinguishes major tendencies among educated Kyivites in their perception of current language situation in Ukraine as well as their understanding and perception of surzhyk. Attention is focused on how linguists and common people understand surzhyk, and whether their approaches coincide. Also, the paper analyzes how Kyivites percept the situation of bilingualism that still exists in Kyiv even after twenty years of country’s independence and what their desires for future generations are from the point of view of language. The paper shows that despite the fact that after twenty years of independence the Ukrainian language still strives for taking its niche as the commonly spoken language in Ukraine, many Ukrainians (specifically Kyivites on whom this research concentrates) see it as a language of the future which can been clearly seen from their desire that their children speak the language. Moreover, the survey finds that Ukrainians strive for their language to be pure and correct which reveals itself from their perception and evaluation of surzhyk as impure language of poorly educated people.
참고문헌 (20)
- Azhniuk, Bohdan, "Movna yednist natsii:diaspora i Ukraina" (1999), Ridna mova
- Besters‐Dil'ger, Juliane, "Project INTAS: Movna polityka ta movna sytuacija v Ukraini: analiz i rekomendacii" (2010), Kyyevo‐Mohylyanska academia
- Bilaniuk,Laada, "Contested Tongues: Language Politics and Cultural Correction in Ukraine" (2006), Cornell University Press
- Bilodid,Ivan, "Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy(SUM)" (1978), Naukova dumka
- Bracki,Artur, "Surzhyk – opys i vyznachennya ramok yavyshcha", Studii z ukrainistyky, 7, pp.132~145 (2007)
- Busel, V.T, "Velyky tlumachny slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainaskoi movy (VTSUM)" (2005), Perun
- Del Gaudio, Salvatore, "Surzhyk: aktualni pytannya ta analiz konkretnoho prykladu" (2010), Kyyevo‐Mohylyanska academia
- Kozyarsky, Bohdan, "Nyshchennya ukrainskoi movy ponevoluvachamy Ukrainy", Vseukrainska pravozahysna hazeta, 통권 : 3 (1995)
- Masenko,Larysa, "Surzhyk u systemi rozmovnyh form pobutuvannya ukrainskoi movy", Dyvoslovo, 12, pp.26~31 (2007)
- Masenko,Larysa, "Mizh movou ta yazykom" (2011), Kyyevo‐Mohylyanska academia
- Myechkovskaya, Nina, "Trasyanka u kantynuume belaruska‐ruskih idyyalektau: hto i kali razmaulyaye na trasyantsy", Vesnik BDU, 1, pp.91~97 (2007)
- Polonska‐Vasylenko, Natalya, "Istoriya Ukrainy" (2002), Lybid
- Myechkovskaya, Nina, "Movy i kultura Belarusi: narysy" (2002), Prava i ekanomika
- Myechkovskaya, Nina, "Istoriya Ukrainy" (2002), Lybid
- Procter,Paul et als, "Cambridge International Dictionary of English" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Rusanivsky Vitaly, "Ukrainska mova.Entsyklopediya(UME)" (2004), Bazhana
- Subtelny,Orest, "Ukraine:A History" (2009), Toronto University Press
- Taniuk,Les’, "Komu zakony ne pysani?(mova,kultura,vira)" (2003), Narodny Rukh Ukrainy
- Trub,Volodymyr, "Yavishche ”surzhyku” yak forma prostorichchya v sytuatsiyi dvomovnosti", Movoznavstvo, 1, pp.46~48 (2000)
- Zastavny,Fedir, "Naselennya Ukrayiny: do 125‐richchya Prosvity" (1993), Krai, Prosvita