Literariness, Form, and the Author
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the past hundred years, the importance of the author to literary theories ofinterpretation has been disputed, first by the Russian Formalists, then via thetheoretical approach of American New Criticism, and finally, by Structuralismand Post-structuralism. In this paper, special attention is given to MichaelRiffaterre’s Structural Stylistics and Reception theory. The role of the author isperceived in a new light, through the introduction of an implicit reference thatunites the text, the reception of the text by readers, and the artistic attitudes of theauthor. We also discuss implicit reference, which is the sum of formal principlesorganizing literary work, as perceived by educated and informed readers (i.e.,l’archilecteur [super reader]) and confirmed by the principles governing theauthor’s poetics. In implicit reference, all those aspects of writers’personal livesand behaviour which define their artistic practice and methods and the principlesgoverning their art return once more to the theory of interpretation.
Abstract
In the past hundred years, the importance of the author to literary theories ofinterpretation has been disputed, first by the Russian Formalists, then via thetheoretical approach of American New Criticism, and finally, by Structuralismand Post-structuralism. In this paper, special attention is given to MichaelRiffaterre’s Structural Stylistics and Reception theory. The role of the author isperceived in a new light, through the introduction of an implicit reference thatunites the text, the reception of the text by readers, and the artistic attitudes of theauthor. We also discuss implicit reference, which is the sum of formal principlesorganizing literary work, as perceived by educated and informed readers (i.e.,l’archilecteur [super reader]) and confirmed by the principles governing theauthor’s poetics. In implicit reference, all those aspects of writers’personal livesand behaviour which define their artistic practice and methods and the principlesgoverning their art return once more to the theory of interpretation.
참고문헌 (14)
- Barthes, Roland, "Critique et vérité" (1966), Éditions du Seuil
- Barthes, Roland, "Image, Music, Text" (1977), Hill and Wang
- Barthes, Roland, "Image, Music, Text" (1977), Hill and Wang
- Derrida, Jacques, "De la grammatologie" (1967), Les Édition de Minuit
- Erlich, Victor, "Russian Formalism. The Hague" (1969), Mouton
- Foucault, Michel, "Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Vol. Two" (1998), The New Press
- Jakobson, Roman, "Novejšaja russkaja poèzija" (1921), Tipografija Politika
- Jakobson, Roman, "Style in Language" (1960), The M. I. T. Press
- Olsen, Stein Haugom, "A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy)" (2010), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Riffaterre, Michael, "Criteria for Style Analysis" (1959), Word
- Riffaterre, Michael, "Essais de Stylistique Structurale" (1971), Flammarion
- Shütze, Martin, "Academic illusions in the field of Letters and the Arts" (1962), Archon Books
- Spitzer, Leo, "Linguistic and Literary History. Princeton" (1970), Princeton University Press
- Wimsatt, William, "The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry" (1954), University of Kentucky Press