Word Formation Models in Xlebnikov’s Poetry
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among major figures in Russian literary history, the Silver Age poet Velemir Xlebnikov is the one who made the most extensive use of word formation devices to enrich his poetic voice. Some of his poetry is literally untranslatable, because its meaning is derived from the newly coined words that the poet includes. They often comprise a remarkably high percentage of the entire poem, and the translator has no equivalent resources to render these artistic formations. This feature of Xlebnikov’s work has made him a popular target for linguists interested in artistic aspects of the Russian language. In this paper I’d like to present a small typology of Xlebnikov’s artistic formations, categorizing them in three groups: 1) real potential words; 2) remotely possible words; 3) virtually impossible words that still function artistically. I analyze examples in each category in terms of their status within the Russian system of derivational morphology and their artistic function within the poem. It should be understood that I approach these literary texts as a linguist, not a literary critic. I am interested in them primarily for the unique examples they provide, not for global generalizations about Xlebnikov’s style, philosophy, or poetic voice.
Abstract
Among major figures in Russian literary history, the Silver Age poet Velemir Xlebnikov is the one who made the most extensive use of word formation devices to enrich his poetic voice. Some of his poetry is literally untranslatable, because its meaning is derived from the newly coined words that the poet includes. They often comprise a remarkably high percentage of the entire poem, and the translator has no equivalent resources to render these artistic formations. This feature of Xlebnikov’s work has made him a popular target for linguists interested in artistic aspects of the Russian language. In this paper I’d like to present a small typology of Xlebnikov’s artistic formations, categorizing them in three groups: 1) real potential words; 2) remotely possible words; 3) virtually impossible words that still function artistically. I analyze examples in each category in terms of their status within the Russian system of derivational morphology and their artistic function within the poem. It should be understood that I approach these literary texts as a linguist, not a literary critic. I am interested in them primarily for the unique examples they provide, not for global generalizations about Xlebnikov’s style, philosophy, or poetic voice.
참고문헌 (7)
- 추석훈, "A Stylistic Zero Sign: The Paradigmatics of Chehov`s Prose Style", 노어노문학, 16(2), pp.79~102 (2004), 한국노어노문학회
- Dworkin, Craig, "To Destroy Language", Textual Practice, 18(2), pp.185~197 (2004)
- Jakobson, Roman., "Novejšaja russkaja poezija: Nabrosok pervyj" (1921), Prague
- Kručenyx, Aleksej., "Novye puti slova" (1913), Troja
- Laskewicz, Zachar., "Zaum: Words without Meaning or Meaning without Words? Towards a Musical Understanding of Language", Paper presented at the International Summer Congresses for Structural and Semiotic Studies (1995)
- Magarotto, Luigi, "Zaumnyj futurizm i dadaizm v russkoj kul’ture" (1991), Peter Lang
- Pavlovszky, Maria., "Leksiko-stilističeskij analiz poezii Sergeja Esenina", 박사, pp.1990
