본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기복도 분석을 통한 표준 한국어 의문문과 표준 중국어 의문문의 억양 비교

The Comparative Study of Interrogative Sentence Intonation Between Standard Korean and Beijing Mandarin By The Undulating Scale

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In this paper, the pitch difference between Korean and Chinese interrogative sentence intonations was analyzed using the formal theory and the undulating scale theory by Feng Shi, Ping Wang, and Lei Liang (2008). Interrogative sentences with an interrogative pronoun were not considered in this paper. The Korean result was obtained from an experiment on four native speakers randomly chosen, and the Chinese result was referred from the formal paper of Feng Shi and Ping Wang. The Korean result showed that AP3, AP2, and AP1 were ranked as larger pitch ranges in sequence and the Chinese result showed that AP3, AP1, and AP2 were ranked as larger pitch ranges in sequence. According to this result, the standard Korean undulating tone was mainly influenced by the presence of the laryngeal features of first-syllable consonants in each AP. Consequently, most native Koreans who spoke Chinese as a foreign language demonstrate a Korean pitch pattern with Chinese interrogative speaking.

Abstract

In this paper, the pitch difference between Korean and Chinese interrogative sentence intonations was analyzed using the formal theory and the undulating scale theory by Feng Shi, Ping Wang, and Lei Liang (2008). Interrogative sentences with an interrogative pronoun were not considered in this paper. The Korean result was obtained from an experiment on four native speakers randomly chosen, and the Chinese result was referred from the formal paper of Feng Shi and Ping Wang. The Korean result showed that AP3, AP2, and AP1 were ranked as larger pitch ranges in sequence and the Chinese result showed that AP3, AP1, and AP2 were ranked as larger pitch ranges in sequence. According to this result, the standard Korean undulating tone was mainly influenced by the presence of the laryngeal features of first-syllable consonants in each AP. Consequently, most native Koreans who spoke Chinese as a foreign language demonstrate a Korean pitch pattern with Chinese interrogative speaking.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 성철재, "표준한국어 악센트의 음향음성학적 연구", 언어연구, 6, pp.39~64 (1992)
  2. 성철재, "표준한국어 악센트의 실험음성학적 연구", 말소리와 음성과학, 21-24, pp.43~89 (1992)
  3. 신지영, "한국어의 운율 단위와 경음화 현상", 한국어학, 10, pp.27~45 (1999)
  4. 신지영, "말소리의 이해" (2004), 한국문화사
  5. 유재원, "현대국어의 악센트 규칙에 대한 연구", 성곡논총, 19 (1988)
  6. 이호영, "현대 한국어의 악센트에 관한 연구", 석사, 언어학, pp.1987
  7. 이호영, "한국어의 억양체계", 언어학, (13), pp.129~151 (1991), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  8. 이호영, "국어 핵억양의 음향음성학적 연구", 말소리와 음성과학, 38, pp.25~39 (1999)
  9. 정명숙, "한국어 억양의 기본 유형과 교육 방안", 한국어교육, 13(1), pp.10~242 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
  10. 정명숙, "한국어 발음 교육을 위한음성 DB 구축 방안", 말소리, (47), pp.51~72 (2003), 대한음성학회
  11. 金憙成, "韓國语陈述句语调的起伏度硏究", 南开語言學刊, 19, pp.31~41 (2012)
  12. 石锋, "汉语普通话陈述句语调的起伏度", 南开语音年报, 2 (2008)
  13. 石锋, "汉语北京话疑问句语调的起伏度", 南开语音年报, 3(2) (2009)
  14. 李愛軍, "語調硏究中心理和聲學等價單位", 聲學技術, 3 (2005)
  15. Jun, S. A., "The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody", pp.33~64 (1996), Garland Publishing, Inc
  16. "K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) Labelling Conventions" (2000)[URL]
  17. Jun, S. A., "Prosodic Typology" (2005), Oxford University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)