일제강점기 조선의 「신여성」에 관한 담론 형성
The Formation of the Discourse on the “New Woman” in Chosun during the Japanese Occupatione
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The discourse on the “New Woman” in Chosun, developed from the 1920s onwards, was introduced in public through a series of women’s magazines published around this period, in particular, the Sin Yosong (新女性: New Woman). The term “New Woman” generally indicated a woman who had received a modern education provided by officially accredited educational institutions for women, and then its meaning and usage evolved, after the Japanese annexation and ensuing occupation of Korea, to indicate a woman who was in opposition to the traditional “Old Woman.” These “New Women” were willing to challenge the feudalistic, male- dominated patriarchal system and to actively participate in the women’s liberation movement, by promoting women’s rights and gender equality. This new definition also resulted in a change in the discourse on the concept of what it was to be a woman to emerge naturally in this period, that is, the image of the woman who fought to uphold freedom, equality, and free love, as opposed to that of the traditional hyonmoyangcho (good wife), whom society expected to look after her in-laws and remain subservient to her husband. However, the mainstream view and subsequent appraisal of “New Women” was, for the most part, negative or critical: they were ignored by the very modernity instrumental in forming their own consciousness, whose once-glorious times they had long strived to relish to the fullest. Hence, it can be said that for “New Women,” their great desire for, and concerns about, modernity have been left unresolved.
Abstract
The discourse on the “New Woman” in Chosun, developed from the 1920s onwards, was introduced in public through a series of women’s magazines published around this period, in particular, the Sin Yosong (新女性: New Woman). The term “New Woman” generally indicated a woman who had received a modern education provided by officially accredited educational institutions for women, and then its meaning and usage evolved, after the Japanese annexation and ensuing occupation of Korea, to indicate a woman who was in opposition to the traditional “Old Woman.” These “New Women” were willing to challenge the feudalistic, male- dominated patriarchal system and to actively participate in the women’s liberation movement, by promoting women’s rights and gender equality. This new definition also resulted in a change in the discourse on the concept of what it was to be a woman to emerge naturally in this period, that is, the image of the woman who fought to uphold freedom, equality, and free love, as opposed to that of the traditional hyonmoyangcho (good wife), whom society expected to look after her in-laws and remain subservient to her husband. However, the mainstream view and subsequent appraisal of “New Women” was, for the most part, negative or critical: they were ignored by the very modernity instrumental in forming their own consciousness, whose once-glorious times they had long strived to relish to the fullest. Hence, it can be said that for “New Women,” their great desire for, and concerns about, modernity have been left unresolved.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김경일, "여성의 근대, 근대의 여성" (2004), 푸른역사
- 김윤선, "근대 여성매체 『신여성』에 나타난 여성의 소비문화", 동양학, (45), pp.41~62 (2009), 동양학연구원
- 김응화, "근대 상품광고로 본 新소비문화와 신여성", 동국사학, (52), pp.157~197 (2012), 동국역사문화연구소
- 연구공간<수유+너머>근대매체연구팀, "매체로 본 근대 여성 풍속사 신여성" (2005), 한계레신문사
- 주창윤, "1920∼1930년대 ‘모던 세대’의 형성과정", 한국언론학보, 52(5), pp.186~206 (2008), 한국언론학회
- "婦人, 통권 제10호, 1923.4", ~ (1923)
- "新女性, 통권 제1호, 1923.9", ~ (1923)
- "新女性, 통권 제3호, 1924.2", ~ (1924)
- "新女性, 통권 제17호, 1925.6", ~ (1925)
- "新女性, 통권 제16호 1925.5", ~ (1925)
- "新女性, 통권 제19호, 1925.9", ~ (1925)
- "新女性, 통권 제21호, 1925.11", ~ (1925)
- "新女性, 통권 제24호, 1926.3", ~ (1926)
- "新女性, 통권 제29호, 1926.8", ~ (1926)
- "新女性, 통권 제30호, 1926.9", ~ (1926)
