唐・宋代 災異論의 변화 ― 『舊唐書』 「五行志」 및 『新唐書』 「五行志」에 대한 분석을 중심으로 ―
The Transition in the Theory of Calamity as a Warning Signal during the Tang and Song period
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article mainly examines the theory of calamity as a warning signal during the Tang and Song period of Chinese history. Through carrying out the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志), in particular, this research shows us that there were significant changes in their perspectives on the conventional correlative cosmology. The Chinese people of the Tang Dynasty, who built up the great cosmopolitan empire, had come to interpret the phenomena of nature like the natural disasters from a new angle. Since the Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒) of the Han Dynasty compiled all the different ideas about the ancient correlative cosmologies like the theory of Yin and Yang and theory of the Five Elements(五行) into a systematic and powerful theory, there had been no noticeable change in the Chinese perspective on nature until the Tang Chinese came to have different view on it. The opinions of the Tang court officials like Yu Zhining(于志寧) and Cen Wenben(岑文本) on the natural disasters which had occurred during the early period of Tang Dynasty, in particular, exemplified their new and changed view on nature. They argued that natural disasters did not necessarily result from the sovereign’s failures in his rule, which were distinctly different from the Dong Zhongshu’s ideas. On the other hand, other court officials of roughly the same period like Yu Wenjun(俞文俊) and Song Wuguang(宋務光) suggested significantly different comments on the natural disasters. From their perspectives, the natural calamities like the flooding happened because the sovereignty of the Empress Dowager Wu(武則天) and the Empress Dowager Wei(韋后) lacked the legitimacy. Even though their ideas had similar aspects with the Dong Zhongshu’s, their opinion also had considerable differences from the schematic model of correlative cosmology. They just tried to oppose the rule of the female sovereigns. To sum up, the early Tang elites were relatively free from the ancient theory of calamity as a warning signal(災異論) and suggested diverse approaches to the interpretation of the natural disorders. Consequently, the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and the Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) shows us that the Tang and Song Chinese began to depart from the conventional understanding of the universe and take quite different views of it.
Abstract
This article mainly examines the theory of calamity as a warning signal during the Tang and Song period of Chinese history. Through carrying out the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志), in particular, this research shows us that there were significant changes in their perspectives on the conventional correlative cosmology. The Chinese people of the Tang Dynasty, who built up the great cosmopolitan empire, had come to interpret the phenomena of nature like the natural disasters from a new angle. Since the Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒) of the Han Dynasty compiled all the different ideas about the ancient correlative cosmologies like the theory of Yin and Yang and theory of the Five Elements(五行) into a systematic and powerful theory, there had been no noticeable change in the Chinese perspective on nature until the Tang Chinese came to have different view on it. The opinions of the Tang court officials like Yu Zhining(于志寧) and Cen Wenben(岑文本) on the natural disasters which had occurred during the early period of Tang Dynasty, in particular, exemplified their new and changed view on nature. They argued that natural disasters did not necessarily result from the sovereign’s failures in his rule, which were distinctly different from the Dong Zhongshu’s ideas. On the other hand, other court officials of roughly the same period like Yu Wenjun(俞文俊) and Song Wuguang(宋務光) suggested significantly different comments on the natural disasters. From their perspectives, the natural calamities like the flooding happened because the sovereignty of the Empress Dowager Wu(武則天) and the Empress Dowager Wei(韋后) lacked the legitimacy. Even though their ideas had similar aspects with the Dong Zhongshu’s, their opinion also had considerable differences from the schematic model of correlative cosmology. They just tried to oppose the rule of the female sovereigns. To sum up, the early Tang elites were relatively free from the ancient theory of calamity as a warning signal(災異論) and suggested diverse approaches to the interpretation of the natural disorders. Consequently, the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and the Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) shows us that the Tang and Song Chinese began to depart from the conventional understanding of the universe and take quite different views of it.
참고문헌 (18)
- 劉昫, "舊唐書" (1995), 中華書局
- 歐陽脩, "新唐書" (1997), 中華書局
- 脫脫, "宋史" (1995), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑑" (1995), 中華書局
- 柳宗元, "柳河東全集" (1996), 燕山出版社
- 柳宗元, "柳宗元集" (1979), 中華書局
- 歐陽脩, "歐陽文忠公集" (1967), 臺灣商務印書館
- 歐陽脩, "歐陽脩全集" (2001), 中華書局
- 朱熹, "朱子全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 董誥, "全唐文" (2001), 中華書局
- 권민균, "天人關係에 대한 漢人의 인식 ― 『漢書』「五行志」역주 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (54), pp.149~182 (2019), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 김정희, "유종원 사상의 특징 ; 순자와 비교하여", 동서철학연구, (85), pp.167~184 (2017), 한국동서철학회[DOI]
- 김한신, "北宋 朝廷의 民間信仰 統制 ― 民間信仰의 改革과 儒家的 禮的 秩序의 確立 ―", 동양사학연구, (130), pp.127~156 (2015), 동양사학회
- 李润强, "丝路文化与五凉文学研究" (2012), 人民出版社
- 정우진, "상관적 사유의 비판적 고찰", 범한철학, 58(3), pp.1~25 (2010), 범한철학회
- 조원일, "劉禹錫的天人關係論管窺", 한국철학논집, (33), pp.239~253 (2012), 한국철학사연구회[DOI]
- 존 헨더슨, "중국의 우주론과 청대의 과학혁명" (2004), 소명출판
- Bol, Peter K, "This Culture of Ours: intellectual traditions in T’ang and Sung China" (1992), Stanford University Press
