카자흐스탄 정치엘리트의 정체성 연구 - 민족국가 건설을 중심으로 -
The Research on the Kazakh Political Elites' Identity: According to the Construction of Nation-Building
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kazakhstan has failed the construction of the 'Nation-State' relatively as compared with other Central Asian states. This evaluation is from various reasons: the Kazakh was minority at the time of independence according to the spread of population and there are about 120 nations, including Russians at this country. This research tries to analyze the failure of the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan from the problems of the Kazakh Political Elites' identity apart from the upper reasons. As we know, the Kazakh Political Elites are from the high-ranking government official in the former Soviet Union and have rights to decide on a direction to the construction of the 'Nation-State'. They wanted to construct the 'Nation-State' during the early 1990s but changed the national policy from Nationalism to the unification of the Nation in 1995. Above all, the population of the Kazakh is more than 60% of the overall Kazakhstan population from 1997. In my opinions, these external problems as like the component ratio of the population have a difficulty to analyze these situations objectively. So, we may consider the Kazakh Political Elites' identity as the critical variable to analyze the failure of the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan. To establish the direct connection between the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan and the Kazakh Political Elites' identity this paper has research contents as it follows: First, the formation process of the Kazakh Political Elites from the Russian Empire to the collapse of the Soviet Union is analyzed. Second, the power structure among the main 3 clan groups as like 'the Great jüz, the Middle jüz, the Little jüz' in Kazakhstan after the Independence is analyzed. Third, based on the upper analyses, the Kazakh Political Elites' identity is analyzed and the national policies are reinterpreted.
Abstract
Kazakhstan has failed the construction of the 'Nation-State' relatively as compared with other Central Asian states. This evaluation is from various reasons: the Kazakh was minority at the time of independence according to the spread of population and there are about 120 nations, including Russians at this country. This research tries to analyze the failure of the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan from the problems of the Kazakh Political Elites' identity apart from the upper reasons. As we know, the Kazakh Political Elites are from the high-ranking government official in the former Soviet Union and have rights to decide on a direction to the construction of the 'Nation-State'. They wanted to construct the 'Nation-State' during the early 1990s but changed the national policy from Nationalism to the unification of the Nation in 1995. Above all, the population of the Kazakh is more than 60% of the overall Kazakhstan population from 1997. In my opinions, these external problems as like the component ratio of the population have a difficulty to analyze these situations objectively. So, we may consider the Kazakh Political Elites' identity as the critical variable to analyze the failure of the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan. To establish the direct connection between the construction of the 'Nation-State' in Kazakhstan and the Kazakh Political Elites' identity this paper has research contents as it follows: First, the formation process of the Kazakh Political Elites from the Russian Empire to the collapse of the Soviet Union is analyzed. Second, the power structure among the main 3 clan groups as like 'the Great jüz, the Middle jüz, the Little jüz' in Kazakhstan after the Independence is analyzed. Third, based on the upper analyses, the Kazakh Political Elites' identity is analyzed and the national policies are reinterpreted.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김상철, "중앙아시아의 소수민족관계 연구:카자흐스탄 사례를 중심으로 -카자흐스탄의 다민족 문화공동체 형성에 대한 역사적 접근-", 한국중동학회논총, 28(1), pp.407~435 (2007), 한국중동학회
- 김상철, "중앙아시아 주요 토착민족 공동체의 상이성 연구: 우즈베크 및 카자흐의 국가형성 과정과 대제정러시아 관계를 중심으로", 중소연구, 32(2), pp.179~222 (2008), 아태지역연구센터
- 김상철, "중앙아시아의 소수민족관계 연구: 소련시기 및 독립 카자흐스탄의 인구학적인 변화와 민족관계를 중심으로", 국제지역연구, 12(1), pp.51~82 (2008), 국제지역연구센터
- 김상철, "현대 카자흐스탄 엘리트 제도와 형성과정", 중소연구, 33(4), pp.187~220 (2010), 아태지역연구센터
- 손영훈, "카자흐스탄의 ‘러시아인 문제’와 카자흐화 정책", 중동연구, 25(2), pp.117~150 (2007), 중동연구소
- 손영훈, "카자흐스탄 민족통합 과정에서 카자흐어의 역할 연구", 중동연구, 27(3), pp.155~179 (2009), 중동연구소
- Akiner, S., "The Formation of Kazakh Identity; From Tribe to Nation-State" (1995), Royal Institute of International Affairs
- Bhavna, D., "Demographic and Language Politics in the 1999 Kazakhstan Census", The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (2002)
- Bhavna, D., "National revival in Kazakhstan: language shift and identity change", Post-Soviet Affairs, 12(1), pp.51~72 (1996)
- Blank, S., "Ethnic and party politics in Soviet Kazakhstan 1920-1924", Central Asian Survey, 10(3), pp.1~19 (1991)
- Buyers, M. L., "Central Asia in Focus: Political and Economic Issues" (2003), Nova Science
- Cummings, N. S., "Kazakhstan: Power and the Elite" (2005), I.B. Tauris
- Cummings, N. S., "Legitimation and Identification in Kazakhstan", Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 12(2), pp.177~204 (2006)
- Fierman, W., "Language and Identity in Kazakhstan", Communist and Post-Communist, 31(2), pp.171~186 (1998)
- Kendirbaeva, G., "Migrations in Kazakhstan:Past and Present", Nationalities Papers, 25(4), pp.741~751 (1997)
- Melvin, J. N., "Patterns of Centre-Regional Relations in Central Asia: The Cases of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan", Regional & Federal Studies, 11(3), pp.165~193 (2001)
- Murphy, J., "Illusory Transition? Elite Reconstitution in Kazakhstan, 1989-2002", Europe-Asia Studies, 58(4), pp.523~554 (2006)
- Olcott B. M., "The Kazakhs(2nd ed)" (1995), Hoover Institution Press
- Oraltay, H., "The alash movement in Turkestan", Central Asian Survey, 4(2), pp.41~58 (1985)
- Sarsembayev, A., "Imagined Communities:Kazak Nationalism and Kazakification in the 1990s", Central Asian Survey, 18(3), pp.319~346 (1999)
- Schatz, E., "The Politics of Multiple Identities:Lineage and Ethnicity in Kazakhstan", Europe-Asia Studies, 52(3), pp.489~506 (2000)
- Schatz, E., "Reconceptualizing clans:Kinship networks and statehood in Kazakhstan", Nationalities Papers, 33(2), pp.231~254 (2005)
- Shorish, M. M., "Islam and nationalism in west Turkestan(Central Asia)on the eve of October revolution", Nationalities Papers, 12(2), pp.247~263 (1984)