일상에서의 고정성에 대한 기호학적 고찰
Semiotic consideration of fixity in everyday life
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the fixed entities that exist in society and the subject. First, we explained the process by which fixity is created through the structure of a sign, which is a combination of a signifier and a signified. This fixity is already revealed, such as social customs, norms, and standards, and has a broader concept than promises and ideas that subjects already adhere to. We understood this fixity in connection with Barth's concept of myth. The structure of myth revealed by Barth allows us to identify the fundamental cause of fixity and the mechanism by which it spreads. As the composition and creation mechanism of myth were revealed, it was proven that there were subjects who had adjusted the combination of signifier and signified, and it was also revealed that all subjects in this society had participated in the acceptance and production of myth. We also examined the process of play with fixity performed by subjects through discussions of Danto, Flusser, and surrealism.
Abstract
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the fixed entities that exist in society and the subject. First, we explained the process by which fixity is created through the structure of a sign, which is a combination of a signifier and a signified. This fixity is already revealed, such as social customs, norms, and standards, and has a broader concept than promises and ideas that subjects already adhere to. We understood this fixity in connection with Barth's concept of myth. The structure of myth revealed by Barth allows us to identify the fundamental cause of fixity and the mechanism by which it spreads. As the composition and creation mechanism of myth were revealed, it was proven that there were subjects who had adjusted the combination of signifier and signified, and it was also revealed that all subjects in this society had participated in the acceptance and production of myth. We also examined the process of play with fixity performed by subjects through discussions of Danto, Flusser, and surrealism.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김인식, "바르트 기호학의 해체: 롤랑 바르트의 기호학적 모험2", 기호학연구, 2, pp.121~143 (1996)
- 마단 사럽, "후기 구조주의와 포스트모더니즘" (2005), 서울하우스
- 배영달, "속도의 예술 초미학" (2019), 도서출판 앨피
- 빌렘 플루서, "그림의 혁명" (2004), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 아서 단토, "예술의 종말 이후" (2004), 미술문화
- 앙드레 브르통, "초현실주의 선언" (2012), 미메시스
- 유리 로트만, "기호계: 문화연구와 문화기호학" (2008), 문학과 지성사
- 정광흠, "초현실주의 이론과 현대 미술", 불어불문학연구, (58), pp.521~552 (2004), 한국불어불문학회
- 최용호, "소쉬르는 이렇게 말했다: 동시대성 사유 이미지" (2017), 세창출판사
- 피나 랄리, "상상적 차원과 해석학적 독해 in 일상생활의 사회학" (1994), 한울아카데미
- Arrivé Michel, "Linguistique et psychanalyse: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan, et les autres" (1987), Klincksieck
- Barthes Roland, "Leçon" (1978), Editions du Seuil
- Barthes Roland, "SZ" (1970), Editions du Seuil
- Culler Jonathan, "Barthes: A Very Short Introduction" (1983), Oxford University Press
- Danto Arthur, "The Transfiguration of Commonplace" (1983), Havard University Press
- Elden Stuart, "Understanding Henri Lefebvre" (2004), Continum
- Lefebvre Henri, "La vie quotidienne dans le monde moderne" (1968), Gallimard
- Roland Barthes, "Mythologies" (1957), Editions du Seuil
- Saussure Ferdinand de, "Cours de linguistique générale", Payo. Soshwir, ~ (1916)
- Ferdinang deu, "Cour deu lingwuistiq general", Payo, ~ (1916)