본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

민족/국경을 넘은 재난 속 상호연대의 불/가능성 — 『맨발의 겐(はだしのゲン)』 다시 읽기 —

The im/possibility of cross-border and ethnic solidarity in disaster -reread the comic book “Hadashi no Gen”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to reread "Hadashi no Gen," Japan's representative atomic bomb manga, from the perspective of "Post 3.11" and "Post-Earthquake Literature" after March 11, 2011. The so-called ‘post-earthquake literature’ after the Great East Japan Earthquake is a favorable change of direction in that Japanese society, which declares the end of post-war Japan as "we before disaster," tries to pursue a future-oriented vision by reconstructing and rereading memories of past disasters. However, When Japan summons and evokes the history of disaster, if the history of madness and violence that Japanese have shown in disaster is forgotten again, what effect will the view of ‘post-earthquake literature’ have? The limitation of "Hadashi no Gen," which has been evaluated to be different from other atomic bomb literature by engraving the forgotten existence of Korean atomic bomb victims in postwar Japanese society, lies in its reconciliation. This is not only "Hadashi no Gen," but also the limitation of atomic bomb literature itself. On the other hand, if Park's presence in "Hadashi no Gen" fails to read discrimination against Koreans, it is the limitation of readers. This may also be the limit of post-war Japan and post-earthquake literature, which recalled "we in disaster" but forgot about the massacres of Koreans.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reread "Hadashi no Gen," Japan's representative atomic bomb manga, from the perspective of "Post 3.11" and "Post-Earthquake Literature" after March 11, 2011. The so-called ‘post-earthquake literature’ after the Great East Japan Earthquake is a favorable change of direction in that Japanese society, which declares the end of post-war Japan as "we before disaster," tries to pursue a future-oriented vision by reconstructing and rereading memories of past disasters. However, When Japan summons and evokes the history of disaster, if the history of madness and violence that Japanese have shown in disaster is forgotten again, what effect will the view of ‘post-earthquake literature’ have? The limitation of "Hadashi no Gen," which has been evaluated to be different from other atomic bomb literature by engraving the forgotten existence of Korean atomic bomb victims in postwar Japanese society, lies in its reconciliation. This is not only "Hadashi no Gen," but also the limitation of atomic bomb literature itself. On the other hand, if Park's presence in "Hadashi no Gen" fails to read discrimination against Koreans, it is the limitation of readers. This may also be the limit of post-war Japan and post-earthquake literature, which recalled "we in disaster" but forgot about the massacres of Koreans.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 레베카 솔닛, "이 폐허를 응시하라" (2012), 도서출판 펜타그램
  2. 나카자와 케이지, "맨발의 겐. 1-10권" (2010), 아름드리미디어
  3. 나카자와 케이지, "나의 유서 맨발의 겐" (2014), 아름드리미디어
  4. アンヌ・バヤール, "世界のなかの〈ポスト3.11〉ーヨーロッパと日本の対話" (2019), 新曜社
  5. 青来有一, "小指が燃える" (2017), 文芸春秋社
  6. 石牟礼道子, "菊とナガサキ. 被爆朝鮮人の遺骨は黙したまま", 朝日ジャーナル, 10(33) (1968), 朝日新聞社
  7. 海老原豊, "東日本大震災後文学論" (2017), 南雲堂
  8. 柄谷行人, "創作合評-74:増田みずこ「沈む部屋」津島佑子「浦」林京子「無事」中里恒子「家の中」. 群像. 37-2", 講談社, ~ (1982)
  9. 加納美紀代, "ヒロシマとフクシマのあいだージェンダ-の視点から" (2013), インパクト出版会
  10. 川口隆行, "原爆文学という問題領域" (2011), 創言社
  11. 木村朗子, "震災後文学論ーあたらしい日本文学のために" (2013), 青土社
  12. 木村朗子, "その後の震災後文学論" (2018), 青土社
  13. 酒井直樹, "「無責任の体系」三度. 現代思想" (2011), 現代思想社
  14. 高橋哲哉, "犠牲のシステムー福島・沖縄" (2012), 集英社新書
  15. 鵜飼哲, "「ショア-」の衝撃" (2000), 未来社
  16. 中上健次, "創作合評. 群像" (1982), 講談社
  17. 中上健次, "われらの文学的立場-世代論を越えて", 文学界, 32(10) (1978), 文芸春秋
  18. 長岡弘芳, "原爆文学史" (1973), 風媒社
  19. 福間良明, "「反戦」のメディア史ー戦後日本における世論と輿論の拮抗" (2006), 世界思想社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)