푸틴의 직시어 활용에 관한 연구 -언술작용의 통역맵핑을 위한 내용분석
On some aspects of the deixis 'I' & 'We' in Putin's two Inaugural Addresses: An Interpreting Mapping on Enunciation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One’s utilization of deixis shows his psychological attitude to the language which he conducts in his politicallife, as well as in his everyday life. This study studies Putin’s last two inaugural addresses first, through a psycholinguistic analysis of the theoretical background, and second, through a comparative analysis of several themes drawn from the two addresses, using inductive reasoning. Several characteristics of Putin’s choice of deixis were discovered. Putin used ‘I’to represent individual responsibility for the Russian state or presidential affairs and obstacles faced by the state whereas he chose ‘we’to represent collective responsibility for the general national affairs and success of the state at every level; economic growth, opened diplomatic situation, development of social security, etc. Putin also uses ‘I’ and ‘we’ to correspond to a collective national mind, reflecting mental harmony between the Russian people and himself. While these results could hardly be extrapolated as a psycho-analysis of Putin’s ideology or personality, it shows that he wants to identify openly his own presidential devices to the destiny of the Russian people. On the other hand, observing his discursive intentionality could lead to a mental mapping for interpreting these kinds of text.
Abstract
One’s utilization of deixis shows his psychological attitude to the language which he conducts in his politicallife, as well as in his everyday life. This study studies Putin’s last two inaugural addresses first, through a psycholinguistic analysis of the theoretical background, and second, through a comparative analysis of several themes drawn from the two addresses, using inductive reasoning. Several characteristics of Putin’s choice of deixis were discovered. Putin used ‘I’to represent individual responsibility for the Russian state or presidential affairs and obstacles faced by the state whereas he chose ‘we’to represent collective responsibility for the general national affairs and success of the state at every level; economic growth, opened diplomatic situation, development of social security, etc. Putin also uses ‘I’ and ‘we’ to correspond to a collective national mind, reflecting mental harmony between the Russian people and himself. While these results could hardly be extrapolated as a psycho-analysis of Putin’s ideology or personality, it shows that he wants to identify openly his own presidential devices to the destiny of the Russian people. On the other hand, observing his discursive intentionality could lead to a mental mapping for interpreting these kinds of text.
참고문헌 (20)
- 방교영, "푸틴 정치담화의 행위소 구조분석", 슬라브연구, 22(2) (2006)
- 방교영, "통역현장에서 기호학적 도구 적용에 관한 연구", 한국기호학회, 22 (2007)
- 신항식, "시각영상 커뮤니케이션" (2004), 나남출판사
- Barthes, Roland, "Elements of Semiology" (1967), Hill and Wang
- Benvenist,Emile, "일반언어학의 제문제" (1989), 한불문화출판
- Davis, Howard, "Language, Image, Media" (1983), Basil Blackwell
- Danesi,Marcel, "Messages and Meanings:An Introduction to Semiotics" (1994), Canadian Scholars' Press
- Ducrot Oswald, "Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language" (1979), Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hawkes,Terence, "Structuralism and Semiotics" (1977), Routledge
- Hodge,Robert, "Social Semiotics" (1988), Polity
- Jakobson,Roman, "Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. in Russian Language Project, Dept. of Slavic Linguistics and Literatures" (1957), Harvard University Press
- Kress,Gunther, "Reading Images:The Grammar of Visual Design" (1996), Routledge
- Lyon John, "Semantic(2vols)" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Martinet, Andr?, "Elements of General Linguistics" (1964), University of Chicago Press
- Noeth Wifred, "Handbook of Semiotics" (1990), Illinois University Press
- Rauh, Gisa, "Essays on Deixis" (1983), Gunter
- Saussure Ferdinand de, "Course in General Linguistics" (1966), McGraw-Hill Book Company
- Voloshinov,V.N., "마르크스주의와 언어철학" (1989), 한겨레
- Пан Кеен, "Иследование значения личных местоимений в переводе-Анализ значений местоимений 'мы' в выступлениях В.В.Путина, ВЕСТНИК Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета им" (2007), Н.А.Добролюбова, Серия Проблемы теории, практики и д
- [URL]