중-한 번역에서의 문화 조절과 권력담론 - 중-한 광고텍스트 번역의 자국화와 이국화를 중심으로
Cultural Modulation in Chinese into Korean Translation and Power Discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Current translation theories are based on the concept of mutual reliance of cultures and languages. Namely, the external factors of language play a bigger role in translation than internal factors thereof. For translation research dealing with a diversity of areas, it is necessary to be free from factors immanent in texts and to think that translation is related to society. Then, in macro-perspectives, cultures and social phenomena should be reflected. Having been influenced by post-structuralism, translation researchers start to regard translation not as simple language conversion or information transition in texts, but as the action of power that surfaces in the process of translation between languages of different cultures. Against this backdrop, the best representative scholar is Foucault M., who has had significant effects on the current translation research. Presenting the power discourse theory, he argues that power refers to all the elements in control and rule, forming a type of network in all areas in a human society. Under the restraints of power discourse, from which, translators can not be free, the representative methodologies that can be chosen in the process of translation between languages of different cultures are foreignization and domestication. It is also implied that the process is differently applied by genre, depending upon whether ST and TT are a strong or weak culture.
Abstract
Current translation theories are based on the concept of mutual reliance of cultures and languages. Namely, the external factors of language play a bigger role in translation than internal factors thereof. For translation research dealing with a diversity of areas, it is necessary to be free from factors immanent in texts and to think that translation is related to society. Then, in macro-perspectives, cultures and social phenomena should be reflected. Having been influenced by post-structuralism, translation researchers start to regard translation not as simple language conversion or information transition in texts, but as the action of power that surfaces in the process of translation between languages of different cultures. Against this backdrop, the best representative scholar is Foucault M., who has had significant effects on the current translation research. Presenting the power discourse theory, he argues that power refers to all the elements in control and rule, forming a type of network in all areas in a human society. Under the restraints of power discourse, from which, translators can not be free, the representative methodologies that can be chosen in the process of translation between languages of different cultures are foreignization and domestication. It is also implied that the process is differently applied by genre, depending upon whether ST and TT are a strong or weak culture.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김효중, "해석학적 번역이론과 텍스트 기능", 번역학연구, 5(1), pp.77~95 (2004), 한국번역학회
- 이희재, "번역의 탄생" (2009), 교양인
- 정혜욱, "번역과 문화연구" (2010), 경성대학교출판부
- 郝吉環, "权力话语理论与翻译理论和实践", 语言与翻译, 2 (2004), 苏州大学外国语学院
- 金敬红, "从权力话语理论看异化翻译", 东北大学学报, 5 (2007)
- 林衛東, ""異化”語境下的貫例化用語翻譯, 18", ~ (2010)
- 吕峻, "翻译研究:从文化理论到权力话语" (2000), 四川外语学院学报
- 张瑜, "权力话语制约下的翻译活动", 解放军外国语学院学报, 24(5) (2001)
- Andrew, C, "번역자와 번역학" (2009), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- Roman Alvarrez, "번역, 권력, 전복" (1996), 동인
- Bassnett, S, "Translation, History and Culture" (1990), Printer
- Jakobson, R, "The Translation Studies Reader" (2000), Routledge
- Venuti, L, "The Scandals of Translation: Towards and Ethics of Difference, 번역의 윤리: 차이의 미학을 위하여" (2000), Routledge, 열린책
- Schulte, R, "Theories of Translation: An Anthololy of Essays from Dryden to Derrida" (1992), The University of Chicago Press
